Concept explainers
Scenario Analysis is a technique used to identify the project’s risk and compare the bad and good circumstances with the base case scenario. It considers both the 1) sensitivity of the project’s
To carry out the scenario analysis, it is required to calculate the NPV of worst case, best case and base case, followed by the calculation of its standard deviation and co-efficient of variation. If the co-efficient of variation is higher than the average project of the company, the project should be rejected.
Expected NPV, Standard deviation of NPVs and co-efficient of variation of NPVs are calculated as below:
Here,
Probabilities of the occurrence is “
NPV for each probability is “
Standard deviation of NPVs is “
Co-efficient of Variation of NPVs is “
After conducting a scenario analysis, it is estimated, that the NPV of the project for all the three scenarios is as follows. Determine whether the project should be accepted or rejected if the maximum allowable co-efficient of variation is 0.7.
Scenario | Probability | NPV |
Best Case | 25% | $185,400 |
Base Case | 60% | $128,300 |
Worst Case | 15% | -$77,600 |
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 10 Solutions
CFIN (with Online, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card) (New, Engaging Titles from 4LTR Press)
- Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for surearrow_forwardA financial analyst is attempting to assess the future dividend policy of Environmental Systems by examining its life cycle. She anticipates no payout of earnings in the form of cash dividends during the development stage (I). During the growth stage (II), she anticipates 13 percent of earnings will be distributed as dividends. As the firm progresses to the expansion stage (III), the payout ratio will go up to 37 percent and will eventually reach 59 percent during the maturity stage (IV). a. Assuming earnings per share will be as follows during each of the four stages, indicate the cash dividend per share (if any) during each stage. (Leave no cells blank - be certain to enter "0" wherever required. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places.) Stage I $ 0.40 Stage II 1.80 Stage III 2.70 Stage IV 3.30 b. Assume in Stage IV that an investor owns 325 shares and is in a 15 percent tax bracket. What will be the…arrow_forwardRead the scenario below and answer the questions that follow. A company is under pressure from influential shareholders to change its dividend policy. The company has always followed the residual dividend policy, but the influential shareholders feel that the company needs to change to a stable pay-out ratio policy. The company just reported earnings of R232m for the year ended 31 March 2024. The company is considering the following investment opportunities for the upcoming financial year: Investment opportunity A BUD C E Cost R72m R62m R110m R96m R48m Internal rate of return 14.28% 13.03% 15.67% 16.01% 13.79% The company's cost of capital is 13.5% and its target capital structure is represented by a debt-to-assets ratio of 40%. The company has 28m ordinary shares outstanding.arrow_forward
- A financial analyst is attempting to assess the future dividend policy of Environmental Systems by examining its life cycle. She anticipates no payout of earnings in the form of cash dividends during the development stage (I). During the growth stage (II), she anticipates 14 percent of earnings will be distributed as dividends. As the firm progresses to the expansion stage (III), the payout ratio will go up to 40 percent and will eventually reach 53 percent during the maturity stage (IV). a. Assuming earnings per share will be as follows during each of the four stages, indicate the cash dividend per share (if any) during each stage. Note: Leave no cells blank - be certain to enter "0" wherever required. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places. Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV $ 0.25 1.65 2.40 3.90 Aftertax income Dividends b. Assume in Stage IV that an investor owns 325 shares and is in a 15 percent tax…arrow_forwardA manager believes his firm will earn a return of 12.50 percent next year. His firm has a beta of 1.40, the expected return on the market is 10.50 percent, and the risk-free rate is 3.50 percent. Compute the return the firm should earn given its level of risk. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.) Required return % Determine whether the manager is saying the firm is undervalued or overvalued. O overvalued O undervaluedarrow_forwardYou and your colleague, Adam, are currently participating in a finance internship program at Ironworks Railroad. Your current assignment is to work together to review Ironworks’s current and projected income statements. You will also assess the consequences of management’s capital structure and investment decisions on the firm’s future riskiness. After much discussion, you and Adam decide to calculate Ironworks’s degree of operating leverage (DOL), degree of financial leverage (DFL), and degree of total leverage (DTL) based on this year’s data to gain insights into Ironworks’s risk levels. The most recent income statement for Ironworks Railroad follows. Ironworks is funded solely with debt capital and common equity, and it has 2,000,000 shares of common stock currently outstanding. This Year’s Data Next Year’s Projected Data Sales $60,000,000 $64,500,000 Less: Variable costs 36,000,000 38,700,000 Gross profit $24,000,000 $25,800,000 Less: Fixed operating costs…arrow_forward
- A colleague recommends a shortcut to value the company in the question in attached photo. Rather than compute each scenario separately, the colleague recommends averaging each input, such that growth equals 4 percent and ROIC equals 12 percent. Will this lead to the same enterprise value as you found in the question attached in the photo? Which method is correct? Why?arrow_forwardSuppose a company is choosing between two projects. The first project has an internal rate of return (IRR) of 9%, while the second project has an internal rate of return of 8%. The CEO believes that the first project will create additional shareholder value and should therefore be implemented. Do you agree with the CEO?arrow_forwardA financial manager believes that her firm will earn a 15% return next year. This firm has a beta of 1.8, and the expected return on the market is 8% while the risk-free rate is 2%. First, compute the return this firm should earn given its level of risk. Second, determine whether this firm’s stock is overvalued or undervalued given what the manager thinks this company will earn next year.arrow_forward
- Your business plan for your proposed start-up firm envisions first-year revenues of $120,000, fixed costs of $30,000, and variable costs equal to one-third of revenue.a. What are expected profits based on these expectations?b. What is the degree of operating leverage based on the estimate of fixed costs and expected profits?c. If sales are 10% below expectation, what will be the decrease in profits?d. Show that the percentage decrease in profits equals DOL times the 10% drop in sales.e. Based on the DOL, what is the largest percentage shortfall in sales relative to original expectations that the firm can sustain before profits turn negative?f. What are break-even sales at this point?g. Confirm that your answer to (f) is correct by calculating profits at the break-even level of sales.arrow_forwardThe board of directors of Mystery Entertainment, Inc., wants the CEO to boost return on equity (ROE). During a recent interview, they announced their plan to improve the firm’s financial performance. They will raise the prices on all of the company’s products by 10%. They justify the plan by observing that ROE can be decomposed into the product of profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. By raising prices, it is believed this will increase the profit margin and thus ROE. Is this reasonable? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardConsider the setting of Problem 18. You decided to look for other comparables to reduce estimation error in your cost of capital estimate. You find a second firm, Thurbinar Design, which is also engaged in a similar line of business. Thurbinar has a stock price of $20 per share, with 15 million shares outstanding. It also has $100 million in outstanding debt, with a yield on the debt of 4.5%. Thurbinar’s equity beta is 1.00. (1) Assume Thurbinar’s debt has a beta of zero. Estimate Thurbinar’s unlevered beta. Use the unlevered beta and the CAPM to estimate Thurbinar’s unlevered cost of capital. (2) Estimate Thurbinar’s equity cost of capital using the CAPM. Then assume its debt cost of capital equals its yield, and using these results, estimate Thurbinar’s unlevered cost of capital. (3) Explain the difference between your estimates in part (1) and part (2). (4) You decide to average your results in part (1) and part (2), and then average this result with your estimate from Problem 18.…arrow_forward
- Financial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis...FinanceISBN:9781285190907Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark BradshawPublisher:Cengage Learning