
Concept explainers
Requirement-1(a):
To calculate: Material Price and Quantity variances
Requirement-1(a):

Answer to Problem 14P
Solution: Material Price and Quantity variances are as follows:
Direct Material Price Variance | $ 15,000.00 | Favorable |
Direct Material Quantity Variance | $ 2,500.00 | Unfavorable |
Explanation of Solution
Material Price and Quantity variances are calculated as follows:
Direct Material Price Variance: | ||
Actual Price (A) = (225000/12000) | $ 18.75 | Per Ounce |
Standard Price (B) | $ 20.00 | Per Ounce |
Actual Quantity (C) | 12000 | Ounces |
Direct Material Price Variance = (A-B)*C = | $ 15,000.00 | Favorable |
Direct Material Quantity Variance: | ||
Actual Quantity (A) (12000-2500) | 9500 | Ounces |
Standard Quantity (B) (3750 units *2.5) | 9375 | Ounces |
Standard Price (C) | $ 20.00 | Per Ounce |
Direct Material Quantity Variance = (A-B)*C = | $ 2,500.00 | Unfavorable |
Material Price and Quantity variances are as follows:
Direct Material Price Variance | $ 15,000.00 | Favorable |
Direct Material Quantity Variance | $ 2,500.00 | Unfavorable |
Requirement-1(b):
To state: The decision for purchase of more material from existing supplier
Requirement-1(b):

Answer to Problem 14P
Solution: The Company should sign a long term contract with the existing supplier.
Explanation of Solution
The Company should sign a long term contract with the existing supplier because the rate of material is less than the standard rate and Direct Material Price Variance is favorable.
The Company should sign a long term contract with the existing supplier.
Requirement-2(a):
To calculate: Direct Labor Rate and Efficiency variances
Requirement-2(a):

Answer to Problem 14P
Solution: Direct Labor Rate and Efficiency variances are as follows:
Direct Labor Rate Variance | $ 2,800.00 | Favorable |
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance | $ 7,875.00 | Unfavorable |
Explanation of Solution
Direct Labor Rate and Efficiency variances are calculated as follows:
Direct Labor Rate Variance: | ||
Actual Rate (A) = (225000/12000) | $ 22.00 | Per hour |
Standard Rate (B) | $ 22.50 | Per hour |
Actual hours (C) (35 employees *160 hours) | 5600 | Hours |
Direct Labor Rate Variance = (A-B)*C = | $ 2,800.00 | Favorable |
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance: | ||
Actual hours (A) (35 employees *160 hours) | 5600 | Hours |
Standard Hours (B) (3750 units *1.4 hours) | 5250 | Hours |
Standard Rate (C) | $ 22.50 | Per hour |
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance =(A-B)*C = | $ 7,875.00 | Unfavorable |
Direct Labor Rate and Efficiency variances are as follows:
Direct Labor Rate Variance | $ 2,800.00 | Favorable |
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance | $ 7,875.00 | Unfavorable |
Requirement-2(b):
To state: The decision to continue the labor mix
Requirement-2(b):

Answer to Problem 14P
Solution: The Company should continue the labor mix.
Explanation of Solution
The Company should continue the labor mix because the Direct Labor Rate Variance is favorable which means the actual cost of the labor is less than the
The Company should continue the labor mix.
Requirement-3:
To calculate: Variable
Requirement-3:

Answer to Problem 14P
Solution: Variable overhead Rate and Efficiency variances are as follows:
Variable Overhead Rate Variance | $ 1,400.00 | Favorable |
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance | $ 1,225.00 | Unfavorable |
There is a direct positive relation between the Direct Labor Efficiency Variance and Variable overhead Efficiency Variance.
Explanation of Solution
Variable overhead Rate and Efficiency variances are calculated as follows:
Variable Overhead Rate Variance: | ||
Actual Rate (A) = (18200/5600 hours) | $ 3.25 | Per hour |
Standard Rate (B) | $ 3.50 | Per hour |
Actual hours (C) (35 employees *160 hours) | 5600 | Hours |
Variable Overhead Rate Variance = (A-B)*C = | $ 1,400.00 | Favorable |
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance: | ||
Actual hours (A) (35 employees *160 hours) | 5600 | Hours |
Standard Hours (B) (3750 units *1.4 hours) | 5250 | Hours |
Standard Rate (C) | $ 3.50 | Per hour |
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance =(A-B)*C = | $ 1,225.00 | Unfavorable |
There is a direct positive relation between the Direct Labor Efficiency Variance and Variable overhead Efficiency Variance. It means if the Direct Labor Efficiency Variance is unfavorable, then the Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance shall also be unfavorable.
There is a direct positive relation between the Direct Labor Efficiency Variance and Variable overhead Efficiency Variance.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING W/CONNECT
- In 2022, North Shore Community College had a total student body that was 5% more than in 2021, which was 5% more than in 2020. The enrollment in 2022 was 4,200. How many students attended the college in 2021? How many students attended the college in 2020?arrow_forwardWhen iam uploading it getting blurr comment i will write values. Don't answer with incorrect dataarrow_forwardSolve correctly if image is blurry comment..arrow_forward
- If data is not clear please commentarrow_forwardPlease don't use AI And give correct answer .arrow_forwardLouisa Pharmaceutical Company is a maker of drugs for high blood pressure and uses a process costing system. The following information pertains to the final department of Goodheart's blockbuster drug called Mintia. Beginning work-in-process (40% completed) 1,025 units Transferred-in 4,900 units Normal spoilage 445 units Abnormal spoilage 245 units Good units transferred out 4,500 units Ending work-in-process (1/3 completed) 735 units Conversion costs in beginning inventory $ 3,250 Current conversion costs $ 7,800 Louisa calculates separate costs of spoilage by computing both normal and abnormal spoiled units. Normal spoilage costs are reallocated to good units and abnormal spoilage costs are charged as a loss. The units of Mintia that are spoiled are the result of defects not discovered before inspection of finished units. Materials are added at the beginning of the process. Using the weighted-average method, answer the following question: What are the…arrow_forward
- General accountingarrow_forwardFinancial accounting questionarrow_forwardOn November 30, Sullivan Enterprises had Accounts Receivable of $145,600. During the month of December, the company received total payments of $175,000 from credit customers. The Accounts Receivable on December 31 was $98,200. What was the number of credit sales during December?arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





