Why should the review boards contain people who are not scientists?

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 10.9E

a.

To determine

To explain: Why should the review boards contain people who are not scientists?

a.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

The review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The institutional review boards of government regulations should consist of at least five people. One must be a scientist, one must be a non-scientist, and one must be outside the institution.

Justification:

For obtaining accurate and stable reviews of government regulations (about both the technical issue and non-technical issues of the institution) by the review boards, it must involve people who are not scientists.

Thus, the review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

b.

To determine

To explain: Whether one outside member is enough and explain how the member is chosen.

b.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

Yes, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Justification:

One outside member for the review board is enough as this member is selected virtually. Say, a medical doctor (who is not a scientist) would give the reviews that are not identified by the institution members.

Thus, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 10.9E

a.

To determine

To explain: Why should the review boards contain people who are not scientists?

a.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

The review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The institutional review boards of government regulations should consist of at least five people. One must be a scientist, one must be a non-scientist, and one must be outside the institution.

Justification:

For obtaining accurate and stable reviews of government regulations (about both the technical issue and non-technical issues of the institution) by the review boards, it must involve people who are not scientists.

Thus, the review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

b.

To determine

To explain: Whether one outside member is enough and explain how the member is chosen.

b.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

Yes, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Justification:

One outside member for the review board is enough as this member is selected virtually. Say, a medical doctor (who is not a scientist) would give the reviews that are not identified by the institution members.

Thus, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 10.9E

a.

To determine

To explain: Why should the review boards contain people who are not scientists?

a.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

The review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The institutional review boards of government regulations should consist of at least five people. One must be a scientist, one must be a non-scientist, and one must be outside the institution.

Justification:

For obtaining accurate and stable reviews of government regulations (about both the technical issue and non-technical issues of the institution) by the review boards, it must involve people who are not scientists.

Thus, the review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

b.

To determine

To explain: Whether one outside member is enough and explain how the member is chosen.

b.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

Yes, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Justification:

One outside member for the review board is enough as this member is selected virtually. Say, a medical doctor (who is not a scientist) would give the reviews that are not identified by the institution members.

Thus, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 10.9E

a.

To determine

To explain: Why should the review boards contain people who are not scientists?

a.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

The review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The institutional review boards of government regulations should consist of at least five people. One must be a scientist, one must be a non-scientist, and one must be outside the institution.

Justification:

For obtaining accurate and stable reviews of government regulations (about both the technical issue and non-technical issues of the institution) by the review boards, it must involve people who are not scientists.

Thus, the review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

b.

To determine

To explain: Whether one outside member is enough and explain how the member is chosen.

b.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

Yes, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Justification:

One outside member for the review board is enough as this member is selected virtually. Say, a medical doctor (who is not a scientist) would give the reviews that are not identified by the institution members.

Thus, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 10, Problem 10.9E

a.

To determine

To explain: Why should the review boards contain people who are not scientists?

a.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

The review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The institutional review boards of government regulations should consist of at least five people. One must be a scientist, one must be a non-scientist, and one must be outside the institution.

Justification:

For obtaining accurate and stable reviews of government regulations (about both the technical issue and non-technical issues of the institution) by the review boards, it must involve people who are not scientists.

Thus, the review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

b.

To determine

To explain: Whether one outside member is enough and explain how the member is chosen.

b.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

Yes, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Justification:

One outside member for the review board is enough as this member is selected virtually. Say, a medical doctor (who is not a scientist) would give the reviews that are not identified by the institution members.

Thus, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Answer 6

Chapter 10, Problem 10.9E

a.

To determine

To explain: Why should the review boards contain people who are not scientists?

a.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

The review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The institutional review boards of government regulations should consist of at least five people. One must be a scientist, one must be a non-scientist, and one must be outside the institution.

Justification:

For obtaining accurate and stable reviews of government regulations (about both the technical issue and non-technical issues of the institution) by the review boards, it must involve people who are not scientists.

Thus, the review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Answer 7

Chapter 10, Problem 10.9E

a.

To determine

To explain: Why should the review boards contain people who are not scientists?

Answer 8

a.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

The review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Answer 9

a.

Expert Solution

Answer 10

a.

Expert Solution

Answer 11

Expert Solution

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The institutional review boards of government regulations should consist of at least five people. One must be a scientist, one must be a non-scientist, and one must be outside the institution.

Justification:

For obtaining accurate and stable reviews of government regulations (about both the technical issue and non-technical issues of the institution) by the review boards, it must involve people who are not scientists.

Thus, the review boards contain people who are not scientists for getting accurate reviews.

Answer 13

b.

To determine

To explain: Whether one outside member is enough and explain how the member is chosen.

b.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

Yes, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Explanation of Solution

Justification:

One outside member for the review board is enough as this member is selected virtually. Say, a medical doctor (who is not a scientist) would give the reviews that are not identified by the institution members.

Thus, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Answer 14

b.

To determine

To explain: Whether one outside member is enough and explain how the member is chosen.

Answer 15

b.

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 10.9E

Yes, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.

Answer 16

b.

Expert Solution

Answer 17

b.

Expert Solution

Answer 18

Expert Solution

Answer 19

Explanation of Solution

Justification:

One outside member for the review board is enough as this member is selected virtually. Say, a medical doctor (who is not a scientist) would give the reviews that are not identified by the institution members.

Thus, one outside member is enough and a medical doctor can be chosen for giving reviews.