Judgment Case 10–8 Research and development • LO10–8 Prior to 1974, accepted practice was for companies to either expense or capitalize R&D costs. In 1974, the FASB issued a Standard that requires all research and development costs to be charged to expense when incurred. This was a controversial standard, opposed by many companies who preferred delaying the recognition of these expenses until later years when presumably the expenditures bear fruit. Several research studies have been conducted to determine if the Standard had any impact on the behavior of companies. One interesting finding was that, prior to 1974, companies that expensed R&D costs were significantly larger than those companies that capitalized R&D costs. Required: 1. Explain the FASB’s logic in deciding to require all companies to expense R&D costs in the period incurred. 2. Identify possible reasons to explain why, prior to 1974, companies that expensed R&D costs were significantly larger than those companies that capitalized R&D costs.
Judgment Case 10–8 Research and development • LO10–8 Prior to 1974, accepted practice was for companies to either expense or capitalize R&D costs. In 1974, the FASB issued a Standard that requires all research and development costs to be charged to expense when incurred. This was a controversial standard, opposed by many companies who preferred delaying the recognition of these expenses until later years when presumably the expenditures bear fruit. Several research studies have been conducted to determine if the Standard had any impact on the behavior of companies. One interesting finding was that, prior to 1974, companies that expensed R&D costs were significantly larger than those companies that capitalized R&D costs. Required: 1. Explain the FASB’s logic in deciding to require all companies to expense R&D costs in the period incurred. 2. Identify possible reasons to explain why, prior to 1974, companies that expensed R&D costs were significantly larger than those companies that capitalized R&D costs.
Solution Summary: The author explains the financial accounting standards board's logic in requiring all companies to expense R&D costs in the period incurred. Larger firms prefer to use accounting methods which would help them in reporting reduced income.
Prior to 1974, accepted practice was for companies to either expense or capitalize R&D costs. In 1974, the FASB issued a Standard that requires all research and development costs to be charged to expense when incurred. This was a controversial standard, opposed by many companies who preferred delaying the recognition of these expenses until later years when presumably the expenditures bear fruit. Several research studies have been conducted to determine if the Standard had any impact on the behavior of companies. One interesting finding was that, prior to 1974, companies that expensed R&D costs were significantly larger than those companies that capitalized R&D costs.
Required:
1. Explain the FASB’s logic in deciding to require all companies to expense R&D costs in the period incurred.
2. Identify possible reasons to explain why, prior to 1974, companies that expensed R&D costs were significantly larger than those companies that capitalized R&D costs.
Please provide the accurate answer to this general accounting problem using appropriate methods.
I need help finding the accurate solution to this general accounting problem with valid methods.
Joe transferred the following assets to JH Corporation.
Basis to Transferor
FMV
Cash
$120,000
$120,000
Machinery
$48,000
$36,000
Land
$108,000
$144,000
In exchange, Joe received 50% of JH Corporation’s only class of stock outstanding. The stock has no established value. However, all parties believe that the value of the stock Joe received is the equivalent of the value of the assets she transferred. The only other shareholder, Ethan, formed JH Corporation five years ago.
Joe has no gain or loss on the transfer.
JH Corporation has a basis of $48,000 in the machinery and $108,000 in the land.
JH Corporation has a basis of $36,000 in the machinery and $144,000 in the land.
Joe has a basis of $276,000 in the stock of JH Corporation.e. None of the above.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.