That failure to detect life on a planet means to astrobiology.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 1, Problem 20TYU

To determine

That failure to detect life on a planet means to astrobiology.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Imagine that we discovered a new planet that has the potential to support life. This planet has plenty of water on its surface and carbon dioxide in its atmosphere, and a nice, comfortable temperature similar to Earth. The only difference is that this planet orbits a star that produces green light only. If we took some plants from Earth and planted them on this new planet, would our plants be able to grow? Explain your answer.

Which of the following seems least reasonable regarding life on Earth? Group of answer choices There is much scientific evidence suggesting that all creatures living on Earth today appear to have evolved from a common ancestor. Louis Pasteur discredited the concept of spontaneous generation by demonstrating that even bacteria and other microorganisms arise from parents resembling themselves. There is ample physical evidence that the earliest life forms on Earth were multicellular creatures, perhaps resembling some of our primitive fish. When the earth formed some 4.6 billion years ago, it was a lifeless, inhospitable place. Before the mid-17th century, most people believed that God had created humankind and other higher organisms and that insects, frogs, and other small creatures could arise spontaneously in mud or decaying matter About billion years into its development, the Earth it was teeming with organisms resembling blue-green algae.

A radio broadcast left Earth in 1911. How far in light years has it traveled? If there is, on average, 1 star system per 400 cubic light years, how many star systems has this broadcast reached? Assume that the fraction of these star systems that have planets is 0.50 and that, in a given planetary system, the average number of planets that have orbited in the habitable zone for 4 billion years is 0.20. How many possible planets with life could have heard this signal?