EBK PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780073534701
Author: Frank
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 1, Problem 1RQ
To determine
Explain the statement ‘the private classes are better than the group classes’.
Expert Solution & Answer
Explanation of Solution
In general, the benefits from private lessons are greater than attending group lessons. People those who do not care about the time of learning tennis will attend group lessons and spend what they save on other things. Thus, the private lessons are more costly than group lessons.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Ana and Ivan each individually and simultaneously decide whether to spend the evening at a play or a concert. Ana prefers to attend the concert twice as much without Ivan than to attend the play without him, and she prefers this three times more than being in the same place with Ivan (and at that point, she doesn't care where they are). Ivan prefers being in the same place with Ana twice as much as being at the play without her, and he prefers this four times more than being without Ana at the concert. Both have von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) preferences. With what probability will Ivan choose to attend the concert in Nashe's equilibrium?
You have two options for how to spend the afternoon. You can either go see a movie with your roommate or work as a tutor for the Math
Department. From experience, you know that going to see a movie gives you $20 worth of enjoyment, and with your student discount, a movie ticket
only costs $12. If you spend the afternoon working as a math tutor, you will get paid $45. On a typical day, you wouldn't be willing to spend the
afternoon working as a math tutor for less than $35. What is your opportunity cost of seeing a movie this afternoon?
Select one:
O a. $57
O b. $12
○ c. $22
○ d. $8
You are considering whether you should go out to dinner at a restaurant with your friend. The meal is expected to cost you $40, you typically leave a 20% tip, and an Uber will cost you $5 to get there. You value the restaurant meal at $20. You enjoy your friend’s company and are willing to pay $30 just to spend an evening with her. If you did not go out to the restaurant, you would eat at home using groceries that cost you $8. How much are the benefits and costs associated with going out to dinner with your friend? Should you go out to dinner with your friend?
Chapter 1 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Van has plans to go to an opera and already has a $100 nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable ticket. Now Amy, whom Van has wanted to date for a long time, asks him to a party. Van would prefer to go to the party with Amy and forgo the opera, but he doesn't want to waste the $100 he spent on the opera ticket. From the perspective of an economist, if Van decides to go to the party with Amy, what has he just done? 1. Incorrectly allowed a sunk cost to influence his decision 2. Made a choice that was not optimal 3 Correctly ignored a sunk cost Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardJamal has a very flexible summer job. He works every day but is allowed to take a day off anytime he wants. His friend Don suggests they take off work on Tuesday to go to the amusement park. The admission charge for the amusement park is $15 per person, and it will cost them $5 each for gas and parking. Jamal loves amusement parks and a day at the park is worth $40 to him. However, Jamal also enjoys his job so much that he would actually be willing to pay $5 per day maximum to do it a) If Jamal earns $10 if he works, what is the cost and benefit of going to the park? Should he go to the amusement park?arrow_forwardOne type of systematic error arises because people tend to think of benefits in percentage terms rather than in absolute dollar amounts. As an example, Samir is willing to drive 20 minutes out of his way to save $4 on a grocery item that costs $10 at a local market. But he is unwilling to drive 20 minutes out of his way to save $10 on a laptop that costs $400 at a local store. In percentage terms, how big is the savings on the grocery item? On the laptop? In absolute terms, how big is the savings on the grocery item? On the laptop? If Samir is willing to sacrifice 20 minutes of his time to save $4 in one case, shouldn't he also be willing to sacrifice 20 minutes of his time to save $10?arrow_forward
- You must allocate the 70,000 seats in Reliant Stadium (in Houston) among Texan (Houston) and Cowboy (Dallas) fans for an upcoming game between the two footfall teams. You can set different prices for seats in the Dallas and Houston sections of the stadium. Suppose you can obtain $40/ticket from Houston fans irrespective of the number of seats you allocate to Houston fans. You must drop price in order to sell more tickets to Dallas fans, however. Let Q be the number of tickets you allocate to Dallas fans. Assume that the maximum price you can charge for these tickets is given by the following inverse demand function P= 80 500 (a) Express the total revenue (on all 70,000 seats) from ticket sales as a function of Q; (b) Derive the first-order condition of the revenue-maximizing problem (it's a function about Q); (c) What is the optimal number of seats allocated to Dallas fans?arrow_forwardSolve all this question......you will not solve all questions then I will give you down?? upvote......arrow_forwardMika earns $379 per week which she spends entirely at the grocery store, purchasing either food or alcohol. The price of food is $1/unit, while the price of alcohol is $4/unit. Mika receives an additional $50/week in food stamps that can only be only be used to buy food at the grocery store (so, this money could be used to buy food but NOT alcohol). Mika knows someone who will give her cash in exchange these food stamps at a rate of $0.50 in cash for every $1 in food. stamps. Cash, of course, can be used to buy either food or alcohol. What is the vertical coordinate of the vertical intercept of Mika's budget constraint if she were to graph quantity of food on the horizontal axis and quantity of alcohol on the vertical axis? (Note: The answer may not be a whole number, so round to the nearest hundredth)arrow_forward
- You are on a cruise in the Caribbean Sea, which cost $1,000. On this particular day you have the choice between two activities, both of which would provide marginal mental benefits to your state of mind. The first is a scuba diving trip whose cost was included in the price of the cruise (you get to swim with a school of hammerheads). The second is a shopping spree on St. Thomas that would cost you $500. Which costs and benefits (select all that apply) should you consider when deciding which activity to undergo? The $1,000 cost of the cruise. All of the above. The marginal benefits of the shopping trip. The $500 cost of the shopping trip. The marginal benefits of the scuba trip.arrow_forwardSuppose you observe a person's answer to two decision problems. Problem 1: You are offered $40 today. What is the minimum amount x you demand one month from today in order to be willing to give up the $40 now? Answer: x = 52. Problem 2: Your are offered $40 today. What is the minimum amount x you demand one year from today in order to be willing to give up the $40 now? Answer: $60. 1. Demonstrate that the rational model of time preferences is violated for this choice pattern. 2. Derive this individual's B and d for the hyperbolic time discounting model. 3. Suppose the utility you get from eating ice cream now is 10 utils. But you pay a cost of -4 utils per hour for the next 4 hours, because it gives you indigestion and makes you feel lethargic. If your hourly B and d for this problem are B = .6 and d = .9, ... 1. What is the total discounted utility of eating ice cream now? 2. What is your total discounted utility now of planning to eat ice cream after lunch tomorrow? 3. Do you eat ice…arrow_forwardHow do I calculate this?arrow_forward
- For the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) c) Assume that Kim has preferences Uk (Xk, Yk) = 3Xk + 3Yk and Jung has preferences Uj (Xj, Yj) = Xj + 3Yj. Will Kim and Jung trade? Calculate the general equilibrium allocation for Kim and Jung. Compute the utility at the endowment point and at the general equilibrium allocation. Is the new allocation on the contract curve?arrow_forwardFor the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) a) Illustrate the initial endowment in an Edgeworth box. Clearly label the axes and explain the dimensions of the box. Show the indifference curve each of them is on at the endowment point. b) Consider an allocation where Kim gets (xk, yk) = (40,40) and Jung gets the remaining Ferraris and VR headsets. Show where this point is in the Edgeworth box. Is this allocation Pareto efficient? Is it equitable? How likely is this to arise in practice?arrow_forwardFor the rest of this question consider a two goods economy where Kim and Jung can trade Ferraris (good x) and VR headsets (good y) with each other. Kim and Jung both enjoy driving Ferraris and having more VR headsets (so more friends can play the same game). They start at the same (high) level of income. Kim has an initial endowment of (x0k, y0k) = (10,30) and Jung has an initial endowment of (x0j, y0j) = (30,10) d) Assume that a social planner could redistribute initial wealth (the amounts of ? and ? that Kim and Jung have). Can they reallocate resources so that Kim and Jung reach the allocation (Xk, Yk) = (20,20) and (Xj, Yj) = (20,20) as a general equilibrium (i.e. post-trade) allocation? Can the social planner redistribute resources to make the allocation where Jung owns all the resources in the economy a general equilibrium allocation?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning