a.
The implicit cost of a ton of greenhouse gas.
a.
Explanation of Solution
The reduced greehouse gases per year can be calculated as follows.
The reduced greehouse gases per year is 3,100,000.
The implicit cost of a ton of greenhouse gas can be calculated as follows.
The implicit cost of greenhouse gas per year is $387.10 per ton.
b.
The cost to reduce the total emission by 3% over next five years.
b.
Explanation of Solution
The reduced greehouse gases per year can be calculated as follows.
The reduced greehouse gases per year is 90,000,000.
The cost to reduce the total emission can be calculated as follows.
The cost to reduce the total emission by 3% over next five years is $340,870,000,000.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 1 Solutions
Engineering Economy, Student Value Edition (17th Edition)
- Air pollution in the country of Gawanza has grown over the last ten years with an increase in manufacturing industries. The government of Gawanza now has a plan to reduce the CO2 emissions into the air by 10% per year over the next 10 years. What do you expect will happen? The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be lowest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be lowest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost of reducing CO2 will be the highest and marginal benefits of reducing CO2 will be the lowest in year ten. The marginal cost of reducing CO2 will be the highest and marginal benefits of reducing CO2 will be the lowest in year ten. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing CO2 will be highest in the last few years of implementing this plan. The marginal cost and marginal benefits to Gawanza of reducing…arrow_forward4 Time remaining: 00:09:27 Economics Hurdle rates (minimum required rates of return) are often used by development banks such as the World Bank. Suppose the World Bank hurdle rate is 3%. The World bank is currently evaluating a carbon investment in Brazil that will require 1.35 million dollars given to Brazil now, in return for Brazil setting aside forest land and then returning 2.0 million dollars back to a carbon credit owned by the bank in 10 years. The world bank has already paid 1 million dollars in the past two years to set up a carbon payment fund that can generally be used for these purposes. Will the following investment in this carbon market make sense for the World Bank? A. No because the rate of return is equal to 2.4% B. No, because the opportunity cost of waiting is too high C. Yes, because the ratio of benefits to costs is greater than 3% D. Yes, because the rate of return is equal to 4.0%arrow_forwardPart 1. Imagine you have a diesel-powered car, and you can buy either diesel or biodiesel fuel (which is possible in some parts of the US). The cost of biodiesel is $38/GJ, and the biodiesel causes 22 kg CO2 emissions per GJ over its lifetime. The diesel costs $30/GJ and causes 88 kg CO2 emissions per GJ over its lifetime (4 times more!!). Part 1: What is the cost of mitigation of choosing biodiesel? Part 2. What carbon tax would be required to make the biodiesel cost the same as the diesel?arrow_forward
- As an energy source, fossil fuels have had an advantage because of their ["low", "high"] cost and relatively high ["availability", "net energy", "suitability"] , a measure of available energy after accounting for the energy involved in extraction and production. This has resulted in approximately ["60", "40", "80", "20"] percent of the world’s energy currently being provided by fossil fuels.arrow_forwardGermany is trying to lower its CO2 emissions by phasing out coal-based electricity production through the forced closure of coal power plants. Why is this policy, even if it is successful in lowering Germany’s CO2 emissions, unlikely to result in lower emissions at the European scale?a) this policy does nothing to address the emissions from the transportation sector, which far outweigh those of coalb) CO2 produced in Germany stays in Germany, and thus has no bearing on the European scalec) Germany has already made substantial reductions to its CO2 output, so that it is a small player on the European scaled) Germany is a member of the European Emissions Trading System (ETS), which sets a binding cap on greenhouse gas emissionse) coal power production in Germany has become extremely efficient, so that its CO2 footprint is insubstantialarrow_forwardDraw a diagram of the marginal abatement cost curve described by: MAC = 100 - 2E. What is the uncontrolled level of emissions? What is the marginal abatement cost of the 40thunit of abatement? What is the total abatement cost of 40 units of abatement?arrow_forward
- 2. You are preparing to market this year's calf crop and want to decide if you would like to precondition your calves this year. If you decided to sell your calves at weaning, you would expect to market them at approximately 425 at price of $1.80 per pound. Alternatively, you have the option to precondition your calves for 45 days in a dry lot, castrate your bulls, and provide a round of vaccinations. You expect that the additional 45 days of feeding will get your calves up to a market weight of 550 pounds. Under normal circumstances, these calves would bring $1.65 per pound at the sale barn, but you also expect that you can charge a 6% preconditioning premium at the time of sale because you are marketing them directly. a. What is the final sale price for the 550 pound preconditioned calves? b. What is the value of gain for the preconditioned calves? c. If your cost of gain over the 45-day preconditioning period is $1.45 what would be your net profit on these calves?arrow_forwardDecisions for Tomorrow Calculate the annual household cost of a carbon-free program if the program costs $6.4 trillion evenly spread over 10 years (assume there are 110 million households). Instructions: Round your response to the nearest whole number. $___________ per household per yeararrow_forwardA cement factory is located near a river which is also used for training sessions by a team of swimmers. When the factory dumps chemicals in the water, the river cannot be used for swimming. Experts estimate that it would cost $100,000 to install a purifying equipment that would completely eliminate the chemicals from the river. Moving the swimming team to train at a different location would cost $90,000 and thus the purifying equipment would not be necessary. 2.1. Identify the 2 externalities. 2.2. What result (theorem) can be applied to fix these externalities? Why might this theorem work in this case? 2.3. What solution would the two parties choose if the right to a clean river is granted to the swimming team and who would bear the costs of fixing the externality problem?arrow_forward
- E2: complete the following using the graph.arrow_forward8-3arrow_forward"Examine the economic impacts of implementing a carbon tax as a policy measure to combat climate change. Discuss how a carbon tax might influence consumer behavior, energy production, and technological innovation. Additionally, evaluate the potential effects on global trade patterns and the distribution of income. between different socioeconomic groups within a country."arrow_forward
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning