![Loose Leaf for Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781260152647/9781260152647_largeCoverImage.gif)
Concept explainers
a.
Compute the differences of the sales between October 2015 and October 2014.
List the manufacturers for whom, the sales in 2015 increased as compared to 2014.
List the manufacturers for whom, the sales in 2015 decreased as compared to 2014.
a.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 17CE
The differences of the sales between October 2015 and October 2014 are as follows:
Manufacturer | Through October 2015 | Through October 2014 | Difference |
General Motors Corp. | 2,562,840 | 2,434,707 | 128,133 |
Ford Motor Company | 2,178,587 | 2,065,612 | 112,975 |
Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. | 2,071,446 | 1,975,368 | 96,078 |
Chrysler | 1,814,268 | 1,687,313 | 12,6955 |
American Honda Motor Co Inc. | 1,320,217 | 1,281,777 | 38,440 |
Nissan North America Inc. | 1,238,535 | 1,166,389 | 72,146 |
Hyundai Motor America | 638,195 | 607,539 | 30,656 |
Kia Motors America Inc. | 526,024 | 489,711 | 36,313 |
Subaru of America Inc. | 480,331 | 418,497 | 61,834 |
Volkswagen of America Inc. | 294,602 | 301,187 | –6,585 |
Mercedes-Benz | 301,915 | 281,728 | 20,187 |
BMW of North America Inc. | 279,395 | 267,193 | 12,202 |
Mazda Motor of America Inc. | 267,158 | 259,751 | 7,407 |
Audi of America Inc. | 165,103 | 146,133 | 18,970 |
Mitsubishi Motors N A, Inc. | 80,683 | 64,564 | 16,119 |
Volvo | 53,803 | 47,823 | 5,980 |
Land Rover ** | 55,602 | 42,067 | 13,535 |
Fiat | 35,576 | 39,226 | –3,650 |
Porsche Cars NA Inc. | 43,370 | 39,033 | 4,337 |
Jaguar * | 12,204 | 12,837 | –633 |
Tesla * | 17,350 | 15,500 | 1,850 |
Mini * | 49,061 | 44,488 | 4,573 |
Maserati * | 9,544 | 10,327 | –783 |
Smart * | 6,153 | 8,665 | –2,512 |
Bentley * | 1,917 | 2,268 | –351 |
Ferrari * | 1,903 | 1,739 | 164 |
Rolls Royce * | 701 | 682 | 19 |
Lamborghini * | 866 | 494 | 372 |
The manufacturers for whom, the sales in 2015 increased as compared to 2014 are as follows:
Manufacturer | Through October 2015 | Through October 2014 | Difference |
General Motors Corp. | 2,562,840 | 2,434,707 | 128,133 |
Ford Motor Company | 2,178,587 | 2,065,612 | 112,975 |
Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. | 2,071,446 | 1,975,368 | 96,078 |
Chrysler | 1,814,268 | 1,687,313 | 12,6955 |
American Honda Motor Co Inc. | 1,320,217 | 1,281,777 | 38,440 |
Nissan North America Inc. | 1,238,535 | 1,166,389 | 72,146 |
Hyundai Motor America | 638,195 | 607,539 | 30,656 |
Kia Motors America Inc. | 526,024 | 489,711 | 36,313 |
Subaru of America Inc. | 480,331 | 418,497 | 61,834 |
Mercedes-Benz | 301,915 | 281,728 | 20,187 |
BMW of North America Inc. | 279,395 | 267,193 | 12,202 |
Mazda Motor of America Inc. | 267,158 | 259,751 | 7,407 |
Audi of America Inc. | 165,103 | 146,133 | 18,970 |
Mitsubishi Motors N A, Inc. | 80,683 | 64,564 | 16,119 |
Volvo | 53,803 | 47,823 | 5,980 |
Land Rover ** | 55,602 | 42,067 | 13,535 |
Porsche Cars NA Inc. | 43,370 | 39,033 | 4,337 |
Tesla * | 17,350 | 15,500 | 1,850 |
Mini * | 49,061 | 44,488 | 4,573 |
Ferrari * | 1,903 | 1,739 | 164 |
Rolls Royce * | 701 | 682 | 19 |
Lamborghini * | 866 | 494 | 372 |
The manufacturers for whom, the sales in 2015 decreased as compared to 2014 are as follows:
Manufacturer | Through October 2015 | Through October 2014 | Difference |
Volkswagen of America Inc. | 294,602 | 301,187 | –6,585 |
Fiat | 35,576 | 39,226 | –3,650 |
Jaguar * | 12,204 | 12,837 | –633 |
Maserati * | 9,544 | 10,327 | –783 |
Smart * | 6,153 | 8,665 | –2,512 |
Bentley * | 1,917 | 2,268 | –351 |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The manufacturers for whom, data is missing for one or both the years are ignored.
Step-by-step procedure to calculate the differences of the sales between October 2015 and October 2014 using EXCEL is given below:
- Type the headings Manufacturer, Through October 2015, and Through October 2014, in cells A1, B1 and C1 respectively.
- Enter the manufacturers’ names in cells A2 to A29; the data for 2015 in cells B2 to B29; enter the data for 2014 in cells C2 to C29.
- Type the heading Difference in cell D1.
- Type the formula =B2-C2 in cell D2, and press Enter.
- Drag the cell till cell D29.
Thus, the differences are obtained using EXCEL.
The manufacturers with positive differences are the ones, for whom, the sales in 2015 increased as compared to 2014.
The manufacturers with negative differences are the ones, for whom, the sales in 2015 decreased as compared to 2014.
These can be identified from the list of differences obtained using software.
b.
Compute the percentage changes in sales between October 2015 and October 2014 and list them in an ascending order.
List the top 5 manufacturers in terms of percentage change.
List the bottom 5 manufacturers in terms of percentage change.
b.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 17CE
The percentage changes in sales between October 2015 and October 2014 in an ascending order are as follows:
Manufacturer | Through October 2015 | Through October 2014 | Percentage change (%) |
Smart * | 6,153 | 8,665 | –28.99 |
Bentley * | 1,917 | 2,268 | –15.48 |
Fiat | 35,576 | 39,226 | –9.31 |
Maserati * | 9,544 | 10,327 | –7.58 |
Jaguar * | 12,204 | 12,837 | –4.93 |
Volkswagen of America Inc. | 2,94,602 | 3,01,187 | –2.19 |
Rolls Royce * | 701 | 682 | 2.79 |
Mazda Motor of America Inc. | 2,67,158 | 2,59,751 | 2.85 |
American Honda Motor Co Inc. | 1,320,217 | 1,281,777 | 3.00 |
BMW of North America Inc. | 279,395 | 267,193 | 4.57 |
Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. | 2,071,446 | 1.975,368 | 4.86 |
Hyundai Motor America | 638,195 | 607,539 | 5.05 |
General Motors Corp. | 2,562,840 | 2,434,707 | 5.26 |
Ford Motor Company | 2,178,587 | 2,065,612 | 5.47 |
Nissan North America Inc. | 1,238,535 | 1,166,389 | 6.19 |
Mercedes-Benz | 301,915 | 281,728 | 7.17 |
Kia Motors America Inc. | 526,024 | 489,711 | 7.42 |
Chrysler | 1,814,268 | 1,687,313 | 7.52 |
Ferrari * | 1,903 | 1,739 | 9.43 |
Mini * | 49,061 | 44,488 | 10.28 |
Porsche Cars NA Inc. | 43,370 | 39,033 | 11.11 |
Tesla * | 17,350 | 15,500 | 11.94 |
Volvo | 53,803 | 47,823 | 12.50 |
Audi of America Inc. | 165,103 | 146,133 | 12.98 |
Subaru of America Inc. | 480,331 | 418,497 | 14.78 |
Mitsubishi Motors N A, Inc. | 80,683 | 64,564 | 24.97 |
Land Rover ** | 55,602 | 42,067 | 32.17 |
Lamborghini * | 866 | 494 | 75.30 |
The top 5 manufacturers in terms of percentage change are as follows:
Manufacturer | Through October 2015 | Through October 2014 | Percentage change (%) |
Lamborghini * | 866 | 494 | 75.30 |
Land Rover ** | 55,602 | 42,067 | 32.17 |
Mitsubishi Motors N A, Inc. | 80,683 | 64,564 | 24.97 |
Subaru of America Inc. | 480,331 | 418,497 | 14.78 |
Audi of America Inc. | 165,103 | 146,133 | 12.98 |
The bottom 5 manufacturers in terms of percentage change are as follows:
Manufacturer | Through October 2015 | Through October 2014 | Percentage change (%) |
Smart * | 6,153 | 8,665 | –28.99 |
Bentley * | 1,917 | 2,268 | –15.48 |
Fiat | 35,576 | 39,226 | –9.31 |
Maserati * | 9,544 | 10,327 | –7.58 |
Jaguar * | 12,204 | 12,837 | –4.93 |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Step-by-step procedure to calculate the percentage changes of the sales between October 2015 and October 2014 and to sort the changes using EXCEL is given below:
- Type the heading Percentage change in cell E1.
- Type the formula =(D2/C2)*100 in cell E2, and press Enter.
- Drag the cell till cell E29.
- Select the values in cells E2 to E29 and choose Editing > Sort & Filter > Sort Smallest to Largest > Expand Selection > OK.
Thus, the sorted percentage changes are obtained using EXCEL.
The manufacturers with the top 5 and bottom 5 percentage changes can be identified from the list of percentage changes obtained using software.
c.
Draw a bar graph of the data in 2014 and 2015, sorted with respect to 2015 for the top 12 manufacturers.
Draw a bar graph of the percentage changes, sorted with respect to 2015 for the top 12 manufacturers.
c.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Answer to Problem 17CE
The bar graph of the data in 2014 and 2015, sorted with respect to 2015 for the top 12 manufacturers is as follows:
The bar graph of the percentage changes, sorted with respect to 2015 for the top 12 manufacturers is as follows:
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The data are already sorted with respect to 2015. The observations in rows 2 to 13, under columns A to E, correspond to the top 12 companies.
Step-by-step procedure to bar graph of the data in 2014 and 2015, sorted with respect to 2015 for the top 12 manufacturers using EXCEL is given below:
- Select cells A1 to C13.
- Choose Insert > Insert Column or Bar Chart > 2-D Column > Clustered Column.
Thus, the bar graph of the data in 2014 and 2015, sorted with respect to 2015 for the top 12 manufacturers is obtained using EXCEL.
Step-by-step procedure to bar graph of the percentage changes, sorted with respect to 2015 for the top 12 manufacturers using EXCEL is given below:
- Select cells A1 to A13, and E1 to E13.
- Choose Insert > Insert Column or Bar Chart > 2-D Column > Clustered Column.
Thus, the bar graph of the percentage changes, sorted with respect to 2015 for the top 12 manufacturers is obtained using EXCEL.
From the first bar graph, it can be observed that for most of the top 12 companies, the bars are higher for 2015 than for 2014, which indicates that the sales have increased from 2014 to 2015. However, for the 10th company in the list, the sales have slightly decreased in 2015, as compared to 2014, as suggested by the heights of the bars.
From the second bar graph, it can be observed that the sales have increased by 4% to 6%, from 2014 to 2015, for most of the top 12 companies. However, aa few notable differences are also observed. The sales for the 5th company on the list have increased only by about 3%. The sales for the 10th company on the list has, in fact, reduced by about 2%. The ales of the 9th company on the list has increased by approximately 15%, which is quite high as compared to the others.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 1 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics
- What do you guess are the standard deviations of the two distributions in the previous example problem?arrow_forwardPlease answer the questionsarrow_forward30. An individual who has automobile insurance from a certain company is randomly selected. Let Y be the num- ber of moving violations for which the individual was cited during the last 3 years. The pmf of Y isy | 1 2 4 8 16p(y) | .05 .10 .35 .40 .10 a.Compute E(Y).b. Suppose an individual with Y violations incurs a surcharge of $100Y^2. Calculate the expected amount of the surcharge.arrow_forward
- 24. An insurance company offers its policyholders a num- ber of different premium payment options. For a ran- domly selected policyholder, let X = the number of months between successive payments. The cdf of X is as follows: F(x)=0.00 : x < 10.30 : 1≤x<30.40 : 3≤ x < 40.45 : 4≤ x <60.60 : 6≤ x < 121.00 : 12≤ x a. What is the pmf of X?b. Using just the cdf, compute P(3≤ X ≤6) and P(4≤ X).arrow_forward59. At a certain gas station, 40% of the customers use regular gas (A1), 35% use plus gas (A2), and 25% use premium (A3). Of those customers using regular gas, only 30% fill their tanks (event B). Of those customers using plus, 60% fill their tanks, whereas of those using premium, 50% fill their tanks.a. What is the probability that the next customer will request plus gas and fill the tank (A2 B)?b. What is the probability that the next customer fills the tank?c. If the next customer fills the tank, what is the probability that regular gas is requested? Plus? Premium?arrow_forward38. Possible values of X, the number of components in a system submitted for repair that must be replaced, are 1, 2, 3, and 4 with corresponding probabilities .15, .35, .35, and .15, respectively. a. Calculate E(X) and then E(5 - X).b. Would the repair facility be better off charging a flat fee of $75 or else the amount $[150/(5 - X)]? [Note: It is not generally true that E(c/Y) = c/E(Y).]arrow_forward
- 74. The proportions of blood phenotypes in the U.S. popula- tion are as follows:A B AB O .40 .11 .04 .45 Assuming that the phenotypes of two randomly selected individuals are independent of one another, what is the probability that both phenotypes are O? What is the probability that the phenotypes of two randomly selected individuals match?arrow_forward53. A certain shop repairs both audio and video compo- nents. Let A denote the event that the next component brought in for repair is an audio component, and let B be the event that the next component is a compact disc player (so the event B is contained in A). Suppose that P(A) = .6 and P(B) = .05. What is P(BA)?arrow_forward26. A certain system can experience three different types of defects. Let A;(i = 1,2,3) denote the event that the sys- tem has a defect of type i. Suppose thatP(A1) = .12 P(A) = .07 P(A) = .05P(A, U A2) = .13P(A, U A3) = .14P(A2 U A3) = .10P(A, A2 A3) = .011Rshelfa. What is the probability that the system does not havea type 1 defect?b. What is the probability that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects?c. What is the probability that the system has both type 1 and type 2 defects but not a type 3 defect? d. What is the probability that the system has at most two of these defects?arrow_forward
- The following are suggested designs for group sequential studies. Using PROCSEQDESIGN, provide the following for the design O’Brien Fleming and Pocock.• The critical boundary values for each analysis of the data• The expected sample sizes at each interim analysisAssume the standardized Z score method for calculating boundaries.Investigators are evaluating the success rate of a novel drug for treating a certain type ofbacterial wound infection. Since no existing treatment exists, they have planned a one-armstudy. They wish to test whether the success rate of the drug is better than 50%, whichthey have defined as the null success rate. Preliminary testing has estimated the successrate of the drug at 55%. The investigators are eager to get the drug into production andwould like to plan for 9 interim analyses (10 analyzes in total) of the data. Assume thesignificance level is 5% and power is 90%.Besides, draw a combined boundary plot (OBF, POC, and HP)arrow_forwardPlease provide the solution for the attached image in detailed.arrow_forward20 km, because GISS Worksheet 10 Jesse runs a small business selling and delivering mealie meal to the spaza shops. He charges a fixed rate of R80, 00 for delivery and then R15, 50 for each packet of mealle meal he delivers. The table below helps him to calculate what to charge his customers. 10 20 30 40 50 Packets of mealie meal (m) Total costs in Rands 80 235 390 545 700 855 (c) 10.1. Define the following terms: 10.1.1. Independent Variables 10.1.2. Dependent Variables 10.2. 10.3. 10.4. 10.5. Determine the independent and dependent variables. Are the variables in this scenario discrete or continuous values? Explain What shape do you expect the graph to be? Why? Draw a graph on the graph provided to represent the information in the table above. TOTAL COST OF PACKETS OF MEALIE MEAL 900 800 700 600 COST (R) 500 400 300 200 100 0 10 20 30 40 60 NUMBER OF PACKETS OF MEALIE MEALarrow_forward
- Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1AlgebraISBN:9780395977224Author:Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. ColePublisher:McDougal LittellElementary AlgebraAlgebraISBN:9780998625713Author:Lynn Marecek, MaryAnne Anthony-SmithPublisher:OpenStax - Rice University
- Intermediate AlgebraAlgebraISBN:9781285195728Author:Jerome E. Kaufmann, Karen L. SchwittersPublisher:Cengage LearningAlgebra for College StudentsAlgebraISBN:9781285195780Author:Jerome E. Kaufmann, Karen L. SchwittersPublisher:Cengage LearningGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780395977224/9780395977224_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780998625713/9780998625713_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168994/9781938168994_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285195728/9781285195728_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285195780/9781285195780_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)