Ethical Case Study: Case Summary: A fertilizer manufacturing company wishing to relocate to County Y. The company has got a report from previously fired researcher stating that a toxic by-product is released by the company. This report is suppressed and a new fabricated report in favour of the company is prepared and presented to the representative of the County Y, showing no problem with the fertilizer. To Discuss: Whether the Chief executive officer of the company should reveal the content of the unfavourable report to the County Y representatives or not.
Ethical Case Study: Case Summary: A fertilizer manufacturing company wishing to relocate to County Y. The company has got a report from previously fired researcher stating that a toxic by-product is released by the company. This report is suppressed and a new fabricated report in favour of the company is prepared and presented to the representative of the County Y, showing no problem with the fertilizer. To Discuss: Whether the Chief executive officer of the company should reveal the content of the unfavourable report to the County Y representatives or not.
Solution Summary: The author explains that a fertilizer manufacturing company's unfavourable report is suppressed and presented to the County Y representative.
A fertilizer manufacturing company wishing to relocate to County Y. The company has got a report from previously fired researcher stating that a toxic by-product is released by the company. This report is suppressed and a new fabricated report in favour of the company is prepared and presented to the representative of the County Y, showing no problem with the fertilizer.
To Discuss: Whether the Chief executive officer of the company should reveal the content of the unfavourable report to the County Y representatives or not.