Microeconomics (6th Edition)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134106243
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 1, Problem 1.1.10PA
To determine
Decision regarding drop psychology course.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
When Paul Samuelson switched from physics to economics, Robert Solow is said to have remarked that the average IQ in
both disciplines went up. A bystander responded that Solow's claim must be wrong because it implies that the average IQ
for academia as a whole (which is a weighted average of the average IQ levels for each discipline) must also have gone
up as a result of the switch, which is clearly impossible.
Was the bystander right?
A) Yes. If the average in both disciplines goes up then the population average must also rise.
B) No. There is not enough information about the average IQ for the population.
C) Yes. The weights may change so that the population average also increases.
D) No. If those in physics had IQs above average and those in economics has IQs below average, then the population
average need not have changed.
Daniel Kahneman and the late Amos Tversky are considered to be the founders of modern behavioural economics and finance. In recognition of their work, Kahneman was awarded the Nobel prize in economics in 2002.
Reflect on the following points:
Are economic agents rational? and What can psychology teach us that will enable us to understand and possibly predict, economic agents’ behaviour?
How can “heuristics and biases” have an effect on economic decisions?
To what extent is Kahneman’s work relevant to financial decisions?
Suppose you and your brother go out for dinner. Your brother orders a cheeseburger and fries. When the food first arrives, you ask your brother if you can have a few fries. He looks at you like you're crazy, and says, "No!" Then a few minutes later, after you've both started eating, you ask again, and your brother reluctantly says, "Sure. Go ahead." An economist's explanation for your brother's change of heart is most likely to be that
your brother's marginal utility from eating additional french fries declines as he eats more of them, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few.
your brother's total utility increases as he eats more french fries, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few.
your brother's marginal utility from eating additional french fries increases as he eats more of them, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few.
your brother's total utility declines as he eats more french fries, so…
Chapter 1 Solutions
Microeconomics (6th Edition)
Ch. 1.A - Prob. 1PACh. 1.A - Prob. 2PACh. 1.A - Prob. 3PACh. 1.A - Prob. 4PACh. 1.A - Prob. 5PACh. 1.A - What is the area of the triangle shown in the...Ch. 1.A - Prob. 7PACh. 1 - Prob. 1TCCh. 1 - Prob. 2TCCh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.1RQ
Ch. 1 - Prob. 1.1.2RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.3PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.4PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.5PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.6PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.7PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.8PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.9PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.10PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.1.11PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.1RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.2RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.3RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.4RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.5PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.6PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.7PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.8PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.9PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.10PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.11PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.12PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.2.13PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.1RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.2RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.3RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.4PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.5PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.6PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.7PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.8PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.9PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.10PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.3.11PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.4.1RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.4.2RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.4.3PACh. 1 - Prob. 1.4.4PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- (a) Briefly discuss the Galbraith hypothesis in microeconomics.arrow_forwardSuppose you and your friend go out for dinner. Your friend orders a cheeseburger and fries. When your food first arrives, you ask your friend if you can have one of his fries. He looks at you like you are crazy and says, "No!" Then a few minutes later, after you both have started eating, you ask again, and your friend reluctantly says, "Sure. Go ahead." An economist's explanation for your friend's change of heart is most likely to be that: Your friend's total utility declines as he eats more fries, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few. Your friend's marginal utility from eating additional fries declines as he eats more of them, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few. Your friend's total utility increases as he eats more fries, so he's more likely to share with you after he's eaten a few. Your friend's marginal utility from eating additional fries increases as he eats more of them, so he's more likely to share with you…arrow_forwardIn terms of economics, what is the significance of the following quote? “On the next exam, I made the number of points available 137, instead of 100. This exam turned out to be harder than the first, with students getting only 70% of the answers right, but the average turned out to be a cheery 96 points.”arrow_forward
- can you give me a brief explanation on why this passage is an economic motivator?arrow_forward"Vernon Smith started a series of experiments to see whether basic predictions of the standard economic model about markets would prove correct. [...] Basically, the predictions proved good. A stunning result! Maybe, therefore, it doesn't matter if people are not like homo oeconomicus; the standard economic model can still work." (quote shortened, source: Edward Cartwright in his textbook "Behavioral Economics" (3rd edition, p. 8)). What kind of criticism of the standard economics model does Cartwright refer to? Explain why Vernon's findings can be used to support and uphold the standard model of microeconomics despite unrealistic assumptions?arrow_forwardSuppose you observe a person's answer to two decision problems. Problem 1: You are offered $40 today. What is the minimum amount x you demand one month from today in order to be willing to give up the $40 now? Answer: x = 52. Problem 2: Your are offered $40 today. What is the minimum amount x you demand one year from today in order to be willing to give up the $40 now? Answer: $60. 1. Demonstrate that the rational model of time preferences is violated for this choice pattern. 2. Derive this individual's B and d for the hyperbolic time discounting model. 3. Suppose the utility you get from eating ice cream now is 10 utils. But you pay a cost of -4 utils per hour for the next 4 hours, because it gives you indigestion and makes you feel lethargic. If your hourly B and d for this problem are B = .6 and d = .9, ... 1. What is the total discounted utility of eating ice cream now? 2. What is your total discounted utility now of planning to eat ice cream after lunch tomorrow? 3. Do you eat ice…arrow_forward
- What is the difference between static and dynamic analysis in economics? When is each appropriate?arrow_forwardQ.4 Microeconomics How incentives affect people’s behavior. The question: Does the seat belt law make people safer? You might talk about the role of incentives. The word "safer" meaning more safe is correct. In the most general terms, an incentive is anything that motivates a person to do something. When we're talking about economics, the definition becomes a bit narrower: Economic incentives are financial motivations for people to take certain actions. However, the discussion is focused on seat belt law and what are incentives surrounding it.arrow_forwardWhy is this answer different to the other answers for the same question?arrow_forward
- Could you please give me full detailed answer?arrow_forwardWhat is an Economistarrow_forwardThe narrator in the Planet Money Video poses this question: Is our shirt providing opportunities for people like Jasmine, or is it taking advantage of a desperate population? How do you think a Dependency Theorist would answer this question? Explain why.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506756
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning