a.
To explain: Why observational studies suggest that vitamin E therapy reduces that the risk of heart disease by describing the lurking variables.
a.
Explanation of Solution
Answers may vary. One of the possible lurking variables can be as follows:
An observational study conducted, suggested that vitamin E reduces that the risk of heart disease and also experiments showed that vitamin E has no effect in reducing the risk.
It is mentioned that, an observational study concluded that ‘vitamin E reduces that the risk of heart disease’ this conclusion might be reached because of the effect of the lurking variables in the study.
One of the lurking variables that affect the results is that, individuals in the study who are health conscious, this indicates that these individuals might take vitamin E for some other reasons. Also, the researchers who conducted the study might only include the people who are more health conscious. Thus, the study would be bias towards the people who are health conscious. Another lurking variable can be that individuals who are wealthy can buy vitamins for their health.
Thus, the lurking variables that affected the results of the study are individuals who are health conscious and wealthy.
b.
To explain: How the people who take vitamin E supplements have better health in observational studies but not in experiments.
b.
Explanation of Solution
In randomized experiment all the individuals in the study are assigned randomly to the treatments. In this study some of the individuals are randomly administered to vitamin E (treatment) and some the individuals are randomly not administered to vitamin E. Because of the randomly assigned the treatments, the results obtained in the experimental study would be more appropriate than observational study.
Moreover in observational study only the individuals are just observed and conclusion is drawn and also has some affects of lurking variables, All these reasons might lead to the people who take vitamin E supplements have better health in observational studies but not in experiments.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 0 Solutions
EBK THE BASIC PRACTICE OF STATISTICS
- T1.4: Let ẞ(G) be the minimum size of a vertex cover, a(G) be the maximum size of an independent set and m(G) = |E(G)|. (i) Prove that if G is triangle free (no induced K3) then m(G) ≤ a(G)B(G). Hints - The neighborhood of a vertex in a triangle free graph must be independent; all edges have at least one end in a vertex cover. (ii) Show that all graphs of order n ≥ 3 and size m> [n2/4] contain a triangle. Hints - you may need to use either elementary calculus or the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.arrow_forwardWe consider the one-period model studied in class as an example. Namely, we assumethat the current stock price is S0 = 10. At time T, the stock has either moved up toSt = 12 (with probability p = 0.6) or down towards St = 8 (with probability 1−p = 0.4).We consider a call option on this stock with maturity T and strike price K = 10. Theinterest rate on the money market is zero.As in class, we assume that you, as a customer, are willing to buy the call option on100 shares of stock for $120. The investor, who sold you the option, can adopt one of thefollowing strategies: Strategy 1: (seen in class) Buy 50 shares of stock and borrow $380. Strategy 2: Buy 55 shares of stock and borrow $430. Strategy 3: Buy 60 shares of stock and borrow $480. Strategy 4: Buy 40 shares of stock and borrow $280.(a) For each of strategies 2-4, describe the value of the investor’s portfolio at time 0,and at time T for each possible movement of the stock.(b) For each of strategies 2-4, does the investor have…arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Negate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardQuestion 6: Negate the following compound statements, using De Morgan's laws. A) If Alberta was under water entirely then there should be no fossil of mammals.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Characterize (with proof) all connected graphs that contain no even cycles in terms oftheir blocks.arrow_forwardLet G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C3 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C3 free). Prove that G is a complete bipartite grapharrow_forwardProve sufficiency of the condition for a graph to be bipartite that is, prove that if G hasno odd cycles then G is bipartite as follows:Assume that the statement is false and that G is an edge minimal counterexample. That is, Gsatisfies the conditions and is not bipartite but G − e is bipartite for any edge e. (Note thatthis is essentially induction, just using different terminology.) What does minimality say aboutconnectivity of G? Can G − e be disconnected? Explain why if there is an edge between twovertices in the same part of a bipartition of G − e then there is an odd cyclearrow_forward
MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSON
The Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman