Zulu reported $60,000 of income for the year by using absorption costing. The company had no beginning inventory, planned and actual production of 20,000 units, and sales of 19,000 units. Standard variable manufacturing costs were $22 per unit, and total budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead was $150,000. If there were no variances, what would be the income under variable costing?

Zulu reported $60,000 of income for the year by using absorption costing. The company had no beginning inventory, planned and actual production of 20,000 units, and sales of 19,000 units. Standard variable manufacturing costs were $22 per unit, and total budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead was $150,000. If there were no variances, what would be the income under variable costing?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Gary needs to show his supervisor how COGS, as reported on the company's income statement, might differ depending on the costing system used. Regardless of which inventory costing system the company uses, standard costs are incorporated into the analysis. The variable manufacturing and variable operating costs were $18 per unit and $3 per unit, respectively. Budgeted and actual fixed-MOH cost was $18,000, while fixed operating costs were $12,200. The company budgeted for 1.800 units but produced and sold 1,900 units this year. Any fixed-MOH volume variance is to be written off directly to COGS. Gary knew there were no variable cost variances. Show the COGS that would be presented on the company's income statement under (a) variable costing and (b) absorption costing. Variable Costing COGS $ $ Absorption Costing
Feagin Company’s actual variable overhead was $73,000. Actual direct labor hours were 25,000 to make 20,000 finished products. The per-unit standard for direct labor hour is 1.5 hours, and the pre-determined variable overhead rate is $3 per direct labor hour. What were (1) the variable overhead spending variance (2) the variable overhead efficiency variance?
Please help me. Thankyou.
Stuart Company established a predetermined fixed overhead cost rate of $35 per unit of product. The company planned to make 6,500 units of product but actually produced only 6,000 units. Actual fixed overhead costs were $235,600. Required a. Determine the fixed cost spending variance and indicate whether it is favorable (F) or unfavorable (U). b. Determine the fixed cost volume variance and indicate whether it is favorable (F) or unfavorable (U). Note: For all requirements, Select "None" if there is no effect (i.e., zero variance). a. Total spending variance b. Total volume variance U U
Please answer complete question, otherwise skip it,,,answer in text form please (without image)
Wildhorse Corporation budgeted $132,000 for its fixed-MOH cost going into the current year. Its actual fixed-MOH cost came in on budget, but it produced and sold 2,500 units instead of the budgeted 3,300. Wildhorse's actual variable manufacturing costs came in on budget at $51 per unit. What is Wildhorse's fixed-MOH volume variance for this year, recognizing that it uses standard costs within is absorption costing system? What is the company's initial COGS (before any variance is considered) and also its adjusted COGS after writing off that variance directly to COGS? Fixed-MOH volume variance $ Unadjusted COGS $ Adjusted COGS $ Unfavorable
Hughes Satellites' actual direct labor cost was $67,000 during the current period. Hughes reported an unfavorable direct labor rate variance of $1,800 and a favorable direct labor efficiency variance of $2,900. What was the standard direct labor cost for actual output during the period? IMPORTANT: Provide your answer in the following format: xxxxx (Do NOT use the dollar sign or commas in your final answer) Answer:
Fixed manufacturing costs are $40 per unit, and variable manufacturing costs are $120 per unit. Production was 113,000 units, while sales were 108,480 units. a. Determine whether variable costing operating income is less than or greater than absorption costing operating income. b. Determine the difference in variable costing and absorption costing operating income.
Assume that the cost formula for one of a company’s mixed expenses is $10,000 + $4.00 per unit. The company’s planned level of activity was 2,000 units and its actual level of activity was 2,200 units. The actual amount of this expense was $18,110. The spending variance for this expense is:
Assume the following: • The standard price per pound is $2.35. • The standard quantity of pounds allowed per unit of finished goods is 4 pounds. • The actual quantity of materials purchased was 53,000 pounds, whereas the quantity of materials used in production was 50,700 pounds. • The actual purchase price per pound of materials was $2.25. • The company produced 13,000 units of finished goods during the period. What is the materials quantity variance? Multiple Choice O о O $3,055 F $5,175 F $2,925 F $5,405 F
Please help me
Bridgeport sells its product for $82 per unit. During 2025, it produced 120400 units and sold 105100 units. Costs per unit are: direct materials $25, direct labor $9, variable overhead $4, and variable operating expenses $2. Fixed costs are $722400 manufacturing overhead, and $77500 operating expenses. Assuming no variances were reported, no beginning inventory exists, and the company uses absorption costing, what will be reported as operating income? O $3211200. ○ $3706100. O $3421400. O $3601000. i