Your new tax return client, Ms. X, had her 2018 tax return audited last year and found the whole experience so painful that she never wants to take a chance on ever having to deal with the IRS again. (She should have hired you to help de-fend the audit, but didn’t.) Specifically, she lost a very big part of her research tax credit because the IRS reclassified a large category of expenses that she had in-cluded in calculating the credit as “not sufficiently research-related.” As to her 2019 return, you note that Ms. X has even more expenses in that same category, meaning that her tax credit would be much larger if they were included in the calculation. And, more importantly, you’re aware that a Tax Court decision from earlier this year held, in another taxpayer’s almost identical circumstances, that the very same category of expenses was properly included in the research credit calculation. Can you, or should you, advise Ms. X that her own expenses in this same category can be used to her benefit in calculating her 2019 research credit even though they were specifically rejected on audit of her 2018 return? Discuss, but only after studying SSTS No. 5. Note: You don’t actually need to understand the research credit for purposes of this question – just take the recited “facts” at face value
Your new tax return client, Ms. X, had her 2018 tax return audited last year and found the whole experience so painful that she never wants to take a chance on ever having to deal with the IRS again. (She should have hired you to help de-fend the audit, but didn’t.) Specifically, she lost a very big part of her research tax credit because the IRS reclassified a large category of expenses that she had in-cluded in calculating the credit as “not sufficiently research-related.”
As to her 2019 return, you note that Ms. X has even more expenses in that same category, meaning that her tax credit would be much larger if they were included in the calculation. And, more importantly, you’re aware that a Tax Court decision from earlier this year held, in another taxpayer’s almost identical circumstances, that the very same category of expenses was properly included in the research credit calculation. Can you, or should you, advise Ms. X that her own expenses in this same category can be used to her benefit in calculating her 2019 research credit even though they were specifically rejected on audit of her 2018 return?
Discuss, but only after studying SSTS No. 5.
Note: You don’t actually need to understand the research credit for purposes of this question – just take the recited “facts” at face value
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
![FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259964947/9781259964947_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Accounting](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337272094/9781337272094_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Accounting Information Systems](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337619202/9781337619202_smallCoverImage.gif)
![FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259964947/9781259964947_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Accounting](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337272094/9781337272094_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Accounting Information Systems](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337619202/9781337619202_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134475585/9780134475585_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Intermediate Accounting](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259722660/9781259722660_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Financial and Managerial Accounting](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259726705/9781259726705_smallCoverImage.gif)