You may recall that in recent National Football League history, Tom Brady and the New England Patriots were accused of deliberately deflating footballs in order to give themselves a competitive advantage on the football playing field. Presumably, one advantage of playing with a deflated football is that the ball is easier to grip..not only for the quarterback but for everyone who touches it. If the ball is easier to grip, players would fumble it less often. So, one way to examine if the Patriots actually had a competitive advantage due to deflated footballs is to compare their rate of fumbles with the rates of other NFL teams. It is important to note that prior to 2007, teams were not permitted to prepare their own footballs before a game-so it was only after that time that such an advantage should be observed -if there actually was such an advantage. Below, are the actual fumble rates for the 23 NFL teams who, like the Patriots, play in a NON-domed stadium where weather conditions that affect fumbles can vary over the course of a season. Each score represents a fumble rate for the team that is averaged over the 7 seasons BEFORE teams were allowed to prepare their own footballs (2000-2006). The number represents the rate of fumbles as a function of the total number of "touches" that an offense had on the ball. So a score of say, “35" would mean that on the average of those 7 seasons, a team fumbled one time for every 35 touches on the ball. A “touch" is defined as a unique player coming into contact with the ball during a play. On a conventional hand-off or pass to one receiver, there are two touches because two players touched the ball. Here are the fumble rates for 2000-2006(Note: these are real fumble numbers. These data are not invented for this assignment. 36,36,36,36,38,38,38,38,40,40,42,42,42,42,44,44,44,46,46,46,46,48,56. During this time period, the New England Patriots fumbled the ball one time for every 42 touches. Conduct a z-test that tests whether it is reasonable to think that the Patriots had no particular competitive advantage on fumbling during the time period 2000-2006.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
You may recall that in recent National Football League history, Tom Brady and the New England Patriots
were accused of deliberately deflating footballs in order to give themselves a competitive advantage on
the football playing field. Presumably, one advantage of playing with a deflated football is that the ball
is easier to grip...not only for the quarterback but for everyone who touches it. If the ball is easier to
grip, players would fumble it less often. So, one way to examine if the Patriots actually had a
competitive advantage due to deflated footballs is to compare their rate of fumbles with the rates of
other NFL teams. It is important to note that prior to 2007, teams were not permitted to prepare their
own footballs before a game-so it was only after that time that such an advantage should be observed
-if there actually was such an advantage. Below, are the actual fumble rates for the 23 NFL teams who,
like the Patriots, play in a NON-domed stadium where weather conditions that affect fumbles can vary
over the course of a season. Each score represents a fumble rate for the team that is averaged over the
7 seasons BEFORE teams were allowed to prepare their own footballs (2000-2006). The number
represents the rate of fumbles as a function of the total number of "touches" that an offense had on the
ball. So a score of say, "35" would mean that on the average of those 7 seasons, a team fumbled one
time for every 35 touches on the ball. A "touch" is defined as a unique player coming into contact with
the ball during a play. On a conventional hand-off or pass to one receiver, there are two touches
because two players touched the ball. Here are the fumble rates for 2000-2006(Note: these are real
fumble numbers. These data are not invented for this assignment.
36,36,36,36,38,38,38,38,40,40,42,42,42,42,44,44,44,46,46,46,46,48,56.
During this time period, the New England Patriots fumbled the ball one time for every 42 touches.
Conduct a z-test that tests whether it is reasonable to think that the Patriots had no particular
competitive advantage on fumbling during the time period 2000-2006.
Transcribed Image Text:You may recall that in recent National Football League history, Tom Brady and the New England Patriots were accused of deliberately deflating footballs in order to give themselves a competitive advantage on the football playing field. Presumably, one advantage of playing with a deflated football is that the ball is easier to grip...not only for the quarterback but for everyone who touches it. If the ball is easier to grip, players would fumble it less often. So, one way to examine if the Patriots actually had a competitive advantage due to deflated footballs is to compare their rate of fumbles with the rates of other NFL teams. It is important to note that prior to 2007, teams were not permitted to prepare their own footballs before a game-so it was only after that time that such an advantage should be observed -if there actually was such an advantage. Below, are the actual fumble rates for the 23 NFL teams who, like the Patriots, play in a NON-domed stadium where weather conditions that affect fumbles can vary over the course of a season. Each score represents a fumble rate for the team that is averaged over the 7 seasons BEFORE teams were allowed to prepare their own footballs (2000-2006). The number represents the rate of fumbles as a function of the total number of "touches" that an offense had on the ball. So a score of say, "35" would mean that on the average of those 7 seasons, a team fumbled one time for every 35 touches on the ball. A "touch" is defined as a unique player coming into contact with the ball during a play. On a conventional hand-off or pass to one receiver, there are two touches because two players touched the ball. Here are the fumble rates for 2000-2006(Note: these are real fumble numbers. These data are not invented for this assignment. 36,36,36,36,38,38,38,38,40,40,42,42,42,42,44,44,44,46,46,46,46,48,56. During this time period, the New England Patriots fumbled the ball one time for every 42 touches. Conduct a z-test that tests whether it is reasonable to think that the Patriots had no particular competitive advantage on fumbling during the time period 2000-2006.
a. State the NULL hypothesis
b. State the ALTERNATIVE hypothesis
c. Compute the value of the test statistic (z).
d. Specify the critical value of "z" needed to reject the null hypothesis
e. Decide whether you accept or reject the null hypothesis
f. State your conclusion about whether it is reasonable to think that the Patriots had a competitive
advantage during this time period. Be clear about the statistical basis/reason for your conclusion.
Transcribed Image Text:a. State the NULL hypothesis b. State the ALTERNATIVE hypothesis c. Compute the value of the test statistic (z). d. Specify the critical value of "z" needed to reject the null hypothesis e. Decide whether you accept or reject the null hypothesis f. State your conclusion about whether it is reasonable to think that the Patriots had a competitive advantage during this time period. Be clear about the statistical basis/reason for your conclusion.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 7 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Research Ethics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman