You hired a mathematician (who never took a Natural Resource Economics class) to solve a 4 period nonrenewable resource problem assuming a competitive industry and a total resource constraint of 100. He returns an answer to you where per period output levels are increasing and he gets a lambda value: 1 = -3.45. From this you conclude: Demand is too low for the constraint of 100 to be binding. Therefore there is no scarcity. The mathematician must have made a mathematical mistake. Competitive firms place no weight on the future and therefore behave like there is no opportunity cost of extracting a resource today. Demand is too high to support the extraction of the resource so the marginal user cost become negative.
You hired a mathematician (who never took a Natural Resource Economics class) to solve a 4 period nonrenewable resource problem assuming a competitive industry and a total resource constraint of 100. He returns an answer to you where per period output levels are increasing and he gets a lambda value: 1 = -3.45. From this you conclude: Demand is too low for the constraint of 100 to be binding. Therefore there is no scarcity. The mathematician must have made a mathematical mistake. Competitive firms place no weight on the future and therefore behave like there is no opportunity cost of extracting a resource today. Demand is too high to support the extraction of the resource so the marginal user cost become negative.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:You hired a mathematician (who never took a Natural Resource Economics class) to solve
a 4 period nonrenewable resource problem assuming a competitive industry and a total
resource constraint of 100. He returns an answer to you where per period output levels
are increasing and he gets a lambda value: 1 = -3.45. From this you conclude:
Demand is too low for the constraint of 100 to be binding. Therefore there is no scarcity.
The mathematician must have made a mathematical mistake.
Competitive firms place no weight on the future and therefore behave like there is no
opportunity cost of extracting a resource today.
Demand is too high to support the extraction of the resource so the marginal user cost become
negative.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Recommended textbooks for you


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education