You are investigating whether a new treatment for depression works better than two established treatments. You randomly assign 90 participants to one of three groups (New Treatment, Established Treatment 1. and Established Treatment 2). Because these are all new types of treatment for depression you dont have any previous research or theory on which to suggest that one treatment will be better or worse than another. Ater the experiment is completed you explore the mean group differences you found. In se doing you would be conducting O Tukey's post hoc tests Oa correlated groups t-test O effect sizes an a priori (planned) compartson

You are investigating whether a new treatment for depression works better than two established treatments. You randomly assign 90 participants to one of three groups (New Treatment, Established Treatment 1. and Established Treatment 2). Because these are all new types of treatment for depression you dont have any previous research or theory on which to suggest that one treatment will be better or worse than another. Ater the experiment is completed you explore the mean group differences you found. In se doing you would be conducting O Tukey's post hoc tests Oa correlated groups t-test O effect sizes an a priori (planned) compartson

Name: You are investigating whether a new treatment for depression works be
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: You are investigating whether a new treatment for depression works better than two established treatments. You randomly assign 90 participants to one ofthree groups (New Treatment. Established Treatment 1, and Established Treatment 2). Because these

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 380 of the 581 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 318 of the 503 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer v Select an answer Select an answer v (please enter a decimal) Hj: Select an answer Select an answer vSelect an answer v (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? v (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? a f. Based on this, we should Select an answer g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... |the null hypothesis. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to…
Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 348 of the 574 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 272 of the 518 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (please enter a decimal) H₁: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer (Please enter a decimal) = c. The test statistic ? ◊ your answer to 3 decimal places.) (please show
You are a medical researcher that wants to determine if your new drug can lower people's blood pressure. You recruit 60 participants with high blood pressure to be part of your study. You randomly assign participants to one of three groups to receive either 10 mg of your drug, 5 mg, or 0 mg (given as a placebo control). After 2 weeks, participants' blood pressure is measured and you compare among the 3 groups. Which statistical test would be best to determine if there is a significant difference in blood pressure among the three groups?
A researcher was interested in how the effects of stress were different in people with our without military training. A equal number of participants were recruited that either had no military experience or had completed military experience. All participants were asked to give a speech without preparation while being judged by a panel of experts. Their heart rates were monitored during the speech and an average heart rate was calcuated for each participant. Which statistical test would be best to determine if there is a significant difference between groups? one-sample t-test dependent samples t-test independent samples t-test ANOVA
A source table has the following information: Three treatment conditions with a sample of n =7 participants in each treatment. You know SS(BW) = 20 and MS(WI) = 2. What is the missing value for MS(BW)? Answer choices: 40, 10, 2, 5 You have an ANOVA source table with the following information: Three treatment groups with a sample of n = 10 participants in each treatment. You also know the SS(BW) =20 and F = 5.00. What is the missing value for SS(Total)? Answer choices: 74, 54, 30, 22 For an experiment involving 2 levels of factor A and 3 levels of factor B with a sample of n = 5 in each treatment condition, what is the value for df(WI)? Answer choices: 30, 29, 24, 20
Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 356 of the 579 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 322 of the 597 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Hn: Select an answer v Select an answer v Select an answer v (please enter a decimal) Hj: Select an answer v Select an answer v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? v= (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? v a f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient…
Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 429 of the 567 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 396 of the 544 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer Select an answer v Select an answer | (please enter a decimal) Hj: Select an answer v Select an answer v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = e. The p-value is ? v a f. Based on this, we should Select an answer g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) the null hypothesis. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is statistically…
Q3, just parts d, e, f. (posted a, b, c as a different question)
A health officer thinks that there is an association between diabetes (DM) and hypertension (HPT). He believes that those with DM are more likely to have HPT as well. For his research, from the hospital records, he selected a random sample of 400 patients, 300 with DM and 100 without DM. Out of the 300 DM patients, 60 had HPT as well and out of the 100 non DM patients 10 had HPT. He also recorded the patients’ gender. With the data, he performed two analyses, one for all policyholders and the other by gender. The following are some of the output from SPSS. Must the manager consider gender as well in this case? If yes, stating the evidence, explain why. If you are the health officer, how would the results above help you in making decision? What other variables, if any, should be considered as well?