You are hired by the governor to study whether a tax on liquor has decreased average liquor consump- tion in your state. You are able to obtain, for a sample of individuals selected at random, the difference in liquor consumption (in ounces) for the years before and after the tax. For person i who is sampled randomly from the population, Y, denotes the change in liquor consumption. Treat these as a random sample from a Normal(µ, o²) distribution. (i) The null hypothesis is that there was no change in average liquor consumption. State this formally in terms of µ. (ii) The alternative is that there was a decline in liquor consumption; state the alternative in terms of µ. (iii) Now, suppose your sample size is n = 900 and you obtain the estimates ỹ = -32.8 and s = 466.4. Calculate the t statistic for testing Ho against H¡; obtain the p-value for the test. (Because of the large sample size, just use the standard normal distribution tabulated in Table G.1.) Do you reject H, at the 5% level? At the 1% level? (iv) Would you say that the estimated fall in consumption is large in magnitude? Comment on the practical versus statistical significance of this estimate. (v) What has been implicitly assumed in your analysis about other determinants of liquor consumption over the two-year period in order to infer causality from the tax change to liquor consumption?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
You are hired by the governor to study whether a tax on liquor has decreased average liquor consump-
tion in your state. You are able to obtain, for a sample of individuals selected at random, the difference
in liquor consumption (in ounces) for the years before and after the tax. For person i who is sampled
randomly from the population, Y, denotes the change in liquor consumption. Treat these as a random
sample from a Normal(µ, o²) distribution.
(i) The null hypothesis is that there was no change in average liquor consumption. State this
formally in terms of µ.
(ii) The alternative is that there was a decline in liquor consumption; state the alternative in terms of µ.
(iii) Now, suppose your sample size is n = 900 and you obtain the estimates ỹ = -32.8 and
s = 466.4. Calculate the t statistic for testing Ho against H¡; obtain the p-value for the test.
(Because of the large sample size, just use the standard normal distribution tabulated in
Table G.1.) Do you reject H, at the 5% level? At the 1% level?
(iv) Would you say that the estimated fall in consumption is large in magnitude? Comment on the
practical versus statistical significance of this estimate.
(v) What has been implicitly assumed in your analysis about other determinants of liquor consumption
over the two-year period in order to infer causality from the tax change to liquor consumption?
Transcribed Image Text:You are hired by the governor to study whether a tax on liquor has decreased average liquor consump- tion in your state. You are able to obtain, for a sample of individuals selected at random, the difference in liquor consumption (in ounces) for the years before and after the tax. For person i who is sampled randomly from the population, Y, denotes the change in liquor consumption. Treat these as a random sample from a Normal(µ, o²) distribution. (i) The null hypothesis is that there was no change in average liquor consumption. State this formally in terms of µ. (ii) The alternative is that there was a decline in liquor consumption; state the alternative in terms of µ. (iii) Now, suppose your sample size is n = 900 and you obtain the estimates ỹ = -32.8 and s = 466.4. Calculate the t statistic for testing Ho against H¡; obtain the p-value for the test. (Because of the large sample size, just use the standard normal distribution tabulated in Table G.1.) Do you reject H, at the 5% level? At the 1% level? (iv) Would you say that the estimated fall in consumption is large in magnitude? Comment on the practical versus statistical significance of this estimate. (v) What has been implicitly assumed in your analysis about other determinants of liquor consumption over the two-year period in order to infer causality from the tax change to liquor consumption?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman