**Question: Implementing Redundant Network Topology**You are given a task to implement infrastructure that will accommodate failed connections. Which of the following network topologies provides redundancy for a failed link?- Ring topology- Bus Topology- Star topology- Mesh topology**Explanation:**The question is asking which network topology is best suited to handle and provide redundancy in the event of a link failure. Here’s a brief overview of each topology:1. **Ring Topology:** - In a ring topology, each node is connected to exactly two other nodes, forming a single continuous pathway for signals through each node. - This topology can handle single link failures if it’s a dual ring topology; however, a single ring topology without redundancy will be affected by any link failure as it will break the loop.2. **Bus Topology:** - In a bus topology, all nodes are connected to a single central cable (the bus). - A failure in the central cable (bus) will bring down the entire network segments.3. **Star Topology:** - In a star topology, each node connects to a central hub. - The central hub becomes a single point of failure; if the hub fails, all nodes connected to that hub cannot communicate.4. **Mesh Topology:** - In a mesh topology, each node is connected to multiple other nodes. - This provides high redundancy, as there are multiple paths for data to travel in case a link fails. This is the most resilient topology concerning redundancy.**Conclusion:**The correct answer among the given options for providing redundancy for a failed link is the **Mesh topology**. It is designed to handle multiple failures due to its multiple paths for data transfer, thereby ensuring continuous network connectivity and robustness.

In step 2, I have provided ANSWER with brief explanation------------

Answered: You are give a task to implement…

You are give a task to implement infrastructure that will accommodate failed connections. Which of the following network topologies provides redundancy for a filed link?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Make a map → from source to destination there are many routes that can be taken within the map. Connect the 5 routers → name it A (has 3 connections), B (has 2 connections), C (has 2 connections), D (has 2 connections), and E (has 1 connection). IP addressing: LAN A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 C1 C2 D1 D2 E1 Network Address 192.168.1.0 192.168.2.0 192.168.3.0 192.168.10.0 192.168.11.0 192.168.20.0 192.168.21.0 192.168.32.0 192.168.33.0 192.168.40.0 Subnet Mask /24
Complete this sentence: Spanning tree protocol… a. … reduces a partial mesh switched network in a loop free hierarchical one b. … is used by routers to route traffic between different VLANs c. … inserts a TTL counter into the frame headers d. … reduces a partial mesh to a tree by temporarily shutting down unnecessary devices
With an example, what is the difference between a distance vector, a link state vector, and a path vector routing?
Distance vector regularly sends its routing table to all active interfaces. Link status informs all internetwork routers about its connections. Link status and Distance vector may be utilized in many contexts.
Please do not write on paper, thank you so so much!
Distance vector routeing vs. Link State routeing: what's the difference?
Consider the following virtual circuit network with three reserved virtual circuits: уC1: H1, А, С, Е, Н2 VC2: H3, A, F, D, H4 ус3: НЗ, А, F, D, E, H2 Host H4 Host H3 Нost H2 Host H1 Draw the routing table of router D and the routing table of router C. *you may design a table using the HTML editor or write the content of routing table record by record (record per line).
- Consider another carelessly written Web application, which uses a servlet that checks if there was an active session, but does not check if the user is authorized to access that page, instead depending on the fact that a link to the page is shown only to authorized users. What is the risk with this scheme? (There was a real instance where applicants to a college admissions site could, after logging into the Web site, exploit this loophole and view information they were not authorized to see; the unauthorized access was however detected, and those who accessed the information were punished by being denied admission.)
Using a static route would be suitable in what sorts of situations, and when?
Question 23 A client's browser sends an HTTP request to a website. The website responds with a handshake and sets up a TCP connection. The connection setup takes 2.1 ms, including the RTT. The browser then sends the request for the website's index file. The index file references 8 additional images, which are to be requested/downloaded by the client's browser. Assuming all other conditions are equal, how much longer would non-persistent HTTP take than persistent HTTP? (Give answer in milliseconds, without units, rounded to one decimal place. For an answer of 0.01005 seconds, you would enter "10.1" without the quotes.)
How does the collision domain become reduced by using a bridge vs a router, and how do they differ?
- Consider another carelessly written Web application, which uses a servlet that checks if there was an active session, but does not check if the user is authorized to access that page, instead depending on the fact that a link to the page is shown only to authorized users. What is the risk with this scheme? (There was a real instance where applicants to a college admissions site could, after logging into the Web site, exploit this loophole and view information they were not authorized to see; the unauthorized access was however detected, and those who accessed the information were punished by being denied admission.)