Write your answer on your own sheet of paper and either scan it or take a picture of it and upload it or type your answers into a word document As we've learned, the weights of the players can be deceiving when it comes to determining the amount of power each individual player has. By manipulating the quota, one can make the balance of power be whatever one wants. We’re going to work with this weighted voting system: [q: 5, 4, 3] Determine what to use for the quota to get the indicated BPI values. In each case, explain how you determined your answer by either writing a sentence or two to explain your thought process, or show the work to find the BPIs to prove that your quota actually works. 1) BPI(P1) = 33.33%   BPI(P2) = 33.33%    BPI(P3) = 33.33% [All players have equal power] 2) BPI(P1) = 60% BPI(P2) = 20% BPI(P3) = 20% 3) BPI(P1) = 50% BPI(P2) = 50% BPI(P3) = 0% [P3 is a dummy]

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question

Write your answer on your own sheet of paper and either scan it or take a picture of it and upload it or type your answers into a word document

As we've learned, the weights of the players can be deceiving when it comes to determining the amount of power each individual player has.

By manipulating the quota, one can make the balance of power be whatever one wants.

We’re going to work with this weighted voting system: [q: 5, 4, 3]

Determine what to use for the quota to get the indicated BPI values.

In each case, explain how you determined your answer by either writing a sentence or two to explain your thought process, or show the work to find the BPIs to prove that your quota actually works.

1) BPI(P1) = 33.33%   BPI(P2) = 33.33%    BPI(P3) = 33.33% [All players have equal power]

2) BPI(P1) = 60% BPI(P2) = 20% BPI(P3) = 20%

3) BPI(P1) = 50% BPI(P2) = 50% BPI(P3) = 0% [P3 is a dummy]

 

 

# Chapter Two Project

**Due:** Oct 3 by 11:59pm  
**Points:** 10  
**Submitting:** a file upload  
**File Types:** doc, docx, pdf, jpg, and png  
**Available:** until Dec 16 at 11:59pm  

**Instructions:**

Here’s a [video explaining the instructions for this project](#).

1. **Submission Guidelines:**
   - Write your answer on your own sheet of paper and either scan it or take a picture of it to upload. Alternatively, type your answers into a Word document.

2. **Understanding the Project:**
   - The project's focus is on weighted voting systems, where the weights of the players can be deceiving in terms of determining the actual power each player holds.
   - By manipulating the quota, the balance of power can be adjusted as desired.

3. **Voting System Details:**
   - We will use the following weighted voting system: **[q: 5, 4, 3]**.

4. **Objective:**
   - Determine the appropriate quota to achieve the specified BPI (Banzhaf Power Index) values.

5. **Tasks:**
   - **1)** BPI(P1) = 33.33%  BPI(P2) = 33.33%  BPI(P3) = 33.33% [All players have equal power]
   - **2)** BPI(P1) = 60%  BPI(P2) = 20%  BPI(P3) = 20%
   - **3)** BPI(P1) = 50%  BPI(P2) = 50%  BPI(P3) = 0% [P3 is a dummy]

6. **Explaining Your Solution:**
   - In each scenario, describe how you determined your answer. You can write a sentence or two to explain your thought process or provide the calculations to demonstrate how your proposed quota achieves these BPI values.

Remember to ensure clarity and precision in your submissions, adhering to the guidelines presented above. Good luck!
Transcribed Image Text:# Chapter Two Project **Due:** Oct 3 by 11:59pm **Points:** 10 **Submitting:** a file upload **File Types:** doc, docx, pdf, jpg, and png **Available:** until Dec 16 at 11:59pm **Instructions:** Here’s a [video explaining the instructions for this project](#). 1. **Submission Guidelines:** - Write your answer on your own sheet of paper and either scan it or take a picture of it to upload. Alternatively, type your answers into a Word document. 2. **Understanding the Project:** - The project's focus is on weighted voting systems, where the weights of the players can be deceiving in terms of determining the actual power each player holds. - By manipulating the quota, the balance of power can be adjusted as desired. 3. **Voting System Details:** - We will use the following weighted voting system: **[q: 5, 4, 3]**. 4. **Objective:** - Determine the appropriate quota to achieve the specified BPI (Banzhaf Power Index) values. 5. **Tasks:** - **1)** BPI(P1) = 33.33% BPI(P2) = 33.33% BPI(P3) = 33.33% [All players have equal power] - **2)** BPI(P1) = 60% BPI(P2) = 20% BPI(P3) = 20% - **3)** BPI(P1) = 50% BPI(P2) = 50% BPI(P3) = 0% [P3 is a dummy] 6. **Explaining Your Solution:** - In each scenario, describe how you determined your answer. You can write a sentence or two to explain your thought process or provide the calculations to demonstrate how your proposed quota achieves these BPI values. Remember to ensure clarity and precision in your submissions, adhering to the guidelines presented above. Good luck!
# Meaningful Voting Systems

There are some limitations on what the quota could be.

Here are some examples that show some problems with choosing just any number for the quota.

**[4: 3, 2, 1, 1, 1]**

This system has 5 players. It has a total weight of 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 8. Four votes are required to pass a motion.

Suppose that Player One (3 votes) and Player Three (1 vote) decide to vote in favor, but Player Two (2 votes), Player Four (1 vote), and Player Five (1 vote) all oppose the motion.

Then it is 4 votes in favor (3 + 1) and 4 votes against (2 + 1 + 1). Nothing is decided.

In order to avoid this problem of ties, we announce that the **quota must be at least a majority of the total weight.**

Here’s another example where things can go wrong.

**[7: 2, 2, 1]**

This system has 3 players. It has a total weight 2 + 2 + 1 = 5. Seven votes are required to pass a motion.

In this case, even if all three players vote “Yes,” they will only have 5 votes, and they will never pass any motions.

To avoid this problem, we announce that the **quota must be less than or equal to the total weight.**

Algebraically, this looks like this:

\[
\frac{w_1 + w_2 + w_3 + \ldots + w_n}{2} < q \leq w_1 + w_2 + w_3 + \ldots + w_n
\]

In a weighted voting system with N players:
Transcribed Image Text:# Meaningful Voting Systems There are some limitations on what the quota could be. Here are some examples that show some problems with choosing just any number for the quota. **[4: 3, 2, 1, 1, 1]** This system has 5 players. It has a total weight of 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 8. Four votes are required to pass a motion. Suppose that Player One (3 votes) and Player Three (1 vote) decide to vote in favor, but Player Two (2 votes), Player Four (1 vote), and Player Five (1 vote) all oppose the motion. Then it is 4 votes in favor (3 + 1) and 4 votes against (2 + 1 + 1). Nothing is decided. In order to avoid this problem of ties, we announce that the **quota must be at least a majority of the total weight.** Here’s another example where things can go wrong. **[7: 2, 2, 1]** This system has 3 players. It has a total weight 2 + 2 + 1 = 5. Seven votes are required to pass a motion. In this case, even if all three players vote “Yes,” they will only have 5 votes, and they will never pass any motions. To avoid this problem, we announce that the **quota must be less than or equal to the total weight.** Algebraically, this looks like this: \[ \frac{w_1 + w_2 + w_3 + \ldots + w_n}{2} < q \leq w_1 + w_2 + w_3 + \ldots + w_n \] In a weighted voting system with N players:
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,