Write a propositional formula y with variables p, q,r in the conjunctive normal form that has exactly the following three models (i.e. satisfying assignments) v1, V2, V3: Vị 1 1 1 V2 1 V3 1 1 Let v denote the formula ¬q → r. Which of the implications p → v, V → p is a tautology? Why (not)?

Write a propositional formula y with variables p, q,r in the conjunctive normal form that has exactly the following three models (i.e. satisfying assignments) v1, V2, V3: Vị 1 1 1 V2 1 V3 1 1 Let v denote the formula ¬q → r. Which of the implications p → v, V → p is a tautology? Why (not)?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Q: P is a predicate, f, g are functions, a is a constant, and x, y, we have ➡), f(y, x), × ), and f(a,…

A: Given that P is a predicate, f, g are functions, a is a constant, and x, y, u, v, w are variables,…

Q: 51. Establish these logical equivalences, where x does not oc- cur as a free variable in A. Assume…

A: These question answer is as follows

Q: Consider the truth function f(P, Q, R) = (P Q) - R a) Find a restricted statement form in…

A: According to the information given:- We have to find the appropriate restricted statement form in…

Q: Simplify the given proposition using Logical Equivalence rules and determine if it is a tautology,…

A: Logical Equivalence is a concept in propositional logic that deals with determining whether two…

Q: Exercise 3. Build the truth table of(pVq)++ ( - P, where p and q are two propositional formulae? Is…

A: Solution: Given,

Q: Show that ¬(p → q) → ¬q is a tautology using rules (not a truth table

A: The given expression is a tautology. I am proving by rules. Please find hand written submission in…

Q: b) Using two different methods determine whether the propositions (p → q) → q and p V q are…

A: We have to check whether given two propositions are logically equivalent or not. We can check by…

Q: Let p, q , r be well-formed formulas of propositional calculus. Determine if (p ∧ q) ( ( p -> q ) ∧…

A: Contingency

Q: a simple indirect relation (e.g., X is a friend of Y and Y is a friend of Z and Z is a friend of W,…

A: To suggest possible friends to a person based on indirect relations, we can use Prolog to define the…

Q: . Using the truth table Determine whether: a) (¬p → ¬q ) ∨ (p → ¬q) is equivalent to p ∨ ¬p b) ¬p…

A: As per Bartleby rules we can answer only 1 question at a time So am answering both parts of Question…

Q: EXERCISE 5.3 Verify whether (a → b) → b is a tautology. Is the following proof correct? If not, what…

A: A tautology is a formula that is always true, regardless of the truth values of its propositional…

Q: (а) -(Ал -А) (b) -А — (А > В) (с) AV -A

A: 1) ¬(A^¬A) =¬A V ¬(¬A) Using DeMorgan's law =¬A V A = T…

Q: a. Explain why if a compound proposition is unsatisfiable, then its negation is a tautology. b. Give…

Q: 29. p → (q \ r) = (p ^~q) → r

A: The question asks to use the biconditional (↔) operator to convert the logical equivalence P ->…

Q: Prove that r V (rp) is a tautology by applying the laws of propositional logic.

A: Answer: We need to prove the given expression if tautology. so we will see in the more details…

Q: For the open sentence P(x):3x-2>4 over the domain Z, determine: (1) the values of x for which P (x)…

A: GIVEN:

Q: (a) Vx (P(x)→ Q(x)) → (3x P(x)→→ 3x Q(x)) ((x)0 XA (x)d XA) ((x)0 (x)d) XE (9) (c) 3x (P(x) → Q(x))…

Q: 2. Using the method of full or partial truth tables, say whether the following sentences of L1 are…

A: Truth table value.

Q: (~B ->~A) -> ((~B -> A) ->B)

A: Tautology is an assertion which is true in all possible combination. Contradiction is an assertion…

Q: Let P(x) be the statement “x can speak Russian” and let Q(x) be the statement “x knows C++”. Express…

A: Predicate logic which gives us the power to express a wide variety of statements. It is one of the…

Q: Construct a truth table 0 = F and 1 = T then indicate when it is Tautology, Contradiction or neither…

A: Tautology is an assertion that is true for all possible combination. Contradiction is an assertion…

Q: This question is concerned with predicate logic in Lean Is the following proposition a tautology?…

A: This question is concerned with predicate logic in Lean Is the following proposition a tautology?(∀…

Q: the following formal theorems: (a) E (p = 4) = (¬9 v e6)

A: 4. Let co, E S(P). Give derivations (Using Equational Layout)) of the following formal theorems:…

Q: use propositional logic to see if the argument is valid (A ∧ B) ∧ (B → A’) → (C ∧ B’) A ∧ B…

A: Here in this question we have given a logical statement and we have asked to show that this is valid…

Q: predicate logic.

A: Given :- In the above question, the syllogisms , written in the symbolic of predicate logic is…

Q: Consider the following predicates. P(x) is the statement "x−40". Determine the truth value of the…

A: Proposition is a statement that is either true or false. A proposition can be expressed in terms of…

Q: Consider the following formula in predicate logic: ∃(P(y) Λ Q(y)) with domain the set of all human…

A: Dear Student, " ∃ " represents there exists. Also , P(y) Λ Q(y) means Y is an engineer and is…

Q: Consider the following premises: 1. A (B A) is a Theorem of Propositional Calculus/Logic…

A: the answer is given below:-

Q: Explain how to negate a universal and existential quantification. Give 2 examples of each.

A: In logic, negation also called the logical complement is an operation that takes a proposition P to…

Q: R such that P(x)" is true. Avoid very similar predicates like "x Z" or "2x Q" as your 2 answer.

A: This is just a brief idea about what is asked in the question. The answer for the question is…

Q: 5. A set of formulas Mo is an axiom system for a set of formulas M if {A A is a model for Mo} = {A |…

A: Answer is explained below in detail

Q: Consider the wffs: φ1 ≡ p1 → (p2 → (p3 → p4)) φ2 ≡ (p1 ∧ p2 ∧ p3) → p4 (a) Technically speaking,…

A: Answer: our guideline is answer first three question from the first question. so we will answer one…

Q: Q4. Let zand y be propositional variables. Which of the following propositions is not a tautology?…

A: In this question we have to find and select the propositional logic made using x and y variables…

Q: 1) Write the truth table for the proposition -(→¬q) v (pn¬1). 2.Determine whether p→ (g) and p→…

A: Note:- since your question contain multiple question but we can answer only first question or you…

Q: I need help to answer Question no. 30 prove that the below WFF is a valid argument. (∀x)(∀y)[(P(x)…

A: I explain this question in second steps.

Q: Show that each of these conditional statements is a tautology and are logically Equivalent by using…

A: Tautology:- Tautology is a logical statement that always gives true. It is an expression that is…

Q: Is the following propositional formula a tautology, contradiction, or neither? (P→g) V (PA-q) O…

A: C) Tautology

Concept explainers

Intelligent Machines

Machines that use artificial intelligence to learn from the environment and past experiences to perform better in the presence of variability and uncertainty are called intelligent machines. Intelligence develops according to environment and experience. It is human-like behavior. When the computer system or any programmed machine learns from the inputs and corresponding outputs, it can be called an intelligent machine.

Question

Write a propositional formula y with variables p, q,r in the conjunctive
normal form that has exactly the following three models (i.e. satisfying
assignments) v1, v2, V3:
V1
1
V2
1
1
V3
1
1
1
Let v denote the formula -q → r. Which of the implications y → v,
b → p is a tautology? Why (not)?

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1

VIEW

Step 2

VIEW

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

1: Prove the validity of the following sequents : a. (cAn) → t, hA-s, hA-(s V c) pE (n A¬t) → p b. (s – p) V (t → q) E (s → q) V (t → p) C. vx (P(x) → (Q(x) V R(x))), – 3x (P(x) A R(x)) Fvx (P(x) → Q(x))
3. Express the following English sentences using propositional functions, quantifiers and logical connections. (a) Someone in the class is helped by everyone in the class. (b) There is a hard working student in the class who has not been helped by any student in class. (c) For everyone in the class, someone who is smart has helped him/her. SO (d) There are two people in the class who have not helped each other. (e) There is a hard working student in the class who is helped by every smart student in class. (f) There are some companies that hire only hard working students.
Let P(x) and Q(x) be relations, with x a variable from a given domain of discourse U. The Axiom of the Hilbert deductive system for first-order logic applied below is "Axiom 1,2,3,4,5" ? ⊢ ∀x P(x) → (∃x Q(x) → ∀x P(x)) Consider the steps given below of a proof in the Hilbert deductive system and determine the reason that justifies each. ∀x A(x) ⊢ ∀x A(x) "?"∀x A(x) ⊢ ∀x A(x) → A(a) " ?"∀x A(x) ⊢ A(a) " ?"
Show that the following two formulas are NOT logically equivalent by giving a model in which one is true and the other is false: ∃x ( R(x) → S(x) ) and ¬ ∀x ( R(x) ∧ S(x) )
Determine whether or not the following statement is a tautology or not and give reasoning. If you need to, you can build a truth table to answer this question. (q→p)∨(∼q→∼p) A. This is a tautology because it is always true for all truth values of p and q. B. This is not a tautology because it is always false for all truth values of p and q. C. This is a tautology because it is not always false for all values of p and q. D. This is not a tautology becasue it is not always true for all truth values of p and q.
Please answer question 2 thank you
Determine whether the following proposition is a tautology.
Question #30 Suppose that the domain of Q(x, y, z) consists of triples x, y, z, where x = 0, 1, or 2, y = 0 or 1, and z = 0 or 1. Write out these propositions using disjunctions and conjunctions. a) vyQ(0, y, 0) b) 3xQ(x, 1, 1) c) 3z-Q(0, 0, z) d) 3x-Q(x, 0, 1) ww.
Question # 2 : Show that each of these conditional statements is a tautologyby using truth tables. a) (p∧q)→p b) p→(p ∨q) c) ￢p →(p →q) d) (p∧q)→(p →q)