Why should a production-volume variance (PVV) that is material be prorated among work-in-process, finished goods, cost and cost of goods sold rather than writing it all off to cost of goods sold? a. If a PVV is always written off to cost of goods sold, then the assets on the balance sheet would be the same as actual costs. b. If a PVV is always written off to cost of goods sold, then the liabilities on the balance sheet would be overstated. c. If a PVV is always written off to cost of goods sold, then the balances in the inventory accounts on the balance sheet would be most accurate. d. If a PVV is always written off to cost of goods sold, a company could set its standard costs to either increase or decrease operating incomes.
Why should a production-volume variance (PVV) that is material be prorated among work-in-process, finished goods, cost and cost of goods sold rather than writing it all off to cost of goods sold?
| a. |
If a PVV is always written off to cost of goods sold, then the assets on the |
|
| b. |
If a PVV is always written off to cost of goods sold, then the liabilities on the balance sheet would be overstated. |
|
| c. |
If a PVV is always written off to cost of goods sold, then the balances in the inventory accounts on the balance sheet would be most accurate. |
|
| d. |
If a PVV is always written off to cost of goods sold, a company could set its |
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
