Why is it so difficult for multinationals to adopt a one-for-all motivation strategy? 2. Why do competition-based techniques work well in Russia but not in Sweden? 3. What recommendations would you suggest for a multinational embarking on a motivation strategy

Understanding Business
12th Edition
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:William Nickels
Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CE
icon
Related questions
Question

This article discusses some of the challenges companies are facing to motivate employees. The article also provides some suggestions as to what can work where.

1. Why is it so difficult for multinationals to adopt a one-for-all motivation strategy?

2. Why do competition-based techniques work well in Russia but not in Sweden?

3. What recommendations would you suggest for a multinational embarking on a motivation strategy?

Workers Struggle to Achieve True Potential in Global Firms
PR Newswire
Global study finds companies are failing to understand what motivates their employees
LONDON, December 11, 2014 /PRNewswire/ --
Companies are unclear on what motivates their staff to learn and improve their skillsets, which is leading to wasted potential, according to a new global study released today by EF Corporate Solutions, the leader in corporate language
training.
"Companies, especially multinationals, need to understand that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to motivating people, particularly when you're dealing with a global workforce," said Peter Burman, President of EF Corporate
Solutions. "There are huge by-country differences; for example, competition-based techniques work well in Russia but in Sweden are one of the least-effective tools. In Brazil, on the other hand, rewards are the most effective
technique.
"Different factors motivate employees to start training from those that keep motivation levels up during a training program. Once companies understand these intricacies, they'll start to see course take-up rates increase. Ultimately, you
want to help people be the best they can be, but how you get them there depends on a lot of things."
This new global study, published by EF, is entitled Decoding motivation: global insight into motivational drivers of corporate training. It is based on data from over 1,000 senior executives responsible for staff development, and
covers 10 countries: Brazil, China, France, Germany, Mexico, Russia, Spain, Sweden, UK and the US. The report aims to shed light on effective motivational techniques and strategies. The study also found:
** 53% of businesses say they often have issues persuading staff to begin and complete courses despite the majority of workers saying they are willing to learn.
** There are big differences between countries in their willingness to undertake training. Some 62% of respondents in Brazil and 60% in China say employees are very willing to undertake training. By contrast European countries are
more sceptical and willingness is lower: Germany (32%), Spain (34%), Sweden, UK and France (all 38%).
** Employees in mature economies are harder to motivate: only 3% of respondents in Germany and 9% in the UK rarely have problems motivating employees to undertake training.
** 81% of respondents see 'rational thought' as having a role in motivation, most notably considerations of career and wage prospects. Companies therefore need to make sure that training has an expected tangible benefit, and that this
is made clear to the employee.
** 57% of respondents see emotions having a role in motivation to begin training, most notably curiosity, enthusiasm & excitement. The employer can try to stimulate these emotions by generating intrigue around the training course
and building a teaser campaign around its launch.
** Surprisingly, companies seem to think that responsibility for motivation to undertake training should lie mainly with the employee. Some 41% of respondents think motivation should be driven mainly by the individual, and another
13% think solely by the individual. This balance needs to be redressed if companies are to reap better returns from their training programs.
The report recommends that companies need to take more of an active role in motivation, and that putting all responsibility on the employee is a sure route to failure. They need to understand what motivates staff, bearing in mind that
the factors will evolve as training progresses and are also likely to differ between countries. They need to create and implement effective strategies that take account of these motivational factors and incorporate a range of techniques.
Only with effective motivation will the benefits of training be fully realised.
Transcribed Image Text:Workers Struggle to Achieve True Potential in Global Firms PR Newswire Global study finds companies are failing to understand what motivates their employees LONDON, December 11, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Companies are unclear on what motivates their staff to learn and improve their skillsets, which is leading to wasted potential, according to a new global study released today by EF Corporate Solutions, the leader in corporate language training. "Companies, especially multinationals, need to understand that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to motivating people, particularly when you're dealing with a global workforce," said Peter Burman, President of EF Corporate Solutions. "There are huge by-country differences; for example, competition-based techniques work well in Russia but in Sweden are one of the least-effective tools. In Brazil, on the other hand, rewards are the most effective technique. "Different factors motivate employees to start training from those that keep motivation levels up during a training program. Once companies understand these intricacies, they'll start to see course take-up rates increase. Ultimately, you want to help people be the best they can be, but how you get them there depends on a lot of things." This new global study, published by EF, is entitled Decoding motivation: global insight into motivational drivers of corporate training. It is based on data from over 1,000 senior executives responsible for staff development, and covers 10 countries: Brazil, China, France, Germany, Mexico, Russia, Spain, Sweden, UK and the US. The report aims to shed light on effective motivational techniques and strategies. The study also found: ** 53% of businesses say they often have issues persuading staff to begin and complete courses despite the majority of workers saying they are willing to learn. ** There are big differences between countries in their willingness to undertake training. Some 62% of respondents in Brazil and 60% in China say employees are very willing to undertake training. By contrast European countries are more sceptical and willingness is lower: Germany (32%), Spain (34%), Sweden, UK and France (all 38%). ** Employees in mature economies are harder to motivate: only 3% of respondents in Germany and 9% in the UK rarely have problems motivating employees to undertake training. ** 81% of respondents see 'rational thought' as having a role in motivation, most notably considerations of career and wage prospects. Companies therefore need to make sure that training has an expected tangible benefit, and that this is made clear to the employee. ** 57% of respondents see emotions having a role in motivation to begin training, most notably curiosity, enthusiasm & excitement. The employer can try to stimulate these emotions by generating intrigue around the training course and building a teaser campaign around its launch. ** Surprisingly, companies seem to think that responsibility for motivation to undertake training should lie mainly with the employee. Some 41% of respondents think motivation should be driven mainly by the individual, and another 13% think solely by the individual. This balance needs to be redressed if companies are to reap better returns from their training programs. The report recommends that companies need to take more of an active role in motivation, and that putting all responsibility on the employee is a sure route to failure. They need to understand what motivates staff, bearing in mind that the factors will evolve as training progresses and are also likely to differ between countries. They need to create and implement effective strategies that take account of these motivational factors and incorporate a range of techniques. Only with effective motivation will the benefits of training be fully realised.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding Business
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:
9781259929434
Author:
William Nickels
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134527604
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:
PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Management
ISBN:
9781305947412
Author:
Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management
ISBN:
9780135191798
Author:
Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:
PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Management
ISBN:
9780134728391
Author:
Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134237473
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:
PEARSON