Why did the creators of the first version of Linux decide to create a non-preemptible kernel? What use does a non-preemptible kernel serve in a system with only one processor? However, why does the benefit disappear with a multi-processor system?

Why did the creators of the first version of Linux decide to create a non-preemptible kernel? What use does a non-preemptible kernel serve in a system with only one processor? However, why does the benefit disappear with a multi-processor system?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

To what end was a non-preemptible kernel developed for Linux?The usage of a non-preemptible kernel in a single-processor system seems unnecessary. Exactly why does using many processors in a single system not provide better results?
Only Linux unifies all of the several concurrent processing techniques that are made accessible by other operating systems.
Why did the original developers of Linux chose a kernel that did not support preemptive multitasking?What are the advantages of using a non-preemptible kernel in a system that only has one processor? Yet, why is the value diminished when using a machine with several processors?
It has never been made explicit why the creators of Linux chose to create a non-preemptive kernel.Just what advantage does a non-preemptible kernel provide in a single-processor system? Why, therefore, does using many processors result in less overall performance improvement?
Linux is the only OS that supports all of the concurrent techniques discussed here. This feature is not available in any other operating system.
Linux is the only operating system that supports all the concurrent approaches covered in this article. Some operating systems lack this capability.
Why did the original developers of Linux choose a kernel that did not support preemptive multitasking? What are the advantages of using a non-preemptible kernel in a system that only has one processor? Yet, why is the value diminished when using a machine with several processors?
Currently, Linux is the only OS that supports all of the concurrent techniques discussed in this piece. This feature is unique to Linux and is not present in any other operating system.
Why did the original Linux developers decide to build a kernel that does not support preemption? What are the benefits of using a non-preemptible kernel in a system that only has one processor? However, why does the benefit become less significant when using a system with several processors?
Linux is the only operating system that has all of the concurrent techniques discussed in this article. Other operating systems lack this functionality.
Linux creators opted for a non-preemptible kernel from the outset because...Can you explain the benefits of a non-preemptible kernel on a single-processor computer? Why does the benefit decrease as the number of processors used increases?
Why did the initial Linux developers choose for a kernel that was not preemptible?In a single processor system, what is the benefit of a non-preemptible kernel? In a multi-processor system, though, why is the benefit reduced?