Which statement best defines the permanent income hypothesis? Consumer spending depends on the level of disposable income that people expect to have over the course of their lifetime. When in a recession, although current consumer spending can be observed, future consumer spending cannot be predicted due to an unknown number of people leaving their temporary recession jobs for higher‑paying, permanent jobs that better fit their skills. Consumer spending depends on both the income and wealth of people in the economy. Consumer spending is proportional to the ratio of people in stable full‑time employment (that is, with "permanent" income) and people in unstable part‑time employment (that is, with "temporary" income). According to the permanent income hypothesis, which situations would result in an immediate increase in consumer spending, which would result in an immediate decrease in consumer spending, and which would result in no change in consumer spending? (Word bank in image) A new technology is discovered that promises an increase in cheap computing power in the future. As a result, expected income increases. Firms announce that they expect more layoffs next year than were previously anticipated. Expectations for the rest of this year, however, do not change. The government unexpectedly gives each person in the economy an extra $1,000 tax refund. However, everyone in the economy expects that exactly this amount (in present value) will have to be paid back in the future in the form of taxes. Researchers announce that they anticipate a breakthrough in the effectiveness of training for low‑skill workers within the next decade. The new training method will allow these low‑skill workers to quickly and cheaply acquire valuable skills that will then place them in better‑paying jobs.
Which statement best defines the permanent income hypothesis? Consumer spending depends on the level of disposable income that people expect to have over the course of their lifetime. When in a recession, although current consumer spending can be observed, future consumer spending cannot be predicted due to an unknown number of people leaving their temporary recession jobs for higher‑paying, permanent jobs that better fit their skills. Consumer spending depends on both the income and wealth of people in the economy. Consumer spending is proportional to the ratio of people in stable full‑time employment (that is, with "permanent" income) and people in unstable part‑time employment (that is, with "temporary" income). According to the permanent income hypothesis, which situations would result in an immediate increase in consumer spending, which would result in an immediate decrease in consumer spending, and which would result in no change in consumer spending? (Word bank in image) A new technology is discovered that promises an increase in cheap computing power in the future. As a result, expected income increases. Firms announce that they expect more layoffs next year than were previously anticipated. Expectations for the rest of this year, however, do not change. The government unexpectedly gives each person in the economy an extra $1,000 tax refund. However, everyone in the economy expects that exactly this amount (in present value) will have to be paid back in the future in the form of taxes. Researchers announce that they anticipate a breakthrough in the effectiveness of training for low‑skill workers within the next decade. The new training method will allow these low‑skill workers to quickly and cheaply acquire valuable skills that will then place them in better‑paying jobs.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
100%
This question has two parts and concerns the permanent income hypothesis.
Which statement best defines the permanent income hypothesis?
Consumer spending depends on the level of disposable income that people expect to have over the course of their lifetime.
When in a recession, although current consumer spending can be observed, future consumer spending cannot be predicted due to an unknown number of people leaving their temporary recession jobs for higher‑paying, permanent jobs that better fit their skills.
Consumer spending depends on both the income and wealth of people in the economy.
Consumer spending is proportional to the ratio of people in stable full‑time employment (that is, with "permanent" income) and people in unstable part‑time employment (that is, with "temporary" income).
According to the permanent income hypothesis, which situations would result in an immediate increase in consumer spending, which would result in an immediate decrease in consumer spending, and which would result in no change in consumer spending?
(Word bank in image)
A new technology is discovered that promises an increase in cheap computing power in the future. As a result, expected income increases. | |
Firms announce that they expect more layoffs next year than were previously anticipated. Expectations for the rest of this year, however, do not change. | |
The government unexpectedly gives each person in the economy an extra $1,000 tax refund. However, everyone in the economy expects that exactly this amount (in present value) will have to be paid back in the future in the form of taxes. | |
Researchers announce that they anticipate a breakthrough in the effectiveness of training for low‑skill workers within the next decade. The new training method will allow these low‑skill workers to quickly and cheaply acquire valuable skills that will then place them in better‑paying jobs. |
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education