Which of the following habitat cues is LEAST likely to factor into how the “landscape of fear and disgust” influences habitat choice?Presence of carcassesHigh density of conspecific excreta (poop!)Presence of vegetative coverFrequency of territorial singing from conspecific malesBayesian updating can be a useful tool for thinking about the development of behavior. Imagine the following scenario with respect to an animal’s knowledge of the average density of food in patches in their environment. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this Bayesian view of this animal? (shown in image)Their environment is much richer in food resources than expectedTheir confidence in their assessment of the state of the environment is greater after they go out and sample the worldTheir environment is less rich than expected – perhaps there is a drought that has caused a crash in food availability relative to historical conditionsAll of the above probabilityLOWexperienceupdated/posterioraverage density of food in patchespriorHIGH

“Since you have asked multiple question, we will solve the first question for you. If you want any…

Answered: Which of the following habitat cues is…

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)

11th Edition

ISBN:9780134580999

Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn

Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn

Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Concept explainers

Question

Which of the following habitat cues is LEAST likely to factor into how the “landscape of fear and disgust” influences habitat choice?
1. Presence of carcasses
2. High density of conspecific excreta (poop!)
3. Presence of vegetative cover
4. Frequency of territorial singing from conspecific males
Bayesian updating can be a useful tool for thinking about the development of behavior. Imagine the following scenario with respect to an animal’s knowledge of the average density of food in patches in their environment. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of this Bayesian view of this animal? (shown in image)
1. Their environment is much richer in food resources than expected
2. Their confidence in their assessment of the state of the environment is greater after they go out and sample the world
3. Their environment is less rich than expected – perhaps there is a drought that has caused a crash in food availability relative to historical conditions
4. All of the above

probability
LOW
experience
updated/posterior
average density of food in patches
prior
HIGH

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions