Which of the following are examples of the correct application/interpretation of the going concern assumption? Select one: O a. The sole shareholder of Monterey Bay Awnings, Inc. plans to liquidate the business in 15 to 20 years, but still continues record acquired assets at historical cost. Ob. IBM, a stable company, reports the historical cost of its fixed assets in its balance sheet. c. Trexco, a company filing for liquidation, has restated its balance sheet to show the estimated net realizable value of its assets. d. Both B and C are correct examples. e. All the above are correct examples.

Which of the following are examples of the correct application/interpretation of the going concern assumption? Select one: O a. The sole shareholder of Monterey Bay Awnings, Inc. plans to liquidate the business in 15 to 20 years, but still continues record acquired assets at historical cost. Ob. IBM, a stable company, reports the historical cost of its fixed assets in its balance sheet. c. Trexco, a company filing for liquidation, has restated its balance sheet to show the estimated net realizable value of its assets. d. Both B and C are correct examples. e. All the above are correct examples.

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please Assist in this question (a) During the current period SP Ltd sold inventory to its wholly owned subsidiary, Jaza Ltd, for $15 000. These items previously cost Sp Ltd $12 000. JazaLtd subsequently sold half the items to Nanjing Ltd for $8000. The tax rate is 30%. The group accountant for SP Ltd, Steve yu, maintains that the appropriate consolidation adjustment entries are as follows: Required (i) Discuss whether the entries suggested Steve Yu are correct, explaining on a line-by-line basis the correct adjustment entry. (ii)Determine the consolidation worksheet entries in the following year, assuming the inventory has been –sold, and explain the adjustments on a line-by-line basis. (b) On 1 July 2016 Henna Ltd sold an item of plant to Jordy Ltd for $450000 when its’ carrying value in Henna Ltd book was $600000 (costs $900000, accumulated depreciation $300000). This plant has a remaining useful life of five (5) years form the date of sale. The group measures its property plants and…
On January 1, 2011, Jordan Inc. acquired 30% of Nico Corp. Jordan used the equity method to account for the investment. On January 1, 2012, Jordan sold two-thirds of its investment in Nico. It no longer had the ability to exercise significant influence over the operations of Nico. How should Jordan have accounted for this change? Multiple Choice Jordan should restate the prior years' financial statements and change the balance in the investment account as if the fair-value method had been used since 2011. Jordan should report the effect of the change from the equity to the fair-value method as a retrospective change in accounting principle. Jordan should continue to use the equity method to maintain consistency in its financial statements. Jordan has the option of using either the equity method or the fair-value method for 2011 and future years. Jordan should use the fair-value method for 2012 and future years but should not make a retrospective adjustment to the investment account.
Jessica Ltd sold inventory during the current period to its wholly owned subsidiary, Amelie Ltd, for $15 000. These items previously cost Jessica Ltd $12 000. Amelie Ltd subsequently sold half the items to Ningbo Ltd for$8000. The tax rate is 30%. The group accountant for Jessica Ltd, Li Chen, maintains that the appropriate consolidation adjustment entries are attached. Please answer: (i) Discuss whether the entries suggested by Li Chen are correct, explaining on a line-by-line basis the correct adjustment entry. (ii)Determine the consolidation worksheet entries in the following year, assuming the inventory has been –sold, and explain the adjustments on a line-by-line basis.
PLEASE GIVE ANSWER 13&14 BOTH
Bellow are elements in the financial statements on which the director of ABC Building Limited require advice: • In 2016, ABC Building Limited acquired several properties as investment properties. Since ABC has not adopted accounting policy in accounting for property as investment properties before, the financial director considered such adoption is change in accounting policy. ABC Building Limited has no investment property before 2016. • In 2018, ABC Building Limited proposed to change to the cost model instead of fair value model in accounting for its investment property in accordance with PSAK 13. Its financial director considered whether ABC could make such changes and, if change could be made, how ABC should account for the changes • In 2020, ABC Building limited decided to make a change in estimate as to the duration of depreciation of its building, increasing it from 20 to 30 years. Please Discuss how the above items should be dealt with in the financial statements of ABC…
Please don,t copy from bartleby and don't give image based answer..thanku
Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
After conducting a thorough review of the company’s fi nancial statements, Martinez concludes the following:Conclusion 1 Although Stellar’s fi nancial statements adhere to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Stellar understates earnings in periods whenthe company is performing well and overstates earnings in periods whenthe company is struggling.Conclusion 2 Stellar most likely understated the value of amortizable intangibles whenrecording the acquisition of Solar, Inc. last year. No goodwill impairmentcharges have been taken since the acquisition.Conclusion 3 Over time, the accruals component of Stellar’s earnings is large relative tothe cash component.Conclusion 4 Stellar reported an unusually sharp decline in accounts receivable in thecurrent year, and an increase in long-term trade receivables.2 . Based on Conclusion 2, after the acquisition of Solar, Stellar’s earnings are most likely :A . understated.B . fairly stated.C . overstated
Blue Corp. purchased 100% of the stock of Magenta Corp. in 1984 for $300,000. Early this year, Magenta was liquidated. Blue Corp. received all of Magenta’s assets, which had a basis to Magenta Corp. of $420,000 and a FMV of $440,000. Assume the requirements of §332 were satisfied. What about of gain will Blue Corp. recognize any gain as a result of the liquidation?
For which of the corporate distributions listed below may loss be recognized? Question options: A dividend of property with a basis of $500,000 and a value of $450,000 Securities with a value of $500,000 and a basis of $550,000 distributed to its shareholders pro-rata as part of a complete liquidation; the securities were bought by the corporation three years ago with internal funds. Land with a value of $400,000 and a basis of $470,000 distributed to a 70% shareholder pursuant to a complete liquidation; the land was contributed by the same shareholder 20 months before the liquidation
On May 1, Soriano Co. reported the following account balances along with their estimated fair values:On that day, Zambrano paid cash to acquire all of the assets and liabilities of Soriano, which will cease to exist as a separate entity. To facilitate the merger, Zambrano also paid $100,000 to an investment banking firm.The following information was also available:• Zambrano further agreed to pay an extra $70,000 to the former owners of Soriano only if they meet certain revenue goals during the next two years. Zambrano estimated the present value of its probability adjusted expected payment for this contingency at $35,000.• Soriano has a research and development project in process with an appraised value of $200,000. However, the project has not yet reached technological feasibility and the project’s assets have no alternative future use.Prepare Zambrano’s journal entries to record the Soriano acquisition assuming its initial cash payment to the former owners wasa. $700,000.b.…
HOW DOES A COMPANY REALLY DECIDE WHICH INVESTMENT METHOD TO APPLY? Pilgrim Products, Inc., buys a controlling interest in the common stock of Crestwood Corporation. Shortly after the acquisition, a meeting of Pilgrim's accounting department is convened to discuss the internal reporting procedures required by the ownership of this subsidiary. Each member of the staff has a definite opinion as to whether the equity method, initial value method, or partial equity method should be adopted. To resolve this issue, Pilgrim's chief financial officer outlines several of her concerns about the decision. I already understand how each method works. I know the general advantages and disadvantages of all three. I realize, for example, that the equity method provides more detailed information whereas the initial value method is much easier to apply. What I need to know are the factors specific to our situation that should be considered in deciding which method to adopt. I must make a recommendation…