Which is thought to be an “unintended consequence” of campaign spending limits introduced in California in 2000? a) increased reliance on grassroots volunteers b) a significant decrease in campaign spending c) fewer women and minority candidates winning elections d) an increase in independent expenditures
Which is thought to be an “unintended consequence” of campaign spending limits introduced in California in 2000? a) increased reliance on grassroots volunteers b) a significant decrease in campaign spending c) fewer women and minority candidates winning elections d) an increase in independent expenditures
Related questions
Question
Which is thought to be an “unintended consequence” of campaign spending limits introduced in California in 2000?
a) increased reliance on grassroots volunteers
b) a significant decrease in campaign spending
c) fewer women and minority candidates winning elections
d) an increase in independent expenditures
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
