Which is not a valid, acceptable reason for companies to merge? Synergistic benefits arising from mergers. Reduction in competition resulting from mergers. Acquisition of assets at below replacement value. Attempts to minimize taxes by acquiring a firm with large accumulated losses that can be used immediately. Using surplus cash to acquire another firm and prevent unfavorable tax consequences for shareholders

Which is not a valid, acceptable reason for companies to merge? Synergistic benefits arising from mergers. Reduction in competition resulting from mergers. Acquisition of assets at below replacement value. Attempts to minimize taxes by acquiring a firm with large accumulated losses that can be used immediately. Using surplus cash to acquire another firm and prevent unfavorable tax consequences for shareholders

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The cost of a merger may outweigh the potential gain if the: present value of the acquired firm exceeds the price paid for it. acquired firm's shareholders receive more than the value of their firm. present value of the merged firms is greater than the sum of their individual values. merger allows cost savings to occur.
Assume a M&M frictionless world EXCEPT that there are Corporate level taxes only. Under these assumptions, capital structure is irrelevant in that changing capital structure has no impact on the value of the firm. Group of answer choices True False
Which of the following statements is CORRECT? * Assume a corporation has less debt than what is ideal. Increasing the use of debt to reach its optimum capital structure would lower the cost of both debt and equity financing. There is no reason to believe that changes in the personal tax rate will have an effect on firms' capital structure decisions. Assuming everything else is equal, a firm with high business risk is more likely to increase the use of financial leverage than a firm with low business risk. In general, a company with low operating leverage has a small percentage of its total costs in the form of fixed costs. If a company's after-tax cost of equity exceeds its after-tax cost of debt, it can still lower its WACC by using more debt.
Companies cannot as a general rule reduce the capital of the business. However, there may be a class of capital which can be redeemed. Explain the accounting treatment necessary in a redemption of share capital. Illustrate your answer with your own numerical example.
It is generally argued that the takeover constraint : Deters management from engaging in opportunistic behavior. Deters management from considering acquiring other companies. Deters management from declaring dividends. Deters management from increasing a firm’s level of borrowing.
Transferring corporate assets to shareholders for less than fair market value is a form of Multiple Choice looting. piercing. authorizing. capitalizing.
Which of the following would reduce a firm's WACC after tax? a. A firm invests in an average-risk project using equity, rather than debt financing. b. A supermarket chain decides to establish hardware stores which increases its systematic risk. c. A firm issues shares and uses the proceeds to pay off a bank loan. d. A firm issues bonds and uses the proceeds to repurchase stock. e. A firm significantly improves its operating cost control to boost profits.
4. Classify each of the following factors/cases based on whether they favor a low dividend policy or high dividend policy? (explain why) A. The tax on capital gains is deferred until the gain is realized. B. Few, if any, positive net present value projects are available to a firm. C. A majority of the shareholders have a low tax rate. D. A majority of the shareholders have better investment opportunities than the firm. E The presence of an agency conflict with the company's senior managers.
Suppose managers of a firm know that the company is approaching financial distress. Should the managers borrow from creditors and issue a large one-time dividend to shareholders? How might creditors control this potential transfer of wealth?
Empirical evidence suggests that IPO issues are generally: priced efficiently by the market. overpriced by investor excitement concerning a new issue. underpriced resulting from SEC regulation. underpriced, in part, to facilitate the issue. overpriced resulting from SEC regulation.
Empirical evidence indicates that the returns to shareholders of the target firm vary significantly from the returns to the shareholders of the acquiring firm. Identify the shareholders that tend to realize the smaller return and provide some possible explanation for these low returns.
The following are some of the factors that influence the market price of a corporation: I. Industry prospects where the company operates II. Dividend declaration III. Management competency in terms of operating efficiency of the company IV. Profitability and good liquidity of the business Which of the above are external factors uncontrollable by the management? II and III None of the above II, III, and IV I and IV