Which best describes why the multiplier exist

Assume that the unintended investment is negative. Briefly outline how the level of Ye will change in response to this. how is the impact of change related to the size of the multiplier?

Explain the concept of the 100X Multiplier using the idea of diminishing marginal utility.

suppose that Sean, an economist from a university in Arizona, and Yvette, an economist from a university in Massachusetts, are arguing over saving incentives. The following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate: Yvette: I think it's safe to say that, in general, the savings rate of households in today's economy is much lower than it really needs to be to sustain an improvement in living standards. Sean: I think a switch from the income tax to a consumption tax would bring growth in living standards. Yvette: You really think households would change their saving behavior enough in response to this to make a difference? Because I don't.   The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to  differences in scientific judments/differences between perception versus reality/ or differences in values  .   #2 Despite their differences, with which proposition are two economists chosen at random most likely to agree? Tariffs and import quotas generally reduce…

Explain carefully how the multiplier works, defining the multiplier as part of your explanation. If the marginal propensity to save is smaller, explain carefully and fully how this affects the size of the multiplier.

Veer

Agreement and disagreement among economists Suppose that Musashi, an economist from a business administration program in Georgia, and Rina, another economist from a nonprofit institution in the Midwest, are both guests on a popular science podcast. The host of the podcast is facilitating their debate over saving incentives. The following dialogue represents a portion of the transcript of their discussion:   Rina: I think it's safe to say that, in general, the savings rate of households in today's economy is much lower than it really needs to be to sustain an improvement in living standards.   Musashi: I think a switch from the income tax to a consumption tax would bring growth in living standards.   Rina: You really think households would change their saving behavior enough in response to this to make a difference? Because I don't.   The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PERCEPTION VERSUS REALITY or DIFFERENCES IN SCIENTIFIC JUDGEMENTS…

Could you say that the consumers are a significant aspect of an economy? If so, why?

What is your MPC? Would a welfare recipient and a millionaire have the same MPC? What determines a person’s MPC?

What is the difference between consumption and autonomous consumption?