When is the timing of substantive procedures most flexible? O detection risk is assessed as low O there is a lack of an effective control environment O controls have been tested and are determined to be ineffective O controls have been tested and are determined to be effective

When is the timing of substantive procedures most flexible? O detection risk is assessed as low O there is a lack of an effective control environment O controls have been tested and are determined to be ineffective O controls have been tested and are determined to be effective

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Study and Evaluation of Management Control. The study and evaluation of management risk mitigation control is not easy. First, auditors must determine the risks and the controls subject to audit. Then they must find a standard by which performance of the control can be evaluated. Next they must specify procedures to obtain the evidence on which an evaluationcan be based. Insofar as possible, the standards and related evidence must be quantified. The following description gives certain information (in italics) that internal auditors would know about or be able to determine on their own. Fulfilling the requirement thus amounts to taking some information from the scenario and figuring out other things by using accountants’ and auditors’ common sense.The ScenarioAce Corporation ships building materials to more than a thousand wholesale and retail customers in a five-state region. The company’s normal credit terms are net/30 days, and no cash discounts are offered. Fred Clark is the chief…
Which of the following is correct about control risk? Select one: a. None of the others b. The risk that a material misstatement could occur in a relevant assertion and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the entity’s internal control. c. It is an alternative to substantive testing d. It is the same as inherent risk.
When is more frequent monitoring of internal controls not required?* When employees are poorly trained. When the control activity and risk being managed are important. When a department is making changes to an application being used in that department. When internal controls have recently been changed to reduce the frequency of errors.
Why is the audit team more concerned with controlling the exposure to the risk of overreliancethan with the risk of underreliance?a. Only the risk of overreliance results in an incorrect audit decision.b. The risk of underreliance is not related to the audit team’s study and evaluation of internalcontrol.c. The risk of overreliance can ultimately result in the audit team’s failing to reduce auditrisk to acceptable levels.d. The risk of underreliance can be controlled by performing tests of controls during theinterim period.
If tests of controls induce the auditor to change the assessed level of control risk for Property, Plant, and Equipment from moderate to high, and audit risk and inherent risk remain constant, the acceptable level of detection risk
Non-sampling risk, and more specifically the risk of assessing control risk too low (risk of overreliance), cannot be eliminated, but it can be controlled. TRUE OR FALSE? WHY?
The difference between assessing control risk for IT control activities versus assessing control risk for manual control activities is best described as follows: Multiple Choice О in a manual environment it is important for the auditor to gain an understanding of the internal control activity before assessing control risk. О in an IT environment, it is not important to gain an understanding of the internal control activity before assessing control risk. О In an IT environment, it is likely that control risk will be assessed as low on largely all audit engagements. О the assessment process that needs to be undertaken for IT controls is essentially the same as would be taken for manual controls.