What is the most appropriate technical conclusion inferred from the results comparing means by rows or housekeepers, based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance? {Select the best response.} a. highly reject the null hypothesis b. * reject the null hypothesis C. marginally reject the null hypothesis d. highly fail to reject the null hypothesis е. fail to reject the null hypothesis f. marginally fail to reject the null hypothesis QUESTION 20 What is the most appropriate contextual conclusion inferred for rows, comparing means by housekeepers, again based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance? {Select the best response.} a. It is marginally reasonable to claim all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. D. It is reasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. It is highly reasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. It is marginally unreasonable to claim all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. e. It is unreasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. f. It is highly unreasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

SEC 0.3.1

After copying the two-way data table into a spreadsheet and utilizing its built-in data analysis toolpak for ANOVA: Two-Factor
Without Replication, the following output resulted when checking the box for labels (i.e., row and column headers) and alpha
equal to 0.1:
Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication
SUMMARY Count
Sum
Average Variance
Ari
7
256 36.57143 24.95238
Betty
7
278 39.71429
13.2381
Carlos
7
260 37.14286 37.80952
Dante
7
323 46.14286 4.142857
Enid
7
277 39.57143 28.61905
Fatima
7
295 42.14286 10.47619
S
252
42
34.8
M
238 39.66667 19.46667
6
252
42
42.4
W
227 37.83333 40.96667
T
244 40.66667 10.66667
F
255
42.5
18.7
221 36.83333 28.16667
ANOVA
Source of Variation
SS
df
MS
F
P-value
F crit
Rows
435.6429
5 87.12857 4.838769 0.002312 2.049246
Columns
175.2381
6 29.20635 1.622003 0.175507 1.980333
Error
540.1905
30 18.00635
Total
1151.071
41
O O O cO
Transcribed Image Text:After copying the two-way data table into a spreadsheet and utilizing its built-in data analysis toolpak for ANOVA: Two-Factor Without Replication, the following output resulted when checking the box for labels (i.e., row and column headers) and alpha equal to 0.1: Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance Ari 7 256 36.57143 24.95238 Betty 7 278 39.71429 13.2381 Carlos 7 260 37.14286 37.80952 Dante 7 323 46.14286 4.142857 Enid 7 277 39.57143 28.61905 Fatima 7 295 42.14286 10.47619 S 252 42 34.8 M 238 39.66667 19.46667 6 252 42 42.4 W 227 37.83333 40.96667 T 244 40.66667 10.66667 F 255 42.5 18.7 221 36.83333 28.16667 ANOVA Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit Rows 435.6429 5 87.12857 4.838769 0.002312 2.049246 Columns 175.2381 6 29.20635 1.622003 0.175507 1.980333 Error 540.1905 30 18.00635 Total 1151.071 41 O O O cO
What is the most appropriate technical conclusion inferred from the results comparing means by rows or
housekeepers, based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance? {Select the best
response.}
а.
· highly reject the null hypothesis
O b.
reject the null hypothesis
C.
marginally reject the null hypothesis
d. highly fail to reject the null hypothesis
е.
fail to reject the null hypothesis
O f.
marginally fail to reject the null hypothesis
QUESTION 20
What is the most appropriate contextual conclusion inferred for rows, comparing means by housekeepers, again
based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance? {Select the best response.}
a. It is marginally reasonable to claim all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers.
b.
It is reasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers.
C.
It is highly reasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers.
d.
· It is marginally unreasonable to claim all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers.
е.
8. It is unreasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers.
f.
It is highly unreasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers.
Transcribed Image Text:What is the most appropriate technical conclusion inferred from the results comparing means by rows or housekeepers, based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance? {Select the best response.} а. · highly reject the null hypothesis O b. reject the null hypothesis C. marginally reject the null hypothesis d. highly fail to reject the null hypothesis е. fail to reject the null hypothesis O f. marginally fail to reject the null hypothesis QUESTION 20 What is the most appropriate contextual conclusion inferred for rows, comparing means by housekeepers, again based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance? {Select the best response.} a. It is marginally reasonable to claim all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. b. It is reasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. C. It is highly reasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. d. · It is marginally unreasonable to claim all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. е. 8. It is unreasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers. f. It is highly unreasonable to claim that all means are equal, when considered by housekeepers.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman