Solve for all parts of the question correctly please In 2010, shortly before a country's midterm elections, people in that country were dissatisfied with government and 55% of adults in the country thought that a third major party was needed. In arecent poll, 59% of 1162 adults in the country felt the same way. At the 2% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of all adults in the countrywho now think that a third major party is needed has changed from that in 2010? Use the one-proportion z-test to perform the appropriate hypothesis test......What are the hypotheses for the one-proportion z-test?; Ha: pHo: p=(Type integers or decimals.)What is the test statistic?(Round to two decimal places as needed.)Identify the P-value.The P-value is(Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is the correct conclusion for the hypothesis test?A. Reject Ho; the data do provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage has changed from 55%.B. Do not reject Ho; the data do provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage has changed from 55%.C. Reject Ho; the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage has changed from 55%.O D. Do not reject Ho; the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage has changed from 55%.

Given data : sample size, n = 1162 population proportion,p= 0.55 Significance level, α= 0.02 sample proportion p̂= x/n= 0.59solution : Hypothesis test : The null and alternative hypothesis is Ho : p = 0.55 Ha : p ≠ 0.55 The hypothesis test is a two tailed test Test statistic : Test statistic for one proportion z test is = 0.59 - 0.55 /√( 0.55 (1- 0.55 )/ 1162 = 2.74 The test statistic is 2.74 P-value : p-value with test statistic z= 2.74 is P-value =2P(Z>|Zobs|) = 2 x P(z >| 2.74 |) = 0.006 ....... (from standard normal distribution table) ∴ P-value is 0.006 Decision : since P-value is less than significance level,α = 0.02 ,we reject the null hypothesis Decision is reject Ho Conclusion : There is sufficient evidence to support the claim therefore option a) is correct answer A. Reject Ho; the data do provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage has changed from 55%.