Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
Political Science
What effect does this decision have on the Missouri Compromise of 1820? What effect does this decision have on the ability of AfricanAmericans to make their legal claims heard?

What effect does this decision have on the Missouri Compromise of 1820? What effect does this decision have on the ability of AfricanAmericans to make their legal claims heard?

icon
Related questions
Question

What effect does this decision have on the Missouri Compromise of 1820? What effect does this decision have on the ability of AfricanAmericans to make their legal claims heard?

CANADA OPEDON COUNTRY MONGA INORA EerORY PA OHO e WY POREC N CAROLIN TEM ANAS TERNTORY CARA Oksed Comproe Conom Open Foe Dred Scott case Born into slavery in Virginia around 1800, Dred Scott traveled westward to St. Louis with his master, Peter Blow, for almost thirty years. Following his master's death, Scott was sold to an army surgeon named John Emerson. Emerson's army unit soon transferred to Illinois and then Wisconsin. Though slavery was outlawed in these territories, many army officers brought their slaves with them. It was in Wisconsin that Scott married Harriet Robinson, who then also belonged to John Emerson. By 1842 the Scotts were back in St. Louis. The following year, Emerson died and ownership of the Scotts passed to Emerson's widow. It was at this point that Scott attempted to purchase his freedom from Mrs. Emerson, but she refused his offer. Following the refusal, Dred Scott sued for his freedom in a Missouri court in 1846. This started a long legal battle that eventually ended up at the Supreme Court. It should be noted that soon after 1846, Mrs. Emerson sold the Scotts to her brother, John Sandford, who lived in New York. Since the case now concerned parties from different states, the Scotts were allowed to bring their case before the Supreme Court. When the decision was read in March 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney handed down the majority position. The decision effectively and legally labeled the Scotts non-citizens that lacked the right to appear before the Court.
Transcribed Image Text:CANADA OPEDON COUNTRY MONGA INORA EerORY PA OHO e WY POREC N CAROLIN TEM ANAS TERNTORY CARA Oksed Comproe Conom Open Foe Dred Scott case Born into slavery in Virginia around 1800, Dred Scott traveled westward to St. Louis with his master, Peter Blow, for almost thirty years. Following his master's death, Scott was sold to an army surgeon named John Emerson. Emerson's army unit soon transferred to Illinois and then Wisconsin. Though slavery was outlawed in these territories, many army officers brought their slaves with them. It was in Wisconsin that Scott married Harriet Robinson, who then also belonged to John Emerson. By 1842 the Scotts were back in St. Louis. The following year, Emerson died and ownership of the Scotts passed to Emerson's widow. It was at this point that Scott attempted to purchase his freedom from Mrs. Emerson, but she refused his offer. Following the refusal, Dred Scott sued for his freedom in a Missouri court in 1846. This started a long legal battle that eventually ended up at the Supreme Court. It should be noted that soon after 1846, Mrs. Emerson sold the Scotts to her brother, John Sandford, who lived in New York. Since the case now concerned parties from different states, the Scotts were allowed to bring their case before the Supreme Court. When the decision was read in March 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney handed down the majority position. The decision effectively and legally labeled the Scotts non-citizens that lacked the right to appear before the Court.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer