WellLiberty Well 124-Hr Test (bbl)Days Produced2030Freedom Well A-13526Dyson Powell5024Total Production Sold2,900 measured at pointof deliveryAssume the data above for the following wells commingled production in Tank Battery on the Premise Lease located inFayette County, Texas. Cameron Oil Company (70% WI) and Garcia Company (30% WI) own a joint working interest inthe Dowling Field. The expected selling price was $60/bbl. The royalty interest is 1/5 and the severance tax rate is 10%.What amount of gross revenue, royalty, severance taxes, and net revenue should Cameron Oil Company recordfor each well (Liberty Well 1, Freedom Well A-1, and Dyson Powell)?Focus

Step 1: Calculate the total revenue from the oil sold. Given that the total production sold is 2,900…

Answered: Well Liberty Well 1 24-Hr Test (bbl)…

Principles of Accounting Volume 1

19th Edition

ISBN:9781947172685

Author:OpenStax

Publisher:OpenStax

Chapter11: Long-term Assets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PB: Underwoods Miners recently purchased the rights to a diamond mine. It is estimated that there are...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In this assignment you will need to perform an analysis on a hypothetical discovery based on the following information: Field Size 1.4 Tcf Production/Reserve Ratio 7% of the original field size starting producing year 3 Gas Price $3.5/Mcf CapEx $1/Mcf capitalized in 5 years, straight-line depreciation Operating Cost $0.8/Mcf Royalty 10% Government Take 40% Cost recovery limit 60% of gross revenue Discount Rate 10% Income Tax Rate 33% Allow cost recovery carry forward 1. Evaluate the discovery – you need to calculate the total worth, worth to the company, government take, value in terms of entitlement interest and working interest. 2. Evaluate the producing gas reserve – total worth, worth to the company, government take, value in terms of entitlement interest and working interest.
what is the 0.46 means? Why 15m need to times the 0.46? What is the answer means? What is the 552 means? Why it need to times the 6.9m with 8%?
of equipment have an initial investment of $728,831. The net cash flows estimated for the two proposals are as follows: Net Cash Flow Net Cash Flow Year Diamond Core Drill Hydraulic Excavator 1 $233,000 $291,000 23 4569 207,000 270,000 207,000 249,000 165,000 256,000 126,000 7 8 105,000 91,000 91,000 The estimated residual value of the diamond core drill at the end of Year 4 is $290,000. Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20% 1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833 2 -0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694 3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579 7 45 65 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279 8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233 9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194 10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162 Determine which equipment should be favored, comparing the net present values of the two proposals and assuming a minimum rate of return of 12%. Use the present value table appearing above. Diamond Core Drill Hydraulic…
Underwoods Miners recently purchased the rights to a diamond mine. It is estimated that there are two million tons of ore within the mine. Underwoods paid $46,000,000 for the rights and expects to harvest the ore over the next fifteen years. The following is the expected extraction for the next five years. Year 1: 50,000 tons Year 2: 900,000 tons Year 3: 400,000 tons Year 4: 210,000 tons Year 5: 150,000 tons Calculate the depletion expense for the next five years and create the journal entry for year one.
Andronicus Corporation (AC) has the following jumbled information about an investment proposal: a. Revenues in each of years 1-4 = $21,000 b. Year O initial investment = $41,000 c. Inventory level = $10,500 in year 1, $11,100 in year 2, and $5,500 in year 3 d. Production costs = $7,300 in each of years 1-4 e. Salvage value = $12,100 in year 4 f. Depreciation = 100% immediate bonus depreciation g. Tax rate = 21% h. There is an additional 6-month lag for all cash flows after year O. For example, customers pay consistently with a 6-month lag, as AC does for production costs, taxes, etc. Draw up a set of cash flow forecasts as in Table 6.4. If the cost of capital is 10%, what is the project's NPV? Assume that, if the project generates losses, those losses can be used to offset profits for tax purposes elsewhere in the business. Note: Do not round your intermediate calculations. Round your final answer to the nearest whole dollar amount. NPV Answer is complete but not entirely correct. $…
napters 11, 12, 13, & 14) Drilling Experts, Inc. Drilling Experts, Inc. (DEI) finds and develops oil properties and then sells the successful ones to major oil refining companies. DEI is now considering a new potential field, and its geologists have developed the following data, in thousands of dollars. A $400 feasibility study would be conducted att=0. The results of this study would determine if the company should commence drilling operations or make no further investment and abandon the project. t=0. If the feasibility study indicates good potential, the firm would spend $1.000 at t=1 to drill exploratory wells. The best estimate is that there is an 80% probability that the exploratory wells would indicate good potential and thus that further work would be done, and a 20% probability that the outlook would look bad and the project would be abandoned. t=1. If the exploratory wells test positive. DEI would go ahead and spend $10,000 to obtain an accurate estimate of the amount of oil…
The following data are accumulated by Lone Star Security in evaluating two competing investment proposals. Category Surveillance Equipment Patrol Truck Amount of Investment $40,500 $55,000 Useful life 8 years 11 years Estimated residual value $3,000 $6,000 Estimated total income over the useful life $25,000 $38,700 Determine the expected average rate of return for each proposal. Year Net Income Net Cash Flow Year 1 $43,500 $81,000 Year 2 26,500 64,000 Year 3 13,500 50,500 Year 4 2,900 40,000 The following data are accumulated by Geddes Company in evaluating the purchase of $150,000 of equipment, having a four-year useful life: Assuming that the desired rate of return is 15%, determine the net present value for the proposal. Use the table of the present value of $1 appearing in Exhibit 2 of this chapter. Would management be likely to look with favor on the proposal? Explain.
Norton Products, Inc., manufactures potentiometers. (A potentiometer is a device that adjusts electrical resistance.) Currently, all parts necessary for the assembly of products are produced internally. Norton has a single plant located in Wichita, Kansas. The facilities for the manufacture of potentiometers are leased, with five years remaining on the lease. All equipment is owned by the company. Because of increases in demand, production has been expanded significantly over the five years of operation, straining the capacity of the leased facilities. Currently, the company needs more warehousing and office space, as well as more space for the production of plastic moldings. The current output of these moldings, used to make potentiometers, needs to be expanded to accommodate the increased demand for the main product. Leo Tidwell, owner and president of Norton Products, has asked his vice president of marketing, John Tidwell, and his vice president of finance, Linda Thayn, to meet and discuss the problem of limited capacity. This is the second meeting the three have had concerning the problem. In the first meeting, Leo rejected Lindas proposal to build the companys own plant. He believed it was too risky to invest the capital necessary to build a plant at this stage of the companys development. The combination of leasing a larger facility and subleasing the current plant was also considered but was rejected; subleasing would be difficult, if not impossible. At the end of the first meeting, Leo asked John to explore the possibility of leasing another facility comparable to the current one. He also assigned Linda the task of identifying other possible solutions. As the second meeting began, Leo asked John to give a report on the leasing alternative. JOHN: After some careful research, Im afraid that the idea of leasing an additional plant is not a very good one. Although we have some space problems, our current level of production doesnt justify another plant. In fact, I expect it will be at least five years before we need to be concerned about expanding into another facility like the one we have now. My market studies reveal a modest growth in sales over the next five years. All this growth can be absorbed by our current production capacity. The large increases in demand that we experienced the past five years are not likely to be repeated. Leasing another plant would be an overkill solution. LEO: Even modest growth will aggravate our current space problems. As you both know, we are already operating three production shifts. But, John, you are rightexcept for plastic moldings, we could expand production, particularly during the graveyard shift. Linda, I hope that you have been successful in identifying some other possible solutions. Some fairly quick action is needed. LINDA: Fortunately, I believe that I have two feasible alternatives. One is to rent an additional building to be used for warehousing. By transferring our warehousing needs to the new building, we will free up internal space for offices and for expanding the production of plastic moldings. I have located a building within two miles of our plant that we could use. It has the capacity to handle our current needs and the modest growth that John mentioned. The second alternative may be even more attractive. We currently produce all the parts that we use to manufacture potentiometers, including shafts and bushings. In the last several months, the market has been flooded with these two parts. Prices have tumbled as a result. It might be better to buy shafts and bushings instead of making them. If we stop internal production of shafts and bushings, this would free up the space we need. Well, Leo, what do you think? Are these alternatives feasible? Or should I continue my search for additional solutions? LEO: I like both alternatives. In fact, they are exactly the types of solutions we need to consider. All we have to do now is choose the one best for our company. Required: 1. Define the problem facing Norton Products. 2. Identify all the alternatives that were considered by Norton Products. Which ones were classified as not feasible? Why? Now identify the feasible alternatives. 3. For the feasible alternatives, what are some potential costs and benefits associated with each alternative? Of the costs that you have identified, which do you think are relevant to the decision?
The following data are accumulated by Lone Star Security in evaluating two competing investment proposals. Category Surveillance Equipment Patrol Truck Amount of investment $40,000 $55,000 Useful life 8 years 11 years Estimated residual value $3,000 $6,000 Estimated total income over the useful life $25,000 $38,700 Determine the expected average rate of return for each proposal. Year Net Income Net Cash Flow Year 1 $43,500 $81,000 Year 2 26,500 64,000 Year 3 13,500 50,500 Year 4 2,900 40,000
Required information [The following Information applies to the questions displayed below] Following is information on an investment in a manufacturing machine. The machine has zero salvage value. The company requires a 6% return from its investments. Initial investment Net cash flowS Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Compute this machine's net present value (PV of $1. FV of $1. PVA of $1. and EVA of S1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided. Round all present value factors to 4 decimal places. Round present value amounts to the nearest dollar.) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Totals Initial investment Net present value Net Cash Flow $ (360,000) 120,000 126,000 87,000 $ 0 Present Value Factor Present Value of Net Cash Flows $ $ 0
s
None

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Accounting Volume 1

Accounting

ISBN:

9781947172685

Author:

OpenStax

Publisher:

OpenStax College

Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…

Accounting

ISBN:

9781305970663

Author:

Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305627734

Author:

Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Accounting Volume 1

Accounting

ISBN:

9781947172685

Author:

OpenStax

Publisher:

OpenStax College

Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…

Accounting

ISBN:

9781305970663

Author:

Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course …

Statistics

ISBN:

9781305627734

Author:

Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines…

Accounting

ISBN:

9781337115773

Author:

Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)

Accounting

ISBN:

9781305961883

Author:

Carl Warren

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Excel Applications for Accounting Principles

Accounting

ISBN:

9781111581565

Author:

Gaylord N. Smith

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS