Watching all these drones buzz back and forth is giving you eyestrain. But you can’t just count every single drone -how could you ever know that you had caught them all?You instead take the following approach: you build a taser-net that you can use to stun and catch drones (muchmore fun than just watching), before tagging them and re-releasing them into the wild. Working for a week, youmanage to tag 400 drones, releasing them back into the wild. After waiting a week, you start catching drones again.Catching another 400 drones, you find that 270 of the drones you’ve caught are tagged, meaning you’d caught thembefore. 130 of your new catch
Watching all these drones buzz back and forth is giving you eyestrain. But you can’t just count every single drone -how could you ever know that you had caught them all?You instead take the following approach: you build a taser-net that you can use to stun and catch drones (muchmore fun than just watching), before tagging them and re-releasing them into the wild. Working for a week, youmanage to tag 400 drones, releasing them back into the wild. After waiting a week, you start catching drones again.Catching another 400 drones, you find that 270 of the drones you’ve caught are tagged, meaning you’d caught thembefore. 130 of your new catch are untagged, meaning this is the first time that you’ve caught them.Assume drones were equally likely to be caught at all times. Before catching the second batch of drones, there were400 tagged drones in the wild, the rest were untagged.
1) What number of dronesNmakes your second batch resultsas likely as possible?
2) Assuming again that the
3)Which method - Problem 1 or Problem 2 - do you think gives more accurate or reliable results?Why?Be Thorough.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
