Using Immanuel Kant’s first version of the “categorical imperative”, explain in detail why cheating in an examination would be considered a violation of a perfect duty. First, begin by explaining the meaning of a categorical imperative as opposed to a hypothetical imperative. Second, discuss why Kant regards the categorical imperative as a “good without qualification.” Third, state and explain Kant’s first formulation of the categorical imperative. Next, briey discuss the distinction between perfect duty and imperfect duty in Kant’s formulation. Finally, provide a detailed account of the Kantian moral test (using the rst formulation of the categorical imperative) to show why cheating in an examination would constitute a violation of a perfect duty.
Using Immanuel Kant’s first version of the “categorical imperative”, explain in detail why cheating in an
examination would be considered a violation of a perfect duty. First, begin by explaining the meaning of a
categorical imperative as opposed to a hypothetical imperative. Second, discuss why Kant regards the
categorical imperative as a “good without qualification.” Third, state and explain Kant’s first formulation of
the categorical imperative. Next, briey discuss the distinction between perfect duty and imperfect duty in
Kant’s formulation. Finally, provide a detailed account of the Kantian moral test (using the rst formulation
of the categorical imperative) to show why cheating in an examination would constitute a violation of a
perfect duty.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps