Use an element argument to prove the statement. (Assume that all sets are subsets of a universal set U.) Statement: For all sets A, B, and C, (AB) n (CB) = (A nC) - B. Proof: Suppose A, B, and C are any sets. [To show that (AB) n (CB) = (An C) - B, we must show that (A - B) n (CB) C (An C) - B and that (An C) - BC (AB) n (C-B).] Part 1: Proof that (A - B)n (CB) C (An C) - B Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list. By definition of intersection, x EA - B and x EC - B. By definition of set difference, x EA - B and x EC - B. Therefore x E (An C) - B by the definition of set difference. By definition of set difference, x EA and x B and x E C and x € B. By definition of intersection, x EA and x B and x E C and x € B. Thus x E An C by definition of intersection, and, in addition, x # B. To prove Part 1, select sentences from the list and put them in the correct order. 1. Suppose x E (AB) n (CB). 2. Thus x € An C by definition of intersection, and, in addition, x # B. 3. ---Select--- 4. ---Select--- 5. ---Select--- 6. Hence, (AB) n (CB) C (An C) - B by definition of subset. Part 2: Proof that (An C) - BC (AB) n (CB) Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list. So by definition of set difference, x EA - B and x E C - B. By definition of set difference, x EA and x E C. Thus, by definition of intersection, x E A and x E C, and, in addition, x € B. Hence both x EA and x B and also x E C, and x # B. By definition of intersection, x E (A - B) n (CB). By definition of intersection x E An C and x € B. By definition of set difference x E An C and x € B.
Use an element argument to prove the statement. (Assume that all sets are subsets of a universal set U.) Statement: For all sets A, B, and C, (AB) n (CB) = (A nC) - B. Proof: Suppose A, B, and C are any sets. [To show that (AB) n (CB) = (An C) - B, we must show that (A - B) n (CB) C (An C) - B and that (An C) - BC (AB) n (C-B).] Part 1: Proof that (A - B)n (CB) C (An C) - B Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list. By definition of intersection, x EA - B and x EC - B. By definition of set difference, x EA - B and x EC - B. Therefore x E (An C) - B by the definition of set difference. By definition of set difference, x EA and x B and x E C and x € B. By definition of intersection, x EA and x B and x E C and x € B. Thus x E An C by definition of intersection, and, in addition, x # B. To prove Part 1, select sentences from the list and put them in the correct order. 1. Suppose x E (AB) n (CB). 2. Thus x € An C by definition of intersection, and, in addition, x # B. 3. ---Select--- 4. ---Select--- 5. ---Select--- 6. Hence, (AB) n (CB) C (An C) - B by definition of subset. Part 2: Proof that (An C) - BC (AB) n (CB) Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list. So by definition of set difference, x EA - B and x E C - B. By definition of set difference, x EA and x E C. Thus, by definition of intersection, x E A and x E C, and, in addition, x € B. Hence both x EA and x B and also x E C, and x # B. By definition of intersection, x E (A - B) n (CB). By definition of intersection x E An C and x € B. By definition of set difference x E An C and x € B.
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
need help

Transcribed Image Text:Part 2: Proof that (An C) - BC (AB) n (C - B)
Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list.
So by definition of set difference, x E A - B and x E C – B.
By definition of set difference, x E A and xEC.
Thus, by definition of intersection, x E A and x € C, and, in addition, x & B.
Hence both x EA and x & B and also x E C, and x & B.
By definition of intersection, x E (A – B) n (C – B).
-
By definition of intersection x EA n C and x & B.
By definition of set difference x E A n C and x & B.
To prove Part 2, select sentences from the list and put them in the correct order.
1. Suppose x E (An C) - B.
2. -Select---
3. ---Select---
4. --Select---
5. --Select---
6. --Select---
7. Hence, (A n C) - BC (A - B) n (CB) by definition of subset.
Conclusion:
Since both subset relations have been proved, it follows by definition of set equality that (A - B) n (C − B) = (An C) - B.
![Use an element argument to prove the statement. (Assume that all sets are subsets of a universal set U.)
Statement: For all sets A, B, and C,
(A - B)n (CB) = (An C) – B.
Proof:
Suppose A, B, and C are any sets. [To show that (A − B) n (C – B) = (A n C) - B, we must show that (A - B) n (CB) C (An C) - B and that (A n C) - BC (A - B) n (C – B).]
Part 1: Proof that (A - B)n (C - B) ≤ (An C) - B
Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list.
By definition of intersection, x E A - B and X E C - B.
By definition of set difference, x E A - B and x E C - B.
Therefore x E (An C) - B by the definition of set difference.
By definition of set difference, x EA and x & B and x E C and x & B.
By definition of intersection, x E A and x & B and X E C and x & B.
Thus x E An C by definition of intersection, and, in addition, x & B.
To prove Part 1, select sentences from the list and put them in the correct order.
1. Suppose x € (A – B) n (C − B).
2. Thus x EAN C by definition of intersection, and, in addition, x € B.
3. --Select---
4.---Select---
5. -Select---
6. Hence, (A - B) n (C - B) ≤ (An C) - B by definition of subset.
Part 2: Proof that (A n C) - BC (A - B)n (C - B)
Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list.
So by definition of set difference, x E A - B and x E C - B.
By definition of set difference, x E A and x E C.
Thus, by definition of intersection, x EA and x E C, and, in addition, x & B.
Hence both x E A and x & B and also x E C, and x & B.
By definition of intersection, x E (A − B) n (C – B).
By definition of intersection x EA n C and x & B.
By definition of set difference x EA n C and x & B.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Ff3cf874b-7a7b-478f-a7b8-421442e72224%2F266eb355-efa0-487e-ae10-289a59173dbf%2Flolx8t_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Use an element argument to prove the statement. (Assume that all sets are subsets of a universal set U.)
Statement: For all sets A, B, and C,
(A - B)n (CB) = (An C) – B.
Proof:
Suppose A, B, and C are any sets. [To show that (A − B) n (C – B) = (A n C) - B, we must show that (A - B) n (CB) C (An C) - B and that (A n C) - BC (A - B) n (C – B).]
Part 1: Proof that (A - B)n (C - B) ≤ (An C) - B
Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list.
By definition of intersection, x E A - B and X E C - B.
By definition of set difference, x E A - B and x E C - B.
Therefore x E (An C) - B by the definition of set difference.
By definition of set difference, x EA and x & B and x E C and x & B.
By definition of intersection, x E A and x & B and X E C and x & B.
Thus x E An C by definition of intersection, and, in addition, x & B.
To prove Part 1, select sentences from the list and put them in the correct order.
1. Suppose x € (A – B) n (C − B).
2. Thus x EAN C by definition of intersection, and, in addition, x € B.
3. --Select---
4.---Select---
5. -Select---
6. Hence, (A - B) n (C - B) ≤ (An C) - B by definition of subset.
Part 2: Proof that (A n C) - BC (A - B)n (C - B)
Consider the sentences in the following scrambled list.
So by definition of set difference, x E A - B and x E C - B.
By definition of set difference, x E A and x E C.
Thus, by definition of intersection, x EA and x E C, and, in addition, x & B.
Hence both x E A and x & B and also x E C, and x & B.
By definition of intersection, x E (A − B) n (C – B).
By definition of intersection x EA n C and x & B.
By definition of set difference x EA n C and x & B.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Recommended textbooks for you

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,

