Two sites are being considered for wind power generation. In the first site, the wind blows steadily at 7 m/s for 3000 hours per year, whereas in the second site the wind blows at 10 m/s for 2000 hours per year. Assuming the wind velocity is negligible at other times for simplicity, determine which is a better site for wind power generation. Hint: Note that the mass flow rate of air is proportional to wind velocity. kWh (per m² flow area), Emax,2 yr kWh (per m² flow area) yr Emax1 = 643 = 1250
Two sites are being considered for wind power generation. In the first site, the wind blows steadily at 7 m/s for 3000 hours per year, whereas in the second site the wind blows at 10 m/s for 2000 hours per year. Assuming the wind velocity is negligible at other times for simplicity, determine which is a better site for wind power generation. Hint: Note that the mass flow rate of air is proportional to wind velocity. kWh (per m² flow area), Emax,2 yr kWh (per m² flow area) yr Emax1 = 643 = 1250
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:Two sites are being considered for wind power generation. In the first site, the wind blows steadily
at 7 m/s for 3000 hours per year, whereas in the second site the wind blows at 10 m/s for 2000
hours per year. Assuming the wind velocity is negligible at other times for simplicity, determine
which is a better site for wind power generation. Hint: Note that the mass flow rate of air is
proportional to wind velocity.
kWh
(per m² flow area), Emax,2
yr
kWh
(per m² flow area)
yr
Emax1 = 643
= 1250
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
