Two products, LB and NH, emerge from a joint process. Product LB has been allocated P30,800 of the total joint costs of P44,000. A total of 2,000 units of product LB are produced from the joint process. Product LB can be sold at the split-off point for P13 per unit, or it can be processed further for an additional total cost of P14,000 and then sold for P15 per unit. If product LB is processed further and sold, what would be the effect on the overall profit of the company compared with sale in its unprocessed form directly after the split-off point?

Two products, LB and NH, emerge from a joint process. Product LB has been allocated P30,800 of the total joint costs of P44,000. A total of 2,000 units of product LB are produced from the joint process. Product LB can be sold at the split-off point for P13 per unit, or it can be processed further for an additional total cost of P14,000 and then sold for P15 per unit. If product LB is processed further and sold, what would be the effect on the overall profit of the company compared with sale in its unprocessed form directly after the split-off point?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Vikram
Stoney Brook Company produces two products (X and Y) from a joint process. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Additional processing requires no special facilities, and production costs of further processing are entirely variable and traceable to the products involved. Joint manufacturing costs for the year were $81,000. Sales values and costs were as follows: Product Units Made Sales Price at Split-Off If Processed Further Sales Value Separable Cost X 12,000 $ 43,000 $ 81,000 $ 10,500 Y 4,000 86,000 96,000 7,500 If the joint production costs are allocated based on the relative-sales-value method, what woukd be the amount of joint cost assigned to product X ?
Split Company produces three products — X, Y, and Z — from a joint process. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Additional processing requires no special facilities, and production costs of further processing are entirely variable and traceable to the products involved. Last year all three products were processed beyond split-off. Joint production costs for the year were $142,000. Sales values and costs needed to evaluate Split's production policy follow. Product Units Produced Sales Value at Split Off If Processed Further Sales Value Additional Costs x 16,000 $ 45,500 $ 107,500 $ 6,700 y 4,000 31,500 56,500 14,000 z 5,000 38,000 52,000 18,000 The amount of joint costs allocated to product X using the physical measure method is (calculate all ratios and percentages to 4 decimal places, for example 33.3333%, and round all dollar amounts to the nearest whole dollar):
Solve both questions with explanation and proper formatting
Pacheco, Inc., produces two products, overs and unders, in a single process. The joint costs ofthis process were $50,000, and 14,000 units of overs and 36,000 units of unders were produced.Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: overs, $18,000; unders,$23,040. Overs sell for $2.00 per unit; unders sell for $3.14 per unit.Required:1. Allocate the $50,000 joint costs using the estimated net realizable value method.2. Suppose that overs could be sold at the split-off point for $1.80 per unit. Should Pacheco sellovers at split-off or process them further? Show supporting computations.
Tango Company produces joint products M, N, and T from a joint process. This information concerns a batch produced in April at a joint cost of $190,000: Product Units Produced and Sold After Split-Off Total Separable Costs Total Final Sales Value M 17,000 $ 18,800 $ 230,000 N 11,000 16,400 210,000 T 12,000 3,800 39,000 Required: How much of the joint cost should be allocated to each joint product using the net realizable value method?
The Marshall Company has a joint production process that produces two joint products and a by-product. The joint products are Ying and Yang, and the by-product is Bit. Marshall accounts for the costs of its products using the net realizable value method. The two joint products are processed beyond the split-off point, incurring separable processing costs. There is a $1,500 disposal cost for the by- product. A summary of a recent month's activity at Marshall is shown below: Ying 75,000 75,000 $ 210,000 $ 15,000 $ 6.00 Total joint costs for Marshall in the recent month are $211,000, of which $90,730 is a variable cost. Units sold Units produced Separable processing costs-variable Separable processing costs-fixed Sales price Manufacturing cost per unit Total gross margin Yang 60,000 60,000 $ 65,000 $ 10,000 $ 12.50 Required: 1. Calculate the manufacturing cost per unit for each of the three products. (Round manufacturing cost per unit answers to 2 decimal places.) 2. Calculate the total…
Differential Chemical produced 10,500 gallons of Preon and 14,000 gallons of Paron. Joint costs incurred in producing the two products totaled $8,000. At the split-off point, Preon has a market value of $8.00 per gallon and Paron $4.00 per gallon. Compute the portion of the joint costs to be allocated to Preon if the value basis is used.
Split Company produces three products-X, Y, and Z-from a joint process. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Additional processing requires no special facilities, and production costs of further processing are entirely variable and traceable to the products involved. Last year all three products were processed beyond split-off. Joint production costs for the year were $130,000. Sales values and costs needed to evaluate Split's production policy follow. Product X y Z A. $27,132. B. $32,143. C. $37,143. D. $43,788. E. $60,714. OA B C Units Produced 14,000 7,500 3,500 OD Sales Value at Split Off $42,500 22,500 26,000 If Processed Further Sales Value $ 92,500 47,500 40,000 The amount of joint costs allocated to product Y using the sales value at split-off method is (calculate all ratios and percentages to 4 decimal places, for example 33.3333%, and round all dollar amounts to the nearest whole dollar): Additional Costs $ 3,700 8,000 9,000
Integrity Company manufactures two products, Alpha and Beta from a joint process. One production run costs P20,000 and results in 3,000 units of Alpha and 4,000 units of Beta. Neither product is salable at split-off but must be processed further such that the separable cost for Alpha is P10 per unit and for Beta is P5 per unit. The eventual market price for Alpha is P20 and for Beta, P10. If the company uses the constant gross margin approach in allocating joint cost to joint products, determine the total cost of product Alpha. Choices: • P12,000 • P18,000 • P38,000 • P42,000
Assume a company has two products—A and B—that emerge from a joint process. Product A has been allocated $24,000 of the total joint costs of $48,000. A total of 2,000 units of Product A are produced from the joint process. Product A can be sold at the split-off point for $16 per unit, or it can be processed further for an additional total cost of $14,800 and then sold for $25 per unit. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) of further processing Product A? Multiple Choice $(3,200) $3,200 $(22,000) $22,000
Corporation manufactures three products from a joint process. The three products are in industrial grade form at the split- off point. They can either be sold at that point or processed further into premium grade. Costs related to each batch of this process is as follows: Sales Price at split-off point Allocated joint costs Sales Price after further processing Cost of further processing Product Quantity Product 1 $16 $6,000 $20 $5,330 1,000 lb. Product 2 $12 $6,000 $18 $2,050 1,000 lb. Product 3 $5 $6,000 $14 $2,530 1,000 lb. Q: What would be the additional amount of profit that more profitable to process further rather than be sold at the split-off point? A: $ Corp, would gain from further processing the product(s) that is/are