Two engineers are having an argument about the efficiency of a tube-side multipass heat exchanger compared to a similar exchanger with a single tube-side pass. Smith claims that for a given number of tubes and rate of heat transfer, more area is required in a two-pass exchanger than in a one pass, because the effective temperature difference is less. Jones, on the other hand, claims that because the tube-side velocity and hence the heat transfer coefficient are higher, less area is required in a two-pass exchanger. With the conditions given below, which engineer is correct? Which case would you recommend, or what changes in the exchanger would you recommend? Exchanger specifications: 200 tube passes total 1-inch OD copper tubes, 16 BWG Tube-side fluid: water entering at 16°C, leaving at 28°C, at a rate of 225,000 kg/h Shell-side fluid: Mobiltherm 600, entering at 50°C, leaving at 33°C shell-side coefficient = 1700 W/m2 K A. U = 1091 W/m2K, U = 1288 W/m2K, 148 m?, 138 m2 B. U = 1091 W/m2K, U = 1288 W/m?K, 148 m?, 138 m? C. U = 1091 W/m²K, U = 1288 W/m2K, 148 m?, 138 m? D. U = 1091 W/m?K, U = 1288 W/m2K, 148 m2, 138 m2

Elements Of Electromagnetics
7th Edition
ISBN:9780190698614
Author:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
ChapterMA: Math Assessment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1MA
icon
Related questions
Question
Two engineers are having an argument about the efficiency of a tube-side multipass heat exchanger
compared to a similar exchanger with a single tube-side pass. Smith claims that for a given number of tubes and
rate of heat transfer, more area is required in a two-pass exchanger than in a one pass, because the effective
temperature difference is less. Jones, on the other hand, claims that because the tube-side velocity and hence
the heat transfer coefficient are higher, less area is required in a two-pass exchanger. With the conditions given
below, which engineer is correct? Which case would you recommend, or what changes in the exchanger
would you recommend?
Exchanger specifications:
200 tube passes total
1-inch OD copper tubes, 16 BWG
Tube-side fluid:
water entering at 16°C, leaving at 28°C, at a rate of 225,000 kg/h
Shell-side fluid:
Mobiltherm 600, entering at 50°C, leaving at 33°C shell-side coefficient = 1700 W/m2K
A. U = 1091 W/m2K, U = 1288 W/m2K, 148 m², 138 m?
B. U= 1091 W/m?K, U = 1288 W/m?K, 148 m?, 138 m?
C. U = 1091 W/m?K, U = 1288 W/m?K, 148 m?, 138 m2
D. U = 1091 W/m?K, U = 1288 W/m2K, 148 m?, 138 m?
Transcribed Image Text:Two engineers are having an argument about the efficiency of a tube-side multipass heat exchanger compared to a similar exchanger with a single tube-side pass. Smith claims that for a given number of tubes and rate of heat transfer, more area is required in a two-pass exchanger than in a one pass, because the effective temperature difference is less. Jones, on the other hand, claims that because the tube-side velocity and hence the heat transfer coefficient are higher, less area is required in a two-pass exchanger. With the conditions given below, which engineer is correct? Which case would you recommend, or what changes in the exchanger would you recommend? Exchanger specifications: 200 tube passes total 1-inch OD copper tubes, 16 BWG Tube-side fluid: water entering at 16°C, leaving at 28°C, at a rate of 225,000 kg/h Shell-side fluid: Mobiltherm 600, entering at 50°C, leaving at 33°C shell-side coefficient = 1700 W/m2K A. U = 1091 W/m2K, U = 1288 W/m2K, 148 m², 138 m? B. U= 1091 W/m?K, U = 1288 W/m?K, 148 m?, 138 m? C. U = 1091 W/m?K, U = 1288 W/m?K, 148 m?, 138 m2 D. U = 1091 W/m?K, U = 1288 W/m2K, 148 m?, 138 m?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 5 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Elements Of Electromagnetics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780190698614
Author:
Sadiku, Matthew N. O.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanics of Materials (10th Edition)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9780134319650
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259822674
Author:
Yunus A. Cengel Dr., Michael A. Boles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Control Systems Engineering
Control Systems Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118170519
Author:
Norman S. Nise
Publisher:
WILEY
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanics of Materials (MindTap Course List)
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781337093347
Author:
Barry J. Goodno, James M. Gere
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Engineering Mechanics: Statics
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118807330
Author:
James L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige, J. N. Bolton
Publisher:
WILEY