Two alternative investments are being considered. Design A has an initial cost of $3 million and annual cost of 135,000 dollars per year. Design B has an initial cost of $3.7 million and annual cost of 70,000 dollars per year. What is the rate of return of design B as compared to design A? Hint it is between 5% and 10% . MY Answer is 9.29 % is it correct?

Two alternative investments are being considered. Design A has an initial cost of $3 million and annual cost of 135,000 dollars per year. Design B has an initial cost of $3.7 million and annual cost of 70,000 dollars per year. What is the rate of return of design B as compared to design A? Hint it is between 5% and 10% . MY Answer is 9.29 % is it correct?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Nowadays it is very important to reduce one's carbon "footprint" (how much carbon we produce in our daily lifestyles). Minimizing the use of fossil fuels and instead resorting to renewable sources of energy (e.g., solar energy) are vital to a "sustainable" lifestyle and a lower carbon footprint. Let's consider solar panels that prewarm the water fed to a conventional home water heater. The solar panels have an installed cost of $2,198, and they reduce the homeowner's energy bill by $28.5 per month. The residual value of the solar panels is negligible at the end of their 8-year life. What is the annual effective IRR of this investment? The annual effective IRR of this investment is %. (Round to two decimal places.)
In general, the IRR comparison method and the PW comparison method Question options: A produce the same decisions for independent projects but not for mutually exclusive projects B produce the same decisions for mutually exclusive projects but not for independent projects C produce different decisions for both independent projects and mutually exclusive projects D produce the same decisions for both independent projects and mutually exclusive projects E produce the same decisions for projects with unequal lives
Suppose that you have just completed the mechanical design of a high-speed automated palletizer that has an investment cost of $3,800,000. The existing palletizer is quite old and has no salvage value. The market value for the new palletizer is estimated to be $430,000 after nine years. One million pallets will be handled by the palletizer each year during the nine-year expected project life. What net savings per pallet (i.e., total savings less expenses) will have to be generated by the palletizer to justify this purchase in view of a MARR of 18% per year? Use the AW method. Click the icon to view the interest and annuity table for discrete compounding when the MARR is 18% per year. The net savings required to be generated by the new palletizer to justify its purchase are $ per pallet (Round to the nearest cent)
If that 30% return on investment (ROI) occurs over a decade, r = .55 and n = 10, so the annualized rate of return is 0.0653 0.02658 0.0554 0.0201
Avian Air Cargo is considering an investment of $10,000,000 with life expectancy of 10 years and annual operating cost of $400,000 in Year 1 with an $50,000 per year starting in Year 2 through the life of the project. Avian Air Cargo anticipates a revenue stream of $2,500,000 per year for 20 years I 12%, what is the rate of return for this project and is it economically justified? It is NOT economically justified because the rate of return is between 14% and 15%. It IS economically justified because the rate of return is between 10% and 11%. It is NOT economically justified because the rate of return is between 10% and 11%. It IS economically justified because the rate of return is between 14% and 15% of MARR