Theorem 13.Let {xn} be a solution of Eq.(1). Then the following statements are true: (i) b < d and for Suppose N>0, the intial conditions some XN-1+1,...,XN-k+1,...,XN-1, XN E are valid, then for b + e and d + be, we have the inequality (A+B+C+D)+ < Xn <(A+B+C+D)+e) (b-e) (44) (d-be) for all N. Suppose N>0, the intial conditions (ii) b > d for and some XN-141,..,XN-k+1;.……,XN–1, XN are valid, then for b + e and d + be, we have the inequality (A+B+C+D)+ s Xps(A+B+C+D)+ (d-be)' (45) | for all n> N.

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question

show me the steps of determine blue and the inf is here

Theorem 13.Let {Xn} be a solution of Eq. (1). Then the
following
statements
are
true:
(1)
N>0, the intial conditions
Suppose
b <
and
for
some
XN-1+1, ..., XN-k+1,·.., XN-1, XN E
are valid, then for b + e and d + be, we have the
inequality
b
(b-e)
(44)
$(A+B+C+D)+
< Xn < (A+B+C+D)+
- be)
for
all
n
N.
(ii)
N>0, the intial conditions
Suppose
b >
d
and
for
some
XN-1+1,..,XN-k+1,..., XN-1, XN E| 1,
valid, then for b
e and d + be,
we have the
inequality
(A+B+C+D)+ < Xp(A+B+C+D) + T
b
(b-e)
(d-be)
(45)
for all n> N.
Proof.First of all, if for some N>0, 2< XN <1 and b#e,
we have
bxN-k
XN+1 = AXN+ BXN–k+ CxN–1+DxN-o +
dxN-k- exN-1
bxN-k
<A+B+C+D+
(46)
dxN-k- exN-1
But, it is easy to see that dxN-k– exN-12 b- e, then for
b+ e, we get
XN+1 <A+B+C+D+
(47)
b-e
е
Similarly, we can show that
XN+1 2
b
(A+B+C+ D) +
bxN-k
(48)
dxN-k- exN-1
But, one can see that dxN-k- exN–1<be, then for d +
be, we get
d.
XN+1 2
(A+B+C+D) +
(49)
d – be
From (47) and (49) we deduce for all n> N that the
inequality (44) is valid. Hence, the proof of part (i) is
completed.
Similarly, if 1 < XN <, then we can prove part (ii)
which is omitted here for convenience. Thus, the proof is
now completed.O
Transcribed Image Text:Theorem 13.Let {Xn} be a solution of Eq. (1). Then the following statements are true: (1) N>0, the intial conditions Suppose b < and for some XN-1+1, ..., XN-k+1,·.., XN-1, XN E are valid, then for b + e and d + be, we have the inequality b (b-e) (44) $(A+B+C+D)+ < Xn < (A+B+C+D)+ - be) for all n N. (ii) N>0, the intial conditions Suppose b > d and for some XN-1+1,..,XN-k+1,..., XN-1, XN E| 1, valid, then for b e and d + be, we have the inequality (A+B+C+D)+ < Xp(A+B+C+D) + T b (b-e) (d-be) (45) for all n> N. Proof.First of all, if for some N>0, 2< XN <1 and b#e, we have bxN-k XN+1 = AXN+ BXN–k+ CxN–1+DxN-o + dxN-k- exN-1 bxN-k <A+B+C+D+ (46) dxN-k- exN-1 But, it is easy to see that dxN-k– exN-12 b- e, then for b+ e, we get XN+1 <A+B+C+D+ (47) b-e е Similarly, we can show that XN+1 2 b (A+B+C+ D) + bxN-k (48) dxN-k- exN-1 But, one can see that dxN-k- exN–1<be, then for d + be, we get d. XN+1 2 (A+B+C+D) + (49) d – be From (47) and (49) we deduce for all n> N that the inequality (44) is valid. Hence, the proof of part (i) is completed. Similarly, if 1 < XN <, then we can prove part (ii) which is omitted here for convenience. Thus, the proof is now completed.O
The main focus of this article is to discuss some qualitative behavior of
the solutions of the nonlinear difference equation
a1Ym-1+a2Ym-2+ a3Ym-3+ a4Ym–4+ a5Ym-5
Ут+1 — Аутt
т 3 0, 1, 2, ...,
B1Ym-1+ B2Ym-2 + B3Ym-3 + B4Ym-4 + B3Ym-5
(1.1)
where the coefficients A, a;, B; E (0, 0), i = 1, ..., 5, while the initial condi-
tions y-5,y-4,Y–3,Y–2, Y–1, yo are arbitrary positive real numbers. Note that
the special case of Eq.(1.1) has been discussed in [4] when az = B3 = a4 =
= a5 = B5 = 0 and Eq.(1.1) has been studied in [8] in the special case
B4
when a4 =
B4 = a5 = B5 = 0 and Eq.(1.1) has been discussed in [5] in the
special case when az = B5 = 0.
Transcribed Image Text:The main focus of this article is to discuss some qualitative behavior of the solutions of the nonlinear difference equation a1Ym-1+a2Ym-2+ a3Ym-3+ a4Ym–4+ a5Ym-5 Ут+1 — Аутt т 3 0, 1, 2, ..., B1Ym-1+ B2Ym-2 + B3Ym-3 + B4Ym-4 + B3Ym-5 (1.1) where the coefficients A, a;, B; E (0, 0), i = 1, ..., 5, while the initial condi- tions y-5,y-4,Y–3,Y–2, Y–1, yo are arbitrary positive real numbers. Note that the special case of Eq.(1.1) has been discussed in [4] when az = B3 = a4 = = a5 = B5 = 0 and Eq.(1.1) has been studied in [8] in the special case B4 when a4 = B4 = a5 = B5 = 0 and Eq.(1.1) has been discussed in [5] in the special case when az = B5 = 0.
Expert Solution
Step 1

To get the inequality (48).

XN+1bdA+B+C+D+bXNkdXNkeXN1               .......................48

We have

xN+1=AXN+BXNk+CxNl+DXNσ+bXNkdXNkeXnl      ............*where the coefficients A,B,C,D,b,d,e0, and k,l, and σ are positive inegers

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Basics (types, similarity, etc)
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,