The U.S. unemployment rate for 20- to 24-year-olds went from 8.5% in 2007 to 16% in 2009, stayed above 13% through 2012, but fell to 7% by the first half of 2018. As a result, more adult children moved back to live with their parents or asked for financial help than in previous years. The share of 25- to 34-year-olds living in multigenerational households rose from 11% in 1980 to 15% in 2016. A recent survey finds that 41% of parents provide financial support to their 23- to 28-year-old offspring. Indeed, parents give 10% of their income on average to their adult children. Mimi wants to support her son Jeff if he looks for work but not otherwise. Jeff (unlike most young people) wants to try to find a job only if his mother will not support his life of indolence. Mimi and Jeff's payoff matrix is illustrated in the figure to the right. If Jeff and Mimi choose actions simultaneously, what are the pure- or mixed-strategy Nash equilibria? Determine the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium for this game. O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to not support and Jeff to loaf. Support Mimi No Support Look for Work 6 3 Jeff 2 Loaf -4 8

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
10th Edition
ISBN:9781285635101
Author:MCEACHERN
Publisher:MCEACHERN
Chapter18: Income Distribution And Poverty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 3QFR
icon
Related questions
Question

1

The Great Recession of 2007-2009 hit young people particularly hard, with long-lasting effects.
The U.S. unemployment rate for 20- to 24-year-olds went from 8.5% in 2007 to 16% in 2009,
stayed above 13% through 2012, but fell to 7% by the first half of 2018. As a result, more adult
children moved back to live with their parents or asked for financial help than in previous years.
The share of 25- to 34-year-olds living in multigenerational households rose from 11% in 1980 to
15% in 2016. A recent survey finds that 41% of parents provide financial support to their 23- to
28-year-old offspring. Indeed, parents give 10% of their income on average to their adult children.
Mimi wants to support her son Jeff if he looks for work but not otherwise. Jeff (unlike most young
people) wants to try to find a job only if his mother will not support his life of indolence. Mimi and
Jeff's payoff matrix is illustrated in the figure to the right.
If Jeff and Mimi choose actions simultaneously, what are the pure- or mixed-strategy Nash
equilibria?
Determine the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium for this game.
A. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to not support and Jeff to loaf.
B. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to support and Jeff to loaf.
C. This game has no Nash equilibria.
D. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to not support and Jeff to look for work.
E. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to support and Jeff to look for work.
Determine the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for this game.
= and for Jeff to
The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to support with probability M
look for work with probability 0,=. (Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.)
←
Support
Mimi
No Support
Look for Work
6
-4
3
Jeff
2
Loaf
- 4
0
8
0
Transcribed Image Text:The Great Recession of 2007-2009 hit young people particularly hard, with long-lasting effects. The U.S. unemployment rate for 20- to 24-year-olds went from 8.5% in 2007 to 16% in 2009, stayed above 13% through 2012, but fell to 7% by the first half of 2018. As a result, more adult children moved back to live with their parents or asked for financial help than in previous years. The share of 25- to 34-year-olds living in multigenerational households rose from 11% in 1980 to 15% in 2016. A recent survey finds that 41% of parents provide financial support to their 23- to 28-year-old offspring. Indeed, parents give 10% of their income on average to their adult children. Mimi wants to support her son Jeff if he looks for work but not otherwise. Jeff (unlike most young people) wants to try to find a job only if his mother will not support his life of indolence. Mimi and Jeff's payoff matrix is illustrated in the figure to the right. If Jeff and Mimi choose actions simultaneously, what are the pure- or mixed-strategy Nash equilibria? Determine the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium for this game. A. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to not support and Jeff to loaf. B. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to support and Jeff to loaf. C. This game has no Nash equilibria. D. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to not support and Jeff to look for work. E. The Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to support and Jeff to look for work. Determine the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for this game. = and for Jeff to The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium is for Mimi to support with probability M look for work with probability 0,=. (Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.) ← Support Mimi No Support Look for Work 6 -4 3 Jeff 2 Loaf - 4 0 8 0
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Nash Equilibrium
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro
Economics
ISBN:
9781285635101
Author:
MCEACHERN
Publisher:
Cengage
Economics:
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:
9781285859460
Author:
BOYES, William
Publisher:
Cengage Learning