The table below shows data over several years for a country's real GDP, the number of full-time employed workers (E), and the annual average number of hours worked per worker (H). a. & b. For each of the four years, compute real GDP per worker-a standard measure of labour productivity-and a slightly more complex measure of labour productivity-real GDP per hour worked. (Round your answers to the nearest cent.) Year 1 5 10 15 Real GDP $524 billion $559 billion $661 billion $765 billion Full-time Employed Workers (E) 12.8 million 13.6 million 14.3 million 15.3 million Number of Hours Worked per Worker (H) 2023 1961 1932 1891 GDP E GDP EXH

The table below shows data over several years for a country's real GDP, the number of full-time employed workers (E), and the annual average number of hours worked per worker (H). a. & b. For each of the four years, compute real GDP per worker-a standard measure of labour productivity-and a slightly more complex measure of labour productivity-real GDP per hour worked. (Round your answers to the nearest cent.) Year 1 5 10 15 Real GDP $524 billion $559 billion $661 billion $765 billion Full-time Employed Workers (E) 12.8 million 13.6 million 14.3 million 15.3 million Number of Hours Worked per Worker (H) 2023 1961 1932 1891 GDP E GDP EXH

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter20: Economic Growth

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 34P: Say that the average worker in Canada has a productivity level of 30 per hour while the average...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Say that the average worker in the U.S. economy is eight times as productive as an average worker in Mexico. If the productivity of U.S. workers grows at 2 for 25 years and the productivity of Mexicos workers grows at 6 for 25 years, which country will have higher worker productivity at that point?
In 1980, Denmark had a GDP of 70 billion (measured in U.S. dollars} and a population of 5.1 million. In 2000, Denmark had 3 GDP of 160 billion (measured in U.S. dollars} and a population of 5.3 million. By what percentage did Denmarks GDP per capita rise between 1980 and 2000?
Are there other ways in which we can measure productivity besides the amount produced per hour of work?
An economy starts off with a GDP per capital of 12,000 euros. How large will the GDP per capita be if it grows at an annual rate of 3 for 10 years? 3 for 30 years? 6 for 30 years?
Say that the average worker in Canada has a productivity level of 30 per hour while the average worker in the United Kingdom has a productivity level of 25 per hour (both measured in U.S. dollars). Over the next five years, say that worker productivity in Canada grows at 1 per year while worker productivity in the UK grows 3 per year. After five years, whiz) will have the higher productivity level, and by how much?
Refer back to the Work It Out about Comparing the Economies of Two Countries and examine the data for the two countries you chose. How are they similar? How are they different?
A typical U.S. worker today works fewer than 40 hours per week, while in 1890, he or she worked 60 hours per week. Does this difference in the length of work weeks matter in comparing the economic well-being of U.S. workers today with that of 1890? Or can we use the difference between real GDP per capita today and in 1890 to measure differ- ences in economic well-being while ignoring differences in the number of hours worked per week? Briefly explain.
QUESTION 10 Consider the scenario given in the table below for two economies, Economy X andEconomy Z. Note that the two economies are identical in every aspect except for their level of productivity (A). A Ko No In ak S Economy X Economy Z 20 15 10 1 0.15 0.3 0.1 10 1 0.15 0.3 0.1 The GDP of economy X in period 10 (i.e., Y10) is equal to (Round your answers to 1 decimal point.)
What were the sources of labor productivity growth in the U.S. economy during the sixty years since 1960? How did the 1960s differ from the more recent decades? During the sixty years since 1960, the sources of labor productivity growth include O A. plastics, the laser, and the computer during the 1960s, and the Internet during later years O B. the focus on saving energy during the 1970s O C. the wide-spread introduction of the Internet during the 1970s O D. the global financial turmoil of 2008-2009 that made labor more productive Comparing the 1960s to the more recent decades, labor productivity growth than in subsequent decades. O A. in the 1960s was approximately 25 percent higher O B. in the 1960s was smaller C. due to technological change was smaller in the 1960s O D. due to physical capital and human capital growth was greater in the 1960s Click to select your answer. MacBook A
how do gains in worker productivity lead to gains in per capita GDP a- As workers produce more, their wages will rise an d they will have more disposable income for consumption, leading to a rise in GDP per capita. b- The amount a worker can produce
Suppose that U.S. real GDP per capita is $50,000 and grows on average at 3% per year. How long will it take for U.S. real GDP per capita to double at this growth rate? If this growth rate continues, what will U.S. real GDP r capita be in 70 years? S Suppose that U.S. real GDP per capita is $50,000 and grows on average at 5% per year (rather than 3% a year) How long will it take for U.S. real GDP per capita to double at this growth rate? years (round to nearest year) If this growth rate continues, what will U.S. real GDP per capita be in 70 years? S years (round to nearest year)
Macmillan Learning Suppose that the GDP of California increases by 12% each year. How long will it take for the GDP of California to double? Round your answer to one digit after the decimal. duration for California's GDP to double: Suppose that the GDP of Oregon today is exactly twice what it was 22 years ago. What was the average annual growth for Oregon over this time period? Round your answer to one digit after the decimal. average annual growth for Oregon: years % each year