The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions in a horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside rail, so that horse has the shortest distance to run. (Because the number of horses varies from year to year, only the first 10 post positions are included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse race? Post Position 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wins 1818 1515 1212 1616 1313 66 77 1313 55 1111 Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Upper H 0H0: ▼ Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions. Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions. At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others. At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others. Upper H 1H1: ▼ At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others. At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others. Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions. Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions. Calculate the test statistic, chi squaredχ2. chi squaredχ2equals=nothing (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Calculate the P-value. P-valueequals=nothing (Round to four decimal places as needed.) What is the conclusion for this hypothesis test? A. RejectReject Upper H 0H0. There is sufficientsufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. B. Fail to rejectFail to reject Upper H 0H0. There is insufficientinsufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. C. Fail to rejectFail to reject Upper H 0H0. There is sufficientsufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.. D. RejectReject Upper H 0H0. There is insufficientinsufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse race?

The table below lists the frequency of wins for different post positions in a horse race. A post position of 1 is closest to the inside rail, so that horse has the shortest distance to run. (Because the number of horses varies from year to year, only the first 10 post positions are included.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse race? Post Position 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wins 1818 1515 1212 1616 1313 66 77 1313 55 1111 Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Upper H 0H0: ▼ Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions. Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions. At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others. At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others. Upper H 1H1: ▼ At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others. At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others. Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions. Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions. Calculate the test statistic, chi squaredχ2. chi squaredχ2equals=nothing (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Calculate the P-value. P-valueequals=nothing (Round to four decimal places as needed.) What is the conclusion for this hypothesis test? A. RejectReject Upper H 0H0. There is sufficientsufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. B. Fail to rejectFail to reject Upper H 0H0. There is insufficientinsufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. C. Fail to rejectFail to reject Upper H 0H0. There is sufficientsufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.. D. RejectReject Upper H 0H0. There is insufficientinsufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions. Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse race?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

q26

Post Position	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
Wins	1818	1515	1212	1616	1313	66	77	1313	55	1111

Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.

Upper H 0H0:

▼

Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions.

Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions.

At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others.

At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others.

Upper H 1H1:

▼

At least one post position has a different frequency of wins than the others.

At least one post positions have a different frequency of wins than the others.

Wins occur with all different frequency in the different post positions.

Wins occur with equal frequency in the different post positions.

Calculate the test statistic,

chi squaredχ2.

chi squaredχ2equals=nothing

(Round to three decimal places as needed.)

Calculate the P-value.

P-valueequals=nothing

(Round to four decimal places as needed.)

What is the conclusion for this hypothesis test?

RejectReject

Upper H 0H0.

There is

sufficientsufficient

evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.

Fail to rejectFail to reject

Upper H 0H0.

There is

insufficientinsufficient

evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.

Fail to rejectFail to reject

Upper H 0H0.

There is

sufficientsufficient

evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions..

RejectReject

Upper H 0H0.

There is

insufficientinsufficient

evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the likelihood of winning is the same for the different post positions.

Based on the result, should bettors consider the post position of a horse race?

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Chi-squared Tests$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.