The slant shear test is widely accepted for evaluating the bond of resinous repair materials to concrete; it utilizes cylinder specimens made of two identical halves bonded at 30°. An article reported that for 12 specimens prepared using wire-brushing, the sample mean shear strength (N/mm2) and sample standard deviation were 18.60 and 1.56, respectively, whereas for 12 hand-chiseled specimens, the corresponding values were 23.19 and 4.07. Does the true average strength appear to be different for the two methods of surface preparation?   State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05. (Use ?1 for wire-brushing and ?2 for hand-chiseling.) H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0 Ha: ?1 − ?2 ≤ 0H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0 Ha: ?1 − ?2 < 0    H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0 Ha: ?1 − ?2 > 0H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0 Ha: ?1 − ?2 ≠ 0 Calculate the test statistic and determine the P-value. (Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.) t  =    P-value  =    You may have computed the probability of one tail of the distribution. Consider which area of the distribution is appropriate. State the conclusion in the problem context. Reject H0. The data suggests that the true average strength is not different for the two methods of surface preparation.Fail to reject H0. The data suggests that the true average strength is not different for the two methods of surface preparation.    Fail to reject H0. The data suggests that the true average strength is not different for the two methods of surface preparation.Reject H0. The data suggests that the true average strength is different for the two methods of surface preparation. What are you assuming about the shear strength distributions? It is assumed that variances of distributions for both preparation types are equal.It is assumed that means of distributions for both preparation types are equal.    It is assumed that distributions for both preparation types are the same.It is assumed that distributions for both preparation types are normal.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

The slant shear test is widely accepted for evaluating the bond of resinous repair materials to concrete; it utilizes cylinder specimens made of two identical halves bonded at 30°. An article reported that for 12 specimens prepared using wire-brushing, the sample mean shear strength (N/mm2) and sample standard deviation were 18.60 and 1.56, respectively, whereas for 12 hand-chiseled specimens, the corresponding values were 23.19 and 4.07. Does the true average strength appear to be different for the two methods of surface preparation?

 

State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05. (Use ?1 for wire-brushing and ?2 for hand-chiseling.)

H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0
Ha: ?1 − ?2 ≤ 0H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0
Ha: ?1 − ?2 < 0    H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0
Ha: ?1 − ?2 > 0H0: ?1 − ?2 = 0
Ha: ?1 − ?2 ≠ 0


Calculate the test statistic and determine the P-value. (Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.)

t  =   
P-value  =   
You may have computed the probability of one tail of the distribution. Consider which area of the distribution is appropriate.



State the conclusion in the problem context.

Reject H0. The data suggests that the true average strength is not different for the two methods of surface preparation.Fail to reject H0. The data suggests that the true average strength is not different for the two methods of surface preparation.    Fail to reject H0. The data suggests that the true average strength is not different for the two methods of surface preparation.Reject H0. The data suggests that the true average strength is different for the two methods of surface preparation.


What are you assuming about the shear strength distributions?

It is assumed that variances of distributions for both preparation types are equal.It is assumed that means of distributions for both preparation types are equal.    It is assumed that distributions for both preparation types are the same.It is assumed that distributions for both preparation types are normal.
Expert Solution
Step 1: Given Information:

The sample size of the specimens prepared using wire-brushing, n subscript 1 equals 12

The sample size of the hand-chiseled specimens, n subscript 2 equals 12

The sample mean shear strength of wire-brushing, top enclose x subscript 1 end enclose equals 18.60 space

The sample mean shear strength of hand -chiseled, top enclose x subscript 2 end enclose equals 23.19

The sample standard deviation of the wire-brushing, s subscript 1 equals 1.56

The sample standard deviation of the hand-chiseled, s subscript 2 equals 4.07

The significance level, alpha equals 0.05


trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 18 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman