The results of a sieve analysis are reported in table 1. The total weight of the sample was 500 g. Plot the gradation curve, calculate CU and Cz, and use these coefficients the determine whether the soil is well graded or poorly graded. Table 1. Results of the sieve analysis Sieve size Weight retained (g) # 4 #10 14.8 # 20 98 # 40 90.1 #100 181.9 #200 108.8 Pan 6.1

The results of a sieve analysis are reported in table 1. The total weight of the sample was 500 g. Plot the gradation curve, calculate CU and Cz, and use these coefficients the determine whether the soil is well graded or poorly graded. Table 1. Results of the sieve analysis Sieve size Weight retained (g) # 4 #10 14.8 # 20 98 # 40 90.1 #100 181.9 #200 108.8 Pan 6.1

Structural Analysis

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337630931

Author:KASSIMALI, Aslam.

Publisher:KASSIMALI, Aslam.

Chapter2: Loads On Structures

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The results of the sieve analysis done on a soil are shown below. Sieve No. Diameter Soil A 4 4.760 96 6 2.380 91 10 2.000 89 20 0.840 85 40 0.420 81 60 0.250 78 100 0.149 67 200 0.074 64 LL 40 PL 30 Determine its classification using USCS. ML MH None of the above CL CH
I need the correct answer and as soon as possible please
ANSWER THE SECOND PROBLEM ONLY NOTE: BOX THE FINAL ANSWER
Situation 3. Following are the results of a sieve analysis. Determine: a. Cu b. Cc c. So Sieve No. 4 6 10 20 40 60 100 200 Pan Diameter (mm) 4.760 2.380 2.000 0.840 0.420 0.250 0.149 0.074 Soil Sample Mass Retained (g) 100 180 86 160 105 134 110 65 45
Make comments about the general properties of the soil by classifying the floors given in the figures in the laboratory test results according to AASHTO and UCSC.
the results of the sieve analysis done on a soil are shown below. Determine its classification using USCS. a. None of the above b. ML c. MH d. CL e. CH
Q.2) Answer the following question. 1- The sieve analysis below was done for which type Weight of sample = 2000gm Sieve size in. (mm) 3/8" 9.5 mm No.4 4.75 mm No.8 2.36 mm No.16 1.18 mm No.30 0.6 mm No.50 0.3 mm No.100 0.15 mm Pan Percent Weight retained (g) retained 0 2000*100 94 →0 Klcc→ -2000 4032000X100 358-2009 08 72 2212000x100 Percent cumulative @ 4.7 20 i 75 982 57 360 72000 Alco isies 39 492-20000 24.614 · 100 > 95 3 of aggregate. Percent passing 0 5 25 уз 61 86 97 317 ASTM Limit 100 95_100 80_100 40 85 25_60 10_30 2_10
a. determine the effective size diameter d. determine the coefficient of uniformity c. determing the coefficient curvature The results of sieve analysis are shown below. Sieve No. Opening Size (mm) Mass Retained (g) 4 4.750 10 2.000 18.5 20 0.850 53.2 40 0.425 90.5 60 0.250 81.8 100 0.150 92.2 200 0.075 58.5 Pan 26.5
SG is 2.66 and temperature is 18 degrees celcius
Problem 4: The following are the results of a sieve analysis. a. Determine the percent finer than each sieve and plot a grain-size distribution curve. b. Determine D10, D30, D60, for the soil. c. Calculate the uniformity coefficient Cu. d. Calculate the coefficient of gradation Cc. U.S. Sieve N 4 10 20 40 60 100 200 Pan U.S. Sieve N Mass of Soil Retained (g) Problem 5: Repeat problem 4 with the following data. 4 6 10 20 40 60 100 200 Pan 0 18.5 53.2 90.5 81.8 92.2 58.5 26.5 Mass of Soil Retained (g) 0 0 0 9.1 249.4 179.8 22.7 15.5 23.5
The following table shows the sieve analysis data on the left and hydrometer test data on the right for the minus No. 200 sieve material for a given soil. (a) Compute Cu and Cc. (b) Report the percentage gravel, sand, silt, and clay according to AASHTO. (c) Classify the soil according to AASHTO.
A sample soil is obtained and sieve analysis is performed to determined its particle distribution. Sieve Opening Mass Retained % Finer # 6 3.35 146 # 8 2.36 88 #16 1.18 125 # 40 0.425 56 #50 0.3 42 #140 0.106 127 # 200 0.075 126 Pan 29 Determine: 1. Effective Size (in mm and in 4 decimal places) 2. Uniformity Coefficient (in 2 decimal places) 3. Coefficient of Curvature (in 2 decimal places) 4. Sorting Coefficient (in 2 decimal places)