The recidivism rate for sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 332 convicted sex offender them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a= 0 a. For this study, we should use z-test for a population proportion b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: (please enter a decima 011

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
Please help solve letters G-I , thank you
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 11%. A warden suspects that this percent is higher if the
sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 332 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 50 of
them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?
a. For this study, we should use [z-test for a population proportion
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: pv =
0.11
(please enter a decimal)
H₁: pv #
(Please enter a decimal)
v 0.11
c. The test statistic z =
d. The p-value = 0.181
e. The p-value is
α
f. Based on this, we should Select an answer the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
2.364
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%.
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%.
O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%.
h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
O There is a 0.9% chance that more than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become
repeat offenders.
O There is a 0.9% chance of a Type I error.
O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders
is 15% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would
be a 0.9% chance of concluding that more than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts
become repeat offenders.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is 11% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then
there would be a 0.9% chance that more than 15% of the 332 convicted sex offender drug
addicts in the study will become repeat offenders.
Transcribed Image Text:The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 11%. A warden suspects that this percent is higher if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 332 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 50 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use [z-test for a population proportion b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: pv = 0.11 (please enter a decimal) H₁: pv # (Please enter a decimal) v 0.11 c. The test statistic z = d. The p-value = 0.181 e. The p-value is α f. Based on this, we should Select an answer the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... 2.364 (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%. O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O There is a 0.9% chance that more than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. O There is a 0.9% chance of a Type I error. O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 15% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 0.9% chance of concluding that more than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 0.9% chance that more than 15% of the 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study will become repeat offenders.
or
ทร
c. The test statistic z = 2.364 (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
d. The p-value = 0.181
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
e. The p-value is
a
f. Based on this, we should Select an answer the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%.
O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%.
O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so
there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%.
h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
O There is a 0.9% chance that more than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become
repeat offenders.
O There is a 0.9% chance of a Type I error.
OIf the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders
is 15% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would
be a 0.9% chance of concluding that more than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts
become repeat offenders.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is 11% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then
there would be a 0.9% chance that more than 15% of the 332 convicted sex offender drug
addicts in the study will become repeat offenders.
i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is higher than 11% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are
observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the
proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to
11%.
O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat
offenders is 11% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then
there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all
convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%.
O There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who
become repeat offenders is higher than 11%.
O There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
Transcribed Image Text:or ทร c. The test statistic z = 2.364 (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = 0.181 (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is a f. Based on this, we should Select an answer the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%. O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 11% at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O There is a 0.9% chance that more than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. O There is a 0.9% chance of a Type I error. OIf the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 15% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 0.9% chance of concluding that more than 11% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts become repeat offenders. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed then there would be a 0.9% chance that more than 15% of the 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study will become repeat offenders. i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 11%. O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 11% and if another 332 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%. O There is a 1% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 11%. O There is a 1% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman