Please solve the rest , thank you h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O There is a 10.96% chance of a Type I error.O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offendersis 12% and if another 381 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there wouldbe a 10.96% chance that we would conclude either fewer than 15% of all convicted sexoffender drug addicts become repeat offenders or more than 15% of all convicted sex offenderdrug addicts become repeat offenders.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 15% and if another 381 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed thenthere would be a 10.96% chance that either fewer than 12% of the 381 convicted sex offenderdrug addicts in the study become repeat offenders or more than 18% of the 381 convicted sexoffender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders.O There is a 10.96% chance that the percent of all convicted sex offender drug addicts becomerepeat offenders differs from 15%.i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O There is a 5% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts whobecome repeat offenders is different from 15%.O There is a 5% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.OIf the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is different from 15% and if another 381 convicted sex offender drug addicts areobserved then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that theproportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to15%.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 15% and if another 381 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, thenthere would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of allconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%. Question 8< >The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 15%. A warden suspects that this percent is different ifthe sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 381 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 46 ofthem became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance?a. For this study, we should use z-test for a population proportion ✓b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: pv =V 0.15(please enter a decimal)H₁: pv #(Please enter a decimal)0.15c. The test statistic zv= 1.807d. The p-value =e. The p-value is saf. Based on this, we shouldg. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)Select an answer the null hypothesis.O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05, sothere is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%.O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05,so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%.O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05,so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 15%.

Given that Population proportion=0.15 Sample size (n)=381 Number of them repeat offender (X)=46…

The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 15%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 381 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 46 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use z-test for a population proportion b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: pv = v 0.15 (please enter a decimal) H₁: pv # (Please enter a decimal) 0.15 c. The test statistic z = 1.807 d. The p-value= e. The p-value is sa f. Based on this, we should g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) Select an answer the null hypothesis. O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 15%.

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P