The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 15%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 306 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 43 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance? a. For this study, b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Но: ? we should use Select an answer (please enter a decimal) (Please enter a decimal) ? H1: ? ? c. The test statistic? (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = e. The p-value is ? f. Based on (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) the null hypothesis. this, we should Select an answer g. Thus, the final conclusion is that .. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 15%. The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 15% at a 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 15% and if another 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 64.24% chance that either fewer than 14% of the 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders or more than 16% of the 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if another 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 64.24% chance that we

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 15%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex
offender is also a drug addict. Of the 306 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 43 of them became repeat
offenders. What can be concluded at the a =
0.05 level of significance?
a. For this study,
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Но: ?
we should use Select an answer
(please enter a decimal)
(Please enter a decimal)
?
H1: ?
?
c. The test statistic?
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
d. The p-value =
e. The p-value is ?
f. Based on
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
the null hypothesis.
this,
we should Select an answer
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ..
The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a 0.05, so there is
statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug
addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 15%.
The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 15% at a 0.05, so there is
statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug
addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%.
The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05, so there is
statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug
addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%.
h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 15%
and if another 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 64.24% chance
that either fewer than 14% of the 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat
offenders or more than 16% of the 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat
offenders
If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if
another 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 64.24% chance that we
Transcribed Image Text:The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 15%. A warden suspects that this percent is different if the sex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 306 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 43 of them became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance? a. For this study, b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Но: ? we should use Select an answer (please enter a decimal) (Please enter a decimal) ? H1: ? ? c. The test statistic? (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = e. The p-value is ? f. Based on (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) the null hypothesis. this, we should Select an answer g. Thus, the final conclusion is that .. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 15%. The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 15% at a 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%. The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 15% at a = 0.05, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is different from 15%. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 15% and if another 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there would be a 64.24% chance that either fewer than 14% of the 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders or more than 16% of the 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts in the study become repeat offenders If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is 14% and if another 306 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, then there would be a 64.24% chance that we
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman